It is cucked too, they mentioned it at the end of the video so I changed the title to include all cpu's after 2008.
over for intelcels
Hmmmmm interesting
What laptops dont have these cpus in them?
What laptops dont have these cpus in them?
You can get an old Lenovo ThinkPad and easily flash the bios.
My laptop might be 2007 but I'm not sure. He ain't getting into that tech.
Based. Now you're free to download tor and do what you want.
S
Oh no...
Ok, i hope it isnt slow though.
Incel atomcelI love me some good old bolshevism. When will we storm the intel factories?
With an Intel processor you get years of coreboot development put into disabling and neutralizing the Intel Management engine. Energy efficient Intel UHD Graphics powerful enough for 4K video, light graphics processing and 3D gaming.
intels.co
Like what @mNFwTJ3wz9 said. If you flash it with coreboot it will make it faster, and ThinkPads can have their ram, hard drives, and CPUs upgraded easily. I also saw someone connect an external GPU to it.
It's over for humanity
I'm pretty sure there is a way to disable the management system.
From what I learned, the only way is to flash the bios with something open source like Coreboot.
I thought coreboot barely worked on x86 though? I was thinking that you could flash a modified image to where the management system is stored, with everything but the bare minimum disabled.
Intels me
I only seen coreboot work on laptops, I'm not sure if it can work on a desktop. Your method probably works too, as long as it's flashed with something open source and trusted it should be ok.
another bullshit from tech corporations collaborating with the government.
i've always suspected this was the case.
of course many cucks are very happy with this spying and surveillance because they lack good father figures and want a replacement dad in the form of government and corporations.
found this on wikipedia, also:
many cucks and foids love this because they are unable to function in life without satan watching their every move and they think this will catch "bad people," which of course they're "good people."
i've always suspected this was the case.
of course many cucks are very happy with this spying and surveillance because they lack good father figures and want a replacement dad in the form of government and corporations.
found this on wikipedia, also:
so taxpayer money is spent to make our computers watch our every move on behalf of the NSA and make them less secure and open to vulnerabilities.
many cucks and foids love this because they are unable to function in life without satan watching their every move and they think this will catch "bad people," which of course they're "good people."
Last edited:
Y
The surveillance state is all too happy to redirect attention from abuses and overreaches of power to culture wars issues, including making up lies and fearmongering about incels
UKcels: remember when The Guardian used to be a lot less elitist and focused on surveillance issues instead of culture wars?
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2019-09-11-how-the-uk-security-services-neutralised-the-countrys-leading-liberal-newspaper/ The UK security services targeted The Guardian after the newspaper started publishing the contents of secret US government documents leaked by National Security...
incels.is
exactly why so many cucks support the overwatching of all aspects of life since they are so sure they are on the side of angels, which is corporations and the leftist government. what a joke since this kind of 1984 surveillance state was originally something they hated... how minds can change when you put the hatred of ugly men into the mix.The surveillance state is all too happy to redirect attention from abuses and overreaches of power to culture wars issues, including making up lies and fearmongering about incels
UKcels: remember when The Guardian used to be a lot less elitist and focused on surveillance issues instead of culture wars?
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2019-09-11-how-the-uk-security-services-neutralised-the-countrys-leading-liberal-newspaper/ The UK security services targeted The Guardian after the newspaper started publishing the contents of secret US government documents leaked by National Security...
Y
Would appreciate if you could reply to that thread tbh
The article I linked in that thread explains a lot of why a lot of culture wars bullshit is coming from The Guardian lately when it used to be a good source about the Snowden leaks and information about infringement on civil liberties.
i'm not the right person to be replying to that thread, tbh/
it's long and complex.
i have a generalized anger about how cucks love the invasion of privacy nowadays and very little working knowledge about how any of it works.
like i said, i just assumed i was being watched anyway.
but still may comment on that thread later on if i think of something other that "uk is cucked" or "fuck government surveillance"
Those low t and low iq cucks drag all non chad men down with them. They might not be the majority even if it seems that way, because all the uncucked men get censored on main stream sites.
Ragefuel. Hopefully soon there will be more ways to improve cucked and unsafe cyber security. And uncucked men have to unite and stop paying taxes, they can't put millions of us in jail.
damn, i can't believe people are not at all angry about this but very supportive.
i really hope social mores turn around in the near future and they are the ones being thrown in jail for fucking this world over and wishing vengeful death on anyone who doesn't worship cuckery and women.
if i was king, i would outlaw all of this; in fact it should obviously have been outlawed already but the NSA is the ones doing it and so many people are enthusiastic to comply because of catching the "evil" people. if only the world knew who the real evil is.
Y
Me too man. And yeah the UK is one of the worst countries for all these sorts of things. But really not suprising that once moral panics about ugly men and sexual issues like pornography come up that people disregard all concerns about civil liberties and let themselves be tread on to stick it to ugly men.
"The trouble with fighting for human freedom is that one spends most of one's time defending scoundrels. For it is against scoundrels that oppressive laws are first aimed, and oppression must be stopped at the beginning if it is to be stopped at all."
H. L. Mencken
US editor (1880 - 1956)
Yup same with male sacrifice. These cucks are not content with just themselves sacrificing everything for women. They get some sick pleasure out of forcing other guys to do the same and against their will.
They never even catch real terrorists, they mainly use it to spy on us and censor us, or look to see if we're breaking any dumb laws like downloading torrents, or "harassing" rosties we know in real life online. But according to cucks that's terrorism enough to give up their freedom.
I don't care if those fags were the only ones who did it to themselves and not drag us down with them. The only reason I see them trying to drag us down is because they're too pussified to fight back, so they enjoy when "massah" whips the non compliant men in shape. I don't care if cucks want to pay taxes but they shouldn't force me to pay.
Yeah - I can't remember if the bug was called Spectre or Meltdown but I remember when it was first revealed that Intel had this management engine. It didn't surprise me really. I'm on AMD at the moment but I know they have similar vulnerabilities.
I wonder what the future holds for this. Over the last 10 years we have seen hardware really catch up to the demands of the software - my daily driver up until August was a 10 year old laptop and it could cope with most of what I did with it. There are some who say that Moores law is pretty much dead. Within a few years the bog standard AMD APU's should be able to cope with 1080p/60 frames gaming fairly easily. I'm not sure if we need these cutting edge hardware manufacturers anymore - especially the way Ryzen architecture is constructed.
AMD is going to be in a commanding position for the next 5 years at least. It's TSMC who make their silicon though.
Activist investors want Intel to abandon fabricating its own transistors. They really are fucked. Their 10nm is a disaster.
Apple already has its own ARM based silicon. Microsoft is talking about it.
RISC-V is the one to watch out for. At the level of performance we have now do we really need a processor market controlled by team red and team blue? With the move to a multi-polar world and a trend away from globalism I think we may get a lot more options in the market for silicon by 2030. I'm sure there will be consoomers chasing what team red and blue are making to cope with running MSFS 2030 or GTA 7 in 16K at 144Hz but really does the average person need that? Most people can hardly tell the difference between 1080p and 4K.
The fact is most of the western world is going to be significantly poorer for having gone through Coronachan and the great reset.
We could be a lot like latin America. Running a lot of cheap hardware and pirated and free software to make do. You might see a bunch of OEM's get into manufacturing their own processors many of them not in the US.
I wonder what the future holds for this. Over the last 10 years we have seen hardware really catch up to the demands of the software - my daily driver up until August was a 10 year old laptop and it could cope with most of what I did with it. There are some who say that Moores law is pretty much dead. Within a few years the bog standard AMD APU's should be able to cope with 1080p/60 frames gaming fairly easily. I'm not sure if we need these cutting edge hardware manufacturers anymore - especially the way Ryzen architecture is constructed.
AMD is going to be in a commanding position for the next 5 years at least. It's TSMC who make their silicon though.
Activist investors want Intel to abandon fabricating its own transistors. They really are fucked. Their 10nm is a disaster.
Apple already has its own ARM based silicon. Microsoft is talking about it.
RISC-V is the one to watch out for. At the level of performance we have now do we really need a processor market controlled by team red and team blue? With the move to a multi-polar world and a trend away from globalism I think we may get a lot more options in the market for silicon by 2030. I'm sure there will be consoomers chasing what team red and blue are making to cope with running MSFS 2030 or GTA 7 in 16K at 144Hz but really does the average person need that? Most people can hardly tell the difference between 1080p and 4K.
The fact is most of the western world is going to be significantly poorer for having gone through Coronachan and the great reset.
We could be a lot like latin America. Running a lot of cheap hardware and pirated and free software to make do. You might see a bunch of OEM's get into manufacturing their own processors many of them not in the US.
I can't wait for 1984 continental trucel dictatorship ngl.
High iq. I can't wait for new uncucked processors to be made, that's when I'll throw my AMD and Intel chips in the trash, even if they're a little faster.
If you have Apple and Microsoft licensing ARM designs with their own modifications.
If you have RISC-V as an open source instruction set. If you have cancerous companies like Nvidia controlling ARM. If some OEM's use ARM processors to lock down their hardware - like Apple is doing with its M1 chips. I really could see open source processor hardware becoming a thing. It could save manufacturers a lot of money on licensing and therefore cost. I'm sure it will have its pitfalls but I think technology has reached the point where you don't really need these big tech companies anymore - I think dencentralisation is going to be a trend going forward. I know certain people who have worked for the Linux foundation and even Torvalds himself have complained bitterly about things that Intel has done. Torvalds HATES Nvidia. Most computer hardware in the world are Linux servers running the back bone of the internet.
Something like the Ryzen 3400G like I use in this machine I'm typing this on - at the moment it state of the art. In 5 years? It's pretty dated. In 10 years who is to say some relatively small OEM's wouldn't be able to have something open sourced and fabricated that was similar with a 5nm process and some optimised graphics. It might be about 5 years out of date but most of its capabilities will probably satisfy most people and probably it will be very cheap because the 5nm process at TSMC will be super optimised.
I use Linux for example - have for years for everything except AAA gaming. My gaming PC is dual boot. I do still have to use windows for the odd thing and there are sacrifices to using Linux. I accept that. There will be sacrifices to not being on team blue or red but I really think they are going to loose a lot of their duopoly going forward.
D
Don't care; still want a ryzen 5 5600x
As an Incel privacy doesn’t really matter.
so you would post on this forum under your real name?
Oh hell no, it would be over over for me. I do keep privacy browsers and use VPNS, and extensions and etc.. but in the end I know it’s not doing too much for me.
yeah vpns help for the sites to hide your IP, but intel chips have a mini-computer that your computer doesn't know about that operates independently (even when your computer is off) and sends data to the NSA, including when you use a VPN to visit a site, potentially.
I use amd, is that ok
no, watch the end of the video and look at my quote from wikipedia above.
nsa made the deal with both amd and intel as part of their Sigint Enabling Project
It’s over
I see things being more decentralized and open sourced too. Cryptocurrency will transfer the majority of money to regular people, and it won't be controlled by the government and their regulations, so computer companies will start to work for our interest instead of them.
that sounds wonderful.
hopefully it comes to pass.
We will find out in the next few years. We'll either be killed off and enslaved or be free from the government.
i understand why people were saying blockchain could save the internet and the world.
decentralization is imperative; if that fails, the world fails.
We're lucky it was invented before the collapse, I don't know how we'll buy things when dollars become useless if we never had crypto.
i used to not understand the full implications of blockchain but now i do. it really is an immensely important invention, probably rivaling the internet itself.
It will change almost everything soon. I was one of the early users of the internet too, I used it during the napster and aol days, but I don't see crypto getting corrupted like the internet has because it's a lot harder to control decentralized coins, there's no ISP or VPN or hardware backdoors the government can subpoena to punish users who don't comply with their cucked rules like they can with the internet. Once people have control of their money again we can take back the internet and fund companies that make bug free hardware.
it will be freedom from censorship, banks, and corporations.
once written on the blockchain, it's on record, and no one can change that.
cucks will no longer be able to petition for media to get taken down because they don't like it.
visa and mastercard and paypal won't have the ability to take away the ability to transact financially from people that disagree with prevailing political thought.
and we won't have to archive things anymore.
it will make everything eternal and unchanging and greatly weaken government, hate mob, and corporate sanctions.
I
I hate videos didn't watch. But I'm curious. If it's the management engine does it still work if you don't install management engine and have a firewall?
I never install management engine and don't let anything i dont know past my firewall.
I never install management engine and don't let anything i dont know past my firewall.
Similar threads
starcrapoo
bcroger
Users who are viewing this thread
