Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Inceldom is not just lack of sex?

Barnacle

Barnacle

Banned
-
Joined
Sep 8, 2019
Posts
1,415
If Inceldom is much more than a lack of sex than could we argue that all powerful, rich and generally high status men who are not attractive are actually incels, despite all the women they get, because it is all through their money etc.?

Examples are ugly rock stars such as Mick Jagger or Steven Tyler, they only got women through their wealth and status.

What I am getting to is that Escortcels are still regarded as Incels, technically escorting is the same as how rich men get to women.
 
All women have their price. Normies just pay a monthly retainer. Betabuxxing is escortcelling.
 
Ok, try to be more specific. We observed AT LEAST, 3 different kind of validations: Social, Attraction-based/sexual, Emotional.
 
Yeah, but they didn't had to pay directly to these women. These women they fucked were not hookers, they were normal whores interested in their status.
 
Social, Attraction-based/sexual, Emotional.
This.
Attraction-based validation is the best thing that can happen to a man. It's what makes life worth living.
Social/wealth based validation is fake and to me it's worthless. I can spend thousands of euros on various high tier whores if I wanted to, but it means nothing to me.
 
Yeah, but they didn't had to pay directly to these women. These women they fucked were not hookers, they were normal whores interested in their status.
Okay but what exacly is the difference?
Nobody would bang a Steve Buscemi if he was not rich, money is just a form of status.
This.
Attraction-based validation is the best thing that can happen to a man. It's what makes life worth living.
Social/wealth based validation is fake and to me it's worthless. I can spend thousands of euros on various high tier whores if I wanted to, but it means nothing to me.
You are correct but that is the life that all these super stars live, it may be empty as you say but they get all the sex BECAUSE of their power. Giving a whore 500$ for a night of sex is the same.
 
Okay but what exacly is the difference?
Nobody would bang a Steve Buscemi if he was not rich, money is just a form of status.
The difference is that those women were after them in the first place. They were probably treated better by those civilian whores. Usually, in the case of escortcels, they go after the women to pay them and fuck them.
 
Rich Fakecels on here will call Satanic Jews who are pumping and dumping hundreds of underage JB's and executing them in sacrifice chambers Incel, because they're "ugly fat manlets lol rich doesn't count".

Pathetic. Money is highly connected to your ability to find a partner, females are attracted to resource stability quite a bit, just because you don't know how to differentiate between presenting yourself as economically stable/attractive and flaunting your wealth to attract gold digging non virgins doesn't mean money is not a legitimate way of escaping Inceldom.
 
This.
Attraction-based validation is the best thing that can happen to a man. It's what makes life worth living.
Social/wealth based validation is fake and to me it's worthless. I can spend thousands of euros on various high tier whores if I wanted to, but it means nothing to me.
By "social validation", we are talking about a desire of adaptation. It's still sexual-oriented, defined by societal standards behind the concept of "sexual success" or "norms in relationships", or "normie sexual experiences". But it's still a thing linked to validation, this time is defined by society criterion.

Sexual validation infer a broader range of subjectivity, and emotional validation is the more precise.
 
Rich Fakecels on here will call Satanic Jews who are pumping and dumping hundreds of underage JB's and executing them in sacrifice chambers Incel, because they're "ugly fat manlets lol rich doesn't count".

Pathetic. Money is highly connected to your ability to find a partner, females are attracted to resource stability quite a bit, just because you don't know how to differentiate between presenting yourself as economically stable/attractive and flaunting your wealth to attract gold digging non virgins doesn't mean money is not a legitimate way of escaping Inceldom.
Attraction in the blackpill context refers to physical/sexual raw attraction.
Of course women are "attracted" to money, but they're never attracted to the idea of a man having money or power unless that man is also sexually attractive in which case it's a huge bonus.
Having money and power as a sub6 man doesn't make you more attractive, it just makes your money and power attractive.

Some people have this idea that women are sexually attracted to money and power. Women are sexually attracted exclusively to chiseled jaws, large stature/height, hunter eyes etc.
 
Last edited:
Rich Fakecels on here will call Satanic Jews who are pumping and dumping hundreds of underage JB's and executing them in sacrifice chambers Incel, because they're "ugly fat manlets lol rich doesn't count".

Pathetic. Money is highly connected to your ability to find a partner, females are attracted to resource stability quite a bit, just because you don't know how to differentiate between presenting yourself as economically stable/attractive and flaunting your wealth to attract gold digging non virgins doesn't mean money is not a legitimate way of escaping Inceldom.
"Money is highly connected to your ability to find a partner" which would also include escorting,atleast for sex or a night out(escorting is not just whoring around)"

Gold diggers=Prostitutes, so all rich men who are really ugly like a Buscemi,Steven Tyler or most rich Jews are actually Incels as they Escortcels.
Hell a Dan Blizerian could count as he pays all his women.
 
Having money and power doesn't make you more attractive, it just makes your money and power attractive.
No, they make you more attractive, physically. It's the woman meme brain what we are studying, they waste a lot of clock cycles to define your social status, and they can be attracted (physically) to wealth, as shown by the blackpill. But, the most important thing is the face, it doesn't mean that everything else is meaningless, it just means that there's a hierarchy and the attraction phenomenon can be explained, and it's mostly derived from your phenotype, your looks.
 
No, they make you more attractive, physically. It's the woman meme brain what we are studying, they waste a lot of clock cycles to define your social status, and they can be attracted (physically) to wealth, as shown by the blackpill. But, the most important thing is the face, it doesn't mean that everything else is meaningless, it just means that there's a hierarchy and the attraction phenomenon can be explained, and it's mostly derived from your phenotype, your looks.
I don't buy that. Women aren't these magic mysterious creatures people make them out to be. They see Chad, they get wet. It's as simple as that. If you want to get laid and get validation without money or power being involved you have to be physically/sexually attractive. This is the kind of validation that matters the most. In my opinion it's the only type of validation worth having. It's real and raw. Obviously women seek things in life other than enjoyable sex. Everyone likes money.

You're talking about relationships which are mostly based on factors other than sexual attractiveness. It's a form of socially accepted and promoted prostitution.
Women use sub7 men for the things they often can't get from attractive men (emotional validation, money, status, long term stability.)
Ugly wealthy jews have many women, but those women also have many men. It's prostitution, it's really that simple.
 
Last edited:
"Incel" has always been a slight misnomer. While involuntary celibacy is definitely part of the experience, it is only part of a broader rejection by society as a whole. Older descriptors like "loser" and "washout" are actually more accurate.
 
Women aren't these magic mysterious creatures people make them out to be
Of course they are not. We can frame them pretty easily. It just takes 1 or 2 weeks to read the blackpill studies in the wiki and you know everything about women. Then there are other studies out there, you can take 1 month and become an expert on "female nature", surpassing every so called "intellectual" who talked about the mysterious nature of women. You have a greater knowledge at your disposal, and it's easy to acquire.

There's no mystery. When men deal with something they cannot explain they come up with myths and bullshit, it's the case with women's nature. We can destroy the myth, it's pretty easy indeed.
 
"Incel" has always been a slight misnomer. While involuntary celibacy is definitely part of the experience, it is only part of a broader rejection by society as a whole. Older descriptors like "loser" and "washout" are actually more accurate.
Good observation.
 
Attraction in the blackpill context refers to physical/sexual raw attraction.
And women being attracted to resources, and stability comes from innate biology. This is how they evolutionarily developed. They are BIOLOGICALLY attracted to this. Perhaps not as much as physical attraction, but its still a factor, and a big one, especially the less partners they have. The same thing goes for status. There's a reason it's called LMS and not L, because money and status are extremely important, it's why for example whites, even poor whites, can go to to SEA, because of the status that comes from white worship in Asia, or why in a leftist area like L.A a thugmaxxed poor black is more likely to get with a 6/10 white female than he would be in an actual conservative christian predominantly white small town in middle america.

Men are the only ones who have 1 primarily motivation sexual drive, and that is just L, of course we all have secondary drives aswell, but women have 3.
 
Last edited:
"Incel" has always been a slight misnomer. While involuntary celibacy is definitely part of the experience, it is only part of a broader rejection by society as a whole. Older descriptors like "loser" and "washout" are actually more accurate.
You are right but many are real Truecels, men who really can't get any action with women, either too ugly,deformed or too autistic.
 
"Money is highly connected to your ability to find a partner" which would also include escorting,atleast for sex or a night out(escorting is not just whoring around)"

Gold diggers=Prostitutes, so all rich men who are really ugly like a Buscemi,Steven Tyler or most rich Jews are actually Incels as they Escortcels.
Hell a Dan Blizerian could count as he pays all his women.
See the most recent post I made before this one.
 
"Incel" has always been a slight misnomer. While involuntary celibacy is definitely part of the experience, it is only part of a broader rejection by society as a whole. Older descriptors like "loser" and "washout" are actually more accurate.
Yeas.

And you can see it in fact.

Look at right wings who protest - their hidden motive is bad look. I mean those who shoot. And theit phiiscal disadvantage even more visible in the context of elitarian shit like fack boys clubbers and other.

Look at all the rest of groups.

This is because of hatred to whole west as to degenerate oversexualised Sodom.

I want to remind you that this is not beta aprising amymore . it is alpha aprising like aprising of Spartakus.

You have to deal dear cocksuccers with alphas now.
My browser is fucked. So sorry for the typos in my text
 
Last edited:
See the most recent post I made before this one.
So a guy who can pay for an escort, alot for a high end one, would also fit in this description.
Money=Status=Women=Sex
 
There's a reason it's called LMS and not L, because money and status are extremely important
Yes, another important thing we have to point out is that LMS is about PHYSICAL attractiveness, you have to stress on this point otherwise it will not be clear enough. Physical attractiveness

And YES, money and status are proven (by the blackpill and redpill) to be legit variables to include in our hierarchy, where of course the face is at the top.

Never forget that with money you can buy your lookmaxing strategy.
 
So a guy who can pay for an escort, alot for a high end one, would also fit in this description.
Money=Status=Women=Sex
To a degree, I mean I would say this. If you can actively afford to have active sex with prostitutes, as in 3-7 times a week, every week, every month, every year, you're definitely not an Incel, especially if you're able to fulfill every sexual fantasy you have, can probably afford and want to if not haven't already gone into darker territory with said money but wont talk about it for fear of being exposed.

However someone who out of shame and desperation and ignorance scrounges up enough money over the course of several months to be able to afford a session with an escort, even if they're not a virgin, I would consider them an Incel, even if they might have made a low IQ move.

But yeah you can use money to to looksmaxx, locationmaxx, statusmaxx, various other ways to improve your sexual value. People who deny this are typically either sexual hedonists fakecels, or people extremely ignorant and low IQ and only got their money because of circumstance and luck, which is typical of most people with money nowadays.
 
To a degree, I mean I would say this. If you can actively afford to have active sex with prostitutes, as in 3-7 times a week, every week, every month, every year, you're definitely not an Incel, especially if you're able to fulfill every sexual fantasy you have, can probably afford and want to if not haven't already gone into darker territory with said money but wont talk about it for fear of being exposed.

However someone who out of shame and desperation and ignorance scrounges up enough money over the course of several months to be able to afford a session with an escort, even if they're not a virgin, I would consider them an Incel, even if they might have made a low IQ move.

But yeah you can use money to to looksmaxx, locationmaxx, statusmaxx, various other ways to improve your sexual value. People who deny this are typically either sexual hedonists fakecels, or people extremely ignorant and low IQ and only got their money because of circumstance and luck, which is typical of most people with money nowadays.
Okay, I agree.
I would add that going to an escort is not just pay and get laid, you can get rejected if you are extremely ugly, strongly deformed, unhygienic or if there are better men around(okay this will not happen with a schedule made with a call).
Another thing is that many Incels have mental issues such as depression, autism or low self-esteem which would hinder them to go to an Escort the same way they could not talk to a woman in general.
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top