HYPOTHESIS: I am willing to bet that the marriage-rate of physically-disabled/handicapped women vs. physically-disabled/handicapped men is at least 5/1 in favor of women being married over men.
We already know that the marriage rate of women vs. men, who are obese or depressed or whatever are very likely greater because these disabililities are somewhat subjective and are prone to being rationalised. This is something we can observe but not necessarily quantify which gives huge variance on the definitions alone. When I say physically-disabled I specifically am referring to someone who is permanently incapable of performing daily & routine duties...not someone who has carpal tunnel syndrome or flat-footed or something.
That said, legitimately physically-disabled members of either gender data SHOULD be much more stark and in favor of women being coupled. These statistics could be assessed within 10 minutes by most government health departments as who is reported as single, married or primary caregiver is denoted as being on any database-compiling software.
I wonder, if these statistics ever get compiled, HOW inceltears or bluepillers would COPE? How would you argue against almost any blackpill that is mentioned in any context with such clear-cut evidence in this one???? If women are much more likely to be coupled whilst being a burden on their partner wouldn't other blackpills also lean favorably for them?
Cliffs: Must be 6'ft tall, have solid-career & a special-needs equipped-transportation (leather seats preferred)
"Right this way, muh Queen!"
We already know that the marriage rate of women vs. men, who are obese or depressed or whatever are very likely greater because these disabililities are somewhat subjective and are prone to being rationalised. This is something we can observe but not necessarily quantify which gives huge variance on the definitions alone. When I say physically-disabled I specifically am referring to someone who is permanently incapable of performing daily & routine duties...not someone who has carpal tunnel syndrome or flat-footed or something.
That said, legitimately physically-disabled members of either gender data SHOULD be much more stark and in favor of women being coupled. These statistics could be assessed within 10 minutes by most government health departments as who is reported as single, married or primary caregiver is denoted as being on any database-compiling software.
I wonder, if these statistics ever get compiled, HOW inceltears or bluepillers would COPE? How would you argue against almost any blackpill that is mentioned in any context with such clear-cut evidence in this one???? If women are much more likely to be coupled whilst being a burden on their partner wouldn't other blackpills also lean favorably for them?
Cliffs: Must be 6'ft tall, have solid-career & a special-needs equipped-transportation (leather seats preferred)
"Right this way, muh Queen!"
Last edited:
