Think about it. Feminism is too devious and unnatural and should have disappeared on its own. There must have been a reason why it didn't fade away and was actually promoted. There must have been a perceived use case for it by the global western elite with some end goal behind it.
I honestly think, and I have no proof but my gut instinct tells me that at first, feminism was initially conjured up by fat ugly white women but then the western global elite decided that it could be very useful in the long term to control human population.
I think the elite of any society sees the masses of people that they govern as huge burdens. Huge burdens that must be satisfied or else they will revolt and society/civilization will collapse.
Any society can function reasonably well if it is rich enough as well as its population small enough (and as long as its safe and secure).
Thats the conclusion that the western elite must have came to a long time ago even before WWI (or maybe right around that time).
Point is that I just had an epiphany thats all. Of course feminism sucks and we find ourselves here shitposting and jacking off to porn all day but at the same time, one can't make the argument against population control. Too much people creates a violatile risky situation for humanity.
I just wish there was a better means to population control rather than feminism.
Just letting nature do its thing and letting the strongest survive doesn't quite work either because the strongest surviving nation will just go on to have a higher population in order to control the smaller nations.
Any thoughts?
Of course I don't have any sources or literature to quote on here but I just had an epiphany thats all. That human overpopulation is the greatest threat to humanity (at least as perceived by the global western elite).
Also one more thing, its also why the western world is so adamant of another major lie, ie that climate change is real and poses a great threat to humanity. In reality imo, its human consumption of oil/energy that the elite is so concerned about and the fact that the human population is only growing with time.
Just as investors in the stock market know that they can make money over time so as long as they're patient, its the same thing with social engineering imo. Feminism was a long term investment that had low risk to immediate societal collapse and yet has potential long term effectiveness in controlling human population. As we can see now though, we are at the high point of it all and it very much seems that America is facing immediate collapse mainly because of feminism. I can tell so much American men are lost nowadays and its only getting worst.
Its also why America imports a bunch of third worlders and illegals to prevent or cushion the threat of collapse due to feminism and so many upset American men.
I honestly think, and I have no proof but my gut instinct tells me that at first, feminism was initially conjured up by fat ugly white women but then the western global elite decided that it could be very useful in the long term to control human population.
I think the elite of any society sees the masses of people that they govern as huge burdens. Huge burdens that must be satisfied or else they will revolt and society/civilization will collapse.
Any society can function reasonably well if it is rich enough as well as its population small enough (and as long as its safe and secure).
Thats the conclusion that the western elite must have came to a long time ago even before WWI (or maybe right around that time).
Point is that I just had an epiphany thats all. Of course feminism sucks and we find ourselves here shitposting and jacking off to porn all day but at the same time, one can't make the argument against population control. Too much people creates a violatile risky situation for humanity.
I just wish there was a better means to population control rather than feminism.
Just letting nature do its thing and letting the strongest survive doesn't quite work either because the strongest surviving nation will just go on to have a higher population in order to control the smaller nations.
Any thoughts?
Of course I don't have any sources or literature to quote on here but I just had an epiphany thats all. That human overpopulation is the greatest threat to humanity (at least as perceived by the global western elite).
Also one more thing, its also why the western world is so adamant of another major lie, ie that climate change is real and poses a great threat to humanity. In reality imo, its human consumption of oil/energy that the elite is so concerned about and the fact that the human population is only growing with time.
Just as investors in the stock market know that they can make money over time so as long as they're patient, its the same thing with social engineering imo. Feminism was a long term investment that had low risk to immediate societal collapse and yet has potential long term effectiveness in controlling human population. As we can see now though, we are at the high point of it all and it very much seems that America is facing immediate collapse mainly because of feminism. I can tell so much American men are lost nowadays and its only getting worst.
Its also why America imports a bunch of third worlders and illegals to prevent or cushion the threat of collapse due to feminism and so many upset American men.
Last edited:
