Venting If reproductive welfare should be collectivised, it should be among people who reproduce

[grondilu]

It should be founded by a tax that would be proportional to the number of kids you have. It can also depend on other variables (like income, from a leftist viewpoint), but it must be proportional to the number of kids.

The state would know how many kids a man has in at least two ways.

First, when a guy signs a birth certificate. In that case, there is no need to prove biological paternity. The guy, possibly a cuck, says he's the father, and that is all the State needs to know.

Second, when no man signs a birth certificate, the State can launch an investigation, ending with a mandatory paternity test. Once found, this biological father is absolutely not forced to get involved with his offspring. The mother doesn't even have to be informed about the result of the investigation (she wouldn't be in the dark about it if she wasn't promiscuous anyway). However, the number of kids this guy has is then officially incremented and from that point on he will have to pay the reproductive welfare tax accordingly.

 

[Mainländer]

Yes but it's more likely that bachelor taxes will be implemented than that, unfortunately. Very likely for men only on top of it. Just "man up", bro

 

[grondilu]

bachelor taxes

that would be a major ER fuel

 

[WawelDragon1683]

Considerding the below replacement birth rates in the west your proposition would make them even worse. Maybe that's a good thing, let this gay society colapse already.

 

[Mainländer]

that would be a major ER fuel

Tbh. Maybe they still didn't do it because they know it'll be pushing it too much.

 

[grondilu]

Considerding the below replacement birth rates in the west your proposition would make them even worse.

I don't care. That's not good enough an excuse IMHO.

Besides, I very much doubt the fear of taxes could force Chad and Tyrone into celibacy.

 

[your personality]

It should be founded by a tax that would be proportional to the number of kids you have. It can also depend on other variables (like income, from a leftist viewpoint), but it must be proportional to the number of kids.

The state would know how many kids a man has in at least two ways.

First, when a guy signs a birth certificate. In that case, there is no need to prove biological paternity. The guy, possibly a cuck, says he's the father, and that is all the State needs to know.

Second, when no man signs a birth certificate, the State can launch an investigation, ending with a mandatory paternity test. Once found, this biological father is absolutely not forced to get involved with his offspring. The mother doesn't even have to be informed about the result of the investigation (she wouldn't be in the dark about it if she wasn't promiscuous anyway). However, the number of kids this guy has is then officially incremented and from that point on he will have to pay the reproductive welfare tax accordingly.

Agreed but politicians are as usual doing things to make things worse for single males: https://theconversation.com/million...monthly-allowance-4-questions-answered-156834

Some people here though agree with this.

I will say that stuff like public education is beneficial in the sense that the economy benefits from having a relatively skilled, educated workforce, so I'm not entirely opposed to my tax dollars going to Chad and Stacy's kids.

 

[grondilu]

Some people here though agree with this.

Well, that's because it's the collectivist mindset and it's very popular nowadays.

 

[Psilocin99]

Yes but it's more likely that bachelor taxes will be implemented than that, unfortunately. Very likely for men only on top of it. Just "man up", bro

Just finance your own inceldom theory