Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based In right uncucked socialism everyone must pay progressive taxes based on their beauty

  • Thread starter Napoleon de Jizzbal
  • Start date
Napoleon de Jizzbal

Napoleon de Jizzbal

mentally crippled by lonely teen years
-
Joined
Apr 9, 2019
Posts
17,855
Ugly men are most dsicriminated, and not deserving that , so that should be partially solved by progressive taxes, based on beauty. First everyone be rated by beauty comissions, and their gotten rate will determine what a taxes they will pay. So in that way taxes for above average men will be higher, for below will be lower, and for ugliest men no taxes at all. If man surgerymaxxes and becomes beatifull, he still pays taxes depend on his natural beauty. But in opposite way, it would depend on new looks, so if wealthier chad wanting lower taxes will negatively surgerymaxx intio uglier, he will be recognised and pay taxes as uglier man

And as for femoids - all of them will pay taxes, but lowest will be for average. For stacies taxes will be bigger, for ugly femorloids - even much more bigger, because they trash and must pay for wasted air and space
 
also add a tax for fat people.
 
also add a tax for fat people.
For fat-special tax,s ome for men, very big for femoids. For being criminally unhealthy+for aesthetically polluting environment
 
Based
Incelistan should come true tbh
 
That's never going to happen. If anything they'll likely want to tax ugly men who aren't procreating, and redistribute the taxes to single moms with Chad/Tyrone's bastard kids.
 
That's never going to happen. If anything they'll likely want to tax ugly men who aren't procreating, and redistribute the taxes to single moms with Chad/Tyrone's bastard kids.
Sounds like what's already going on
 
Ugly men are most dsicriminated, and not deserving that , so that should be partially solved by progressive taxes, based on beauty. First everyone be rated by beauty comissions, and their gotten rate will determine what a taxes they will pay. So in that way taxes for above average men will be higher, for below will be lower, and for ugliest men no taxes at all. If man surgerymaxxes and becomes beatifull, he still pays taxes depend on his natural beauty. But in opposite way, it would depend on new looks, so if wealthier chad wanting lower taxes will negatively surgerymaxx intio uglier, he will be recognised and pay taxes as uglier man

And as for femoids - all of them will pay taxes, but lowest will be for average. For stacies taxes will be bigger, for ugly femorloids - even much more bigger, because they trash and must pay for wasted air and space
socialism is trash, more government control incels always get consripted to work bad jobs.
 
What if an ugly, morbidly obese 2/10 loses weight and becomes a 4/10? Does he have to pay a higher tax rate? If so, aren't you deterring him from losing weight? But we want people to be healthy because people who aren't obese are less of a burden on the healthcare system though...

I'm slightly conflicted, because the point of making attractive individuals pay additional tax is to make life easier for people who are already dealt a shit hand in life (i.e. ugly men). However, such a tax might have the unwanted side effect of discouraging individuals, males and foids, who want to "looksmaxx" and "gymmaxx". I propose that these commissions focus more on immutable characteristics such as face, height, and race, as opposed to fashion sense, hygiene, and physical fitness.
 
Never paying taxes crew.
 
What if an ugly, morbidly obese 2/10 loses weight and becomes a 4/10? Does he have to pay a higher tax rate? If so, aren't you deterring him from losing weight? But we want people to be healthy because people who aren't obese are less of a burden on the healthcare system though...

I'm slightly conflicted, because the point of making attractive individuals pay additional tax is to make life easier for people who are already dealt a shit hand in life (i.e. ugly men). However, such a tax might have the unwanted side effect of discouraging individuals, males and foids, who want to "looksmaxx" and "gymmaxx". I propose that these commissions focus more on immutable characteristics such as face, height, and race, as opposed to fashion sense, hygiene, and physical fitness.
Fat pays taxes of fat, if becomes 4/10 without facial surgery, pays taxes of 4/10
 
That's such a gay idea. Taxes are gay, invented by women for women. Men pay all the taxes, women need all of them. Without the welfare system whores would be out on the street starving. End welfare and socialism now, make this world just again.
 
That's such a gay idea. Taxes are gay, invented by women for women. Men pay all the taxes, women need all of them. Without the welfare system whores would be out on the street starving. End welfare and socialism now, make this world just again.
In uncucked socialism - no welfare for cunts
 
In uncucked socialism - no welfare for cunts
I mean I understand but it's an utopia, and it'd be great if it'd work, but it doesn't work like that. Ending welfare once and for all is a thing that can actually work, you could implement it. People would laugh at the idea of a beauty tax, but many hard-working men and even some "women" (lesbian lawyers) would welcome an end to welfare. That way single moms would either have to work hard or stay married. Then we just need to come up with a solution for all the thottery (make pornography and anything like it illegal) and boom ... problem solved.
 
Last edited:
Sounds like what's already going on
Then I must be far behind on the bell curb, but seeing I'm a NEET it shouldn't be a surprise really.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top