Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

I would muuuuuccchhhhhh rather have women value me for my body than what I bring to the table

blackpillednigga

blackpillednigga

Luminary
★★★★★
Joined
Jan 8, 2022
Posts
11,277
when foids whine constantly on social media about being in the receiving end of objectification and sexualization I fail to see how its a problem. if the genders were reversed and foids would constantly compliment my body why would that be worse than them only caring about my money and status? inb4 trannies on IT say something like "see how youd feel if a man did that to you" it's not the same because it's by the same sex you retarded soy chuggers
 
I'm thinking the difference is that women are disgusted by the bottom 85-95% of men. Them comparing how they feel when hit on by most men to how attractive men feel after being hit on by gay dudes just proves they perceive the majority of us completely asexually
 
Last edited:
I'm thinking the difference is that women are disgusted by the bottom 85-95% of men. I've heard them compare how they feel when hit on by most men to how attractive men feel after being hit on by a gay dude
and the reason why they're disgusted by most men is because they were spoiled since because of their SMV they can pick the top most attractive chads. if we had the same SMV we would choose stacies too and become disgusted by most foids
 
I don't see a point about betabuxxing, foid will only be there until money dries up. Same for being that stable but boring guy.
 
and the reason why they're disgusted by most men is because they were spoiled since because of their SMV they can pick the top most attractive chads. if we had the same SMV we would choose stacies too and become disgusted by most foids
Eh I disagree. The very fact that Chads sleep around with average foids disproves that men would be Stacy-only if put in the same position as women.

Don't get me wrong though, I definitely agree that the inflation of their options has led to an inflation of their standards. I just don't know if there was ever a time when sub-6 women were truly attracted to their looksmatches. Hypergamy has always existed in some form, it's just at its worst now
 
Last edited:
The bring to the table shit is just oofy doofy speech.
Also the gay fantasy things ITfags say is hilarious for how stupid it is.
 
If females were actually attracted to personality then I would prefer that. I want to be valued in the order of personality>looks>money/resources
 
Same, this is just common sense. I want to be wanted for me, not for working too hard and giving away all my hard earned money.
 
Although I actually don't mind when foids consider money in terms of long-term relationships, it's something legitimate to consider if you are wanting to start a family with someone, but obviously if they don't like who you are first then that relationship is doomed to fail.
 

Similar threads

Anthrofurrcel
Replies
7
Views
304
Lonely4Ever
Lonely4Ever
Deep.Nest
Replies
54
Views
2K
Wulfen
Wulfen
WeirdPanda
Replies
27
Views
704
Thugs-5-Less
Thugs-5-Less
JustAnotherCynic
Replies
6
Views
736
T. Normanno
T. Normanno
FatFoidHater69
Replies
27
Views
835
the kurdish loner
T

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top