Deleted member 126
cockroach
-
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2017
- Posts
- 2,560
They deserved it for attacking incels.
I use to like them.Sets a very bad precedent regarding First Amendment rights, but I can't say I feel any personal sense of loss. Jones was pretty entertaining, but that PJW buttfucker was a real cretin.
His wife divorced him but he still worships women.Imagine Alex Jones being blackpilled
"Cope"His wife divorced him but he still worships women.
kekWon't be long now....
We would just regroup somewhere else.I'm not. Imagine what will happen to us
This. Only brainlets support censorship simply because they don't like someone.I'm not. Imagine what will happen to us
What are they going to do execute us?This. Only brainlets support censorship simply because they don't like someone.
Who?What are they going to do execute us?
Only low Iq cucks watched that shit
Youtube is a private company, it doesn't set any 'new precedents', by banning someone. If we want youtube to be a public square with 1st amendment privileges then it needs to be nationalizedSets a very bad precedent regarding First Amendment rights
Youtube is a private company, it doesn't set any 'new precedents', by banning someone. If we want youtube to be a public square with 1st amendment privileges then it needs to be nationalized
I was sure someone would raise a pedantic objection to my wording. I don't mean necessarily a legal precedent, but a premonition of future actions to be taken by corporate monoliths. Even in the legal sense, there are cases to be made against private providers of utilities denying users/consumers access based on "unwelcome" speech:
https://www.amren.com/news/2018/06/...ound-in-anti-censorship-suit-against-twitter/
I would not be opposed to nationalizing YouTube, though.
Paul Watson has a rather soft, feminine face with the kool aid red lips to boot & tries to compensate for it by showing off how aggressive he can be which in his case ends up backfiring often & coming across as whiny. Off topic a little but that's my opinion of him.Sets a very bad precedent regarding First Amendment rights, but I can't say I feel any personal sense of loss. Jones was pretty entertaining, but that PJW buttfucker was a real cretin.
leftyincel said:Also, Jones has been shut up before by courts in valid defamation cases where he was using falsities to cause direct and observable harm to people, as in conspiring people to harass innocent individuals to the point that the harassed individuals are constantly fleeing for safety from Jones' army of stalkers
Satire or truth are legal avenues of oral warfare, but Jones isn't always trying to be a satire artist and he's rarely truthful
I'd just say like half of all his shows are liable to valid defamation cases.
get off my board you fucking globalists
Sort of. Infowars was an alt-lite cock tease that pussed out anytime they got too close to the truth.Was Infowars Pro-White?