B
Could that society have witnessed an actual revolution by men that demanded monogamy, equal access to women, making male & female infidelity(and genetic cuckoldry) a capital offence, etc.?
Discussion IF THE INCEL CRISIS HAD HAPPENED 100 OR MORE YEARS PRIOR IN THE PAST.....
Wym incels crisis, inkwells exist science forever no one wants genetic failures but atleast back then you could buy some foid slave and kill her if she displeases you.
Have to go back even farther as men were cucks even back then.
B
I don't think they existed en masse in the past though. Sure a tiny tiny % could've been incels, but the vast majority managed to get married by 30 I believe
B
I think men back then just had more testosterone, strong feelings of disgust, etc.. They were more virile than men today for sure.
The solution was found in Ancient Rome. Raid various other lands to capture slaves and sell them to men with no romantic options in the homeland.
B
You merely end up exporting your incel crisis to other lands and tribes. Monogamy is literally the only solution, atleast when it comes to containing the crisis & not allowing the contagion to spread any further than it has to
Simple Monogamy is a fake solution,Women used to cheat behind their partners backs all the time before the sexual revolution
B
doubt. Back then, parents of groom/bride/ both used to live with the married couple to take care of the would be kids in some if not many households. STDs had no cure and the ones who were promiscuous were also the ones who were highly likely to contract them. I get it that the Victorian era puritans is somewhat of a myth as brothels were highly populated by husbands with dry spells, but still, the issue of degeneracy was not as bad as today
No, monogamy is too simplistic. 107 males exist for every 93 females. The only way monogamy works is a pyramid scheme where older males always have first pick of younger females. This also requires society to accept adult men dating high school (teenage) girls.
B
fine
fuck no. the maximum age gap can only be 10 years and the woman should be no less than 20
No man that doesnt work. Especially in todays world.
Also there have always been genetically inferior beings, its called natural selection for a reason.
Also there have always been genetically inferior beings, its called natural selection for a reason.
B
I specifically mentioned 100 or years before the current time
B
sexual selection =/= natural selection
Sexual selection is literally natural selection.
The women searches a SEXUAL partner for superior genetics in order to have a superior offspring.
If its just a Sexual partner for Sexual relationship exclusively just get an escort - but that would be paid service.
B
just go extinct like irish elk bro
Yeah thats how it goes eventually, bkt unlike the Elk we dont have some body part on us that devours too much resources that it will eventually kill us.
B
well you can accept defeat & extinction or bloody well start doing something about it eh
Last edited:
No, I'm in my mid-30s. I can't be expected to want or accept slut foids within 10 years my age.
Maybe if you are only referring to a hypothetical scenario where everyone is able to get a girlfriend in an ideal society without being incel then that might be okay since no guy would ever be single past 21-22.
In this world, I mostly want a 14-17 year old, maybe 18 or 19. Not getting a college slut that's basically an amateur pornstar.
B
being a borderline pedo is still bad desu. 20-22 is the ideal minimum age.
No, there's nothing ideal about that. How is that the ideal age for girls in your opinion?
B
to ensure full neural development from puberty and real life experience, not sexual experience but rather experience garnered from interacting with positive & negative elements of life. 4-6 years after puberty, assuming women finish their puberty at 16-18 is not enough, but you do need some experience in life & also start having kids asap before egg quality dips.
If that were the case then women would select for IQ but they only select for height and face.
True in fact women go for low iq men more then high iq ones.
But IQ was never the most important thing in human Civilization, it was and is always status
Our height. We'll become too tall and our hearts won't be sble to handle it.
IQ is the most important for Civilization. If you have 1000 120 IQ truecels vs 1000 80 IQ 6'5 chads the truecels will win the war.
Neural development isn't important. Only physical development is important. Also, life experience is a negative thing for females. It makes them more selective, cynical, and demanding. A girl should also be a virgin. No girl will be a virgin unless she's a teenager.
it already happened to the roman empire.
for some fucking reason history keeps repeating
for some fucking reason history keeps repeating
Not true, you're seeing the old times way to positively, even napoleon and henry II got cheated on
B
he was an infidel himself with numerous mistresses.
Yeah but he only started to cheat on her when she cheated on him
B
idk about that. rumour was he was already breeding fatimahs in egyptian campaign before he heard news of his wife's infidelity. He also married her knowing full well she had numerous affairs in the past.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
