94 percent of women who received anal sex in their last encounter said they reached orgasm.
slate.com
This one could be a false correlation: could mean that women more prone to having orgasms in general are prone to being sexually open-minded and trying anal-sex.
William Saletan of Slate in 2010 said:
94 percent of women who received anal sex in their last encounter said they reached orgasm—a higher rate of orgasm than was reported by women who had vaginal intercourse or received oral sex.
The proper way you would get stats here would be to look at this subset of "anal women who received anal sex" and then ask them "did you have an orgasm with your last vaginal sex?"
Even if that did underperform the 94% it wouldn't necessarily mean anything though.
It could just mean "foids prone to orgasm are prone to liking anal"
Not "therefore anal is better at achieving orgasm in all foids"
If I were to look at cognate male stats, if 99% of fags who beg for anal sex had orgasms this would not convince me that getting your ass fucked is a more reliable way to make men in general orgasm. It would only mean that of the % who like anal enough to do it, it works reliable for them.
Surprisingly, not oral.
metro.co.uk
Ellen Scott of Metro.uk in 2015 said:
with 94% of women achieving orgasm when they partook in anal.
Ellen is making the same flawed interpretation of data: this is not enough to establish a causatory relationship for the entire population.
Let's say out of 100 guys, 2 of them have a fetish for footjobs and coom 100% of the time from footjobs.
Of the other 98 guys, they only have vaginal sex, and coom 99% of the time.
This does not mean that as an absolute rule that footjobs are better for making guys coom than vaginas.
To assume that is drawing false unsupported conclusions for the data.
You're just assuming that what makes the foot-coomers coom reliably will make the non-foot-coomers coom reliable.
William Saletan and Ellen Scott are making the same assumptions about sphincter-queens vs non-sphincter queens.
In the case of Ellen's chart "received anal" was 31 women, while penile-vaginal was 730 and "received oral" was 263. You're talking about an extreme minority of the foid population here and just assuming what works for them works for others.
What I find really perplexing about this is how "gave oral" (at about 71% compared to "receives oral" at 81%) appears to outperform penile-vaginal at 66%
That's something to think about: foids are more likely to orgasm when they're sucking a cock compared to when they're getting fucked by one?
This makes it clear that it's not about the act: it's about Chad.
Chad is the guy they're willing to suck the cock of (they won't suck the cock of their beta husband/BF)
Chad is the guy they're wanting anal from (they won't take anal from their cucked BF)
This is the reason you would see these correlations: because the foids are prone to orgasming from the guy regardless of what he does, even if they are acts less inherently satisfying based on their mechanics.
Basically she's happy Chad is fucking her and that's why she cooms: she cooms from sucking his cock or from him fucking her intestinal poopies, doesn't matter.
Also perplexing here: men rank at 91% regardless of whether giving or receiving oral?
WTF is up with that?
Exactly what tier of beta soyboys out there are so fucking pent up that they actually ejaculate merely from a foid letting him lick her clit?
I can't help but think these statistics were polluted by "69" situations where the guy is actualling cooming due to a simultaneous BJ which has nothing to do with the fact he's reciprocating.
I bet if we compared "BJ alone" vs "BJ while I give cunnilingus" the former would at least tie if not exceed the latter.
There are guys who might get off more by "I'm pleasing her at the same time and hearing her moan" sure, but there's enough guys who like to look at a girl's face instead of her roastie folds that standalone BJ should hold much higher standing than 69ing, and we should expect to see "receives" have higher orgasm for men than "gives".
To get back to my "because faggots" explanation previously, look at the 100% ranking for men on orgasming under "receives anal"
This means 31/31 men polled who receive anal sex orgasm from it.
This doesn't mean anal sex is the best way to make men orgasm: it just means that being able to reliably get anal orgasms is a stronger motivator to habitually do it. Those not able to do it (ie non-faggots) would not do so, and thus be excluded from the data set.
If you compare this to the larger number of polled males (like say sum it with the 831 men who do vaginal sex, a total of 862 men) 31/862 is only about 3.5%
People would understand how this is bullshit if they made a claim like "anal sex is most effective way to give men an orgasm"
We would resist the urge and take a close look at the data and understand the faulty logic
ie Foid logic / soyboy logic
Yet because it's made about foids it somehow gets a pass from logic because reasons
EDIT:
Ellen said:
But men: don’t start reaching for the lube and confidently telling women that anal is the BEST way for them to achieve orgasm just yet.
The figure isn’t exactly an accurate representation of the most effective sex, orgasm-wise.
Only 31 of the women surveyed actually took part in anal sex, significantly reducing the size of the study’s anal sex related data sample.
It’s also possible that women who try anal sex are more open to trying different sexual acts, and may be more confident in bed, which might add to their abilities to achieve orgasm more reliably.
Actually, it seems like Ellen knows her title was bullshit clickbait, she exhibits understanding how the title misinterprets the data yet used it anyway.
If you're thinking of ways things can be gay then you're already gay stop denying it.
Are you hypothesizing that Roosh is gay?
Perhaps he hasn't fucked any women at all and just pretends to as a means of talking about sex to straight guys?
Interdasting
TBH never actually seen Roosh in a sex vid w/ a foid so I can't disprove your theory
Nor have I seen testimony from any foid claiming to have fucked him, but I haven't looked
Only actually fucking men is gay. Nothing else. Anal sex with females is thus not gay.
Roosh didn't say it was gay, he said it was a "gateway to" homosexuality
basically because you're moving from female-only parts to "parts both sexes have" (butt)
by that logic handjobs/blowjobs should have the same problem
Roosh is just shortsighted though because attraction to boobs (wanting boobjobs, suck tits, etc) are also a gateway due to the ease of making fake tits for trannies
Boobs were not traditionally a gateway to homosexuality because it did USED TO be just women who had them, but no longer.
This is why modern heterosexuality needs to be reframed to focus on subtler aspects of femininity like bone structure and virgin pussy itself.
Roastie pussy is a gateway into homosexuality too: it's all stretched out out of shape and is moving in the direction of the infected bleeding horror show that is tranny pussy.
Even if the pussy was somehow not stretched (let's say Chad only ever spurts his ejaculate inside her but never penetrates: she even has her hymen! proof you can be a non-virgin and still have a hymen) if she's taken creampies then she's been biochemically bonding with another man and becoming gradually masculinized over time, which also makes it a gateway into homosexuality.
