Selling sexual access is not particularly something which infuriates me TBH, that tends to be outrageous when combined with other factors like dishonesty. At least be honest you want the steal my burger and don't just pretend to like me until I offer you my burger. Can at least respect some honest predatory attitudes over hidden motives.
Nor is it only getting wet for 8ft tall square-jawed chads with 36 inch long dicks: I have minimal input over what gives me boners, I expect they've similar control over what gets them moist. Partner selection outrage tends to be combined with other factors, like hypocrisy/dishonesty or mean-spirited mockery.
If you would fuck bad men because you're sexually attracted to bad men, you could view that as just selfishly seeking sexual release, rather than giving rewards to the bad men. I think there's some level of disorder in being attracted to bad men, but I have experienced attraction to evil female characters (ie would fuck Lord Dominator and Asajj Ventress) so I can't get on too much of a pulpit about being willing to act out on such impulses if opportunity knocked.
I think what bothers me more isn't just that women will fuck bad men, but value that to such a high degree that they discard morality as a result.
I don't know if that's a conscious choice (the foid is immoral) or that she's so fixated on bad men fucking her that she actually rewrites reality to favor that man as some kind of antihero and throws anyone she doesn't want to fuck under the bus.
SIMP comes to mind, but rather than "simply idolizing mediocre cock" (SIMC?) I will acknowledge that perhaps chad's cock is better-than-mediocre and that it is amazing: the problem is not idolizing mediocre genitalia (SIMG?) but rather idolizing mediocre personalities/people just because you're attracted to their exception physique or combat abilities, with less focus on whether they misuse those talents by abusing others.
I could actually see us rewriting a new 2nd etymology of SIMP which applies to both sexes and is more PC which focuses on this problem: simply idolizing mediocre people/personalities. That's really what's being done after all: due to pussy, you idolize the girl attached to it: you're blinded to her immorality because you want to couple with her sexually. That's the real problem: if it were just about a vagina then it doesn't distinguish between those who enjoy sex w/ a foid without worshipping her (literal genital fixation) and those who worship the foid just because of the sexual access (or hope for it)
Getting back to conscious v. unconscious three paragraphs ago: this is the frustrating thing about being realistic: I don't jump to conclusions. I don't hold to a single explanation. I don't generalize.
I believe these two factors (willful immorality and unwilling immorality via delusion) are probably the two leading ones that are behind female degeneracy and how they will orbit and adopt favorable interpretations of immoral males they're attracted to.... there's probably some tertiary/etc stuff too that I'm not thinking of, these just stick out to me at this present moment.
I don't know if I'm going to bother to argue prominence... like if this is 40%/30% or 30%/40% ... I think it's close enough that it's not obvious, and also coming to a singular answer risks wrongfully generalizing women, when we can certainly see variations in what cause of degenerate immoral behavior on a lady-to-lady basis.
I think we want to believe it is delusion, because then all you would need to do is educate women enough that they reach a revelation about true reality. Believing delusion to be the most common primary contributor is an appealing explanation, and thus has high risk as a cope.
The thing about delusion is that too much of it is naturally selected against: you have to have some level of connection with reality. You would expect over time that brutal realistic immoralists would succeed and propagate over gentle unrealistic pseudomoralists.
OTOH delusion can foster more easily in women than in men though: women lead more sheltered and protected existences compared to men, so the forces of natural selection do not apply as directly to them as they do to us.
If what primary matters is how the forces of natural selection apply to the male guardians, then perhaps there are evolutionary advantages to believing your psychopath serial-killing cheating CEO husband is god's gift to humanity. By genuinely believing he is great and your rose-glasses turning a blind eye to his faults, you become a loyal wife who is able to coexist with his ego and receives the protection of his psychopathy as he competes against non-psychopathic males who lose in encounters because they are honorable: unwilling to lie, don't throw the first punch, don't poison their enemies, don't gaslight, etc/.
Nor is it only getting wet for 8ft tall square-jawed chads with 36 inch long dicks: I have minimal input over what gives me boners, I expect they've similar control over what gets them moist. Partner selection outrage tends to be combined with other factors, like hypocrisy/dishonesty or mean-spirited mockery.
If you would fuck bad men because you're sexually attracted to bad men, you could view that as just selfishly seeking sexual release, rather than giving rewards to the bad men. I think there's some level of disorder in being attracted to bad men, but I have experienced attraction to evil female characters (ie would fuck Lord Dominator and Asajj Ventress) so I can't get on too much of a pulpit about being willing to act out on such impulses if opportunity knocked.
I think what bothers me more isn't just that women will fuck bad men, but value that to such a high degree that they discard morality as a result.
I don't know if that's a conscious choice (the foid is immoral) or that she's so fixated on bad men fucking her that she actually rewrites reality to favor that man as some kind of antihero and throws anyone she doesn't want to fuck under the bus.
SIMP comes to mind, but rather than "simply idolizing mediocre cock" (SIMC?) I will acknowledge that perhaps chad's cock is better-than-mediocre and that it is amazing: the problem is not idolizing mediocre genitalia (SIMG?) but rather idolizing mediocre personalities/people just because you're attracted to their exception physique or combat abilities, with less focus on whether they misuse those talents by abusing others.
I could actually see us rewriting a new 2nd etymology of SIMP which applies to both sexes and is more PC which focuses on this problem: simply idolizing mediocre people/personalities. That's really what's being done after all: due to pussy, you idolize the girl attached to it: you're blinded to her immorality because you want to couple with her sexually. That's the real problem: if it were just about a vagina then it doesn't distinguish between those who enjoy sex w/ a foid without worshipping her (literal genital fixation) and those who worship the foid just because of the sexual access (or hope for it)
Getting back to conscious v. unconscious three paragraphs ago: this is the frustrating thing about being realistic: I don't jump to conclusions. I don't hold to a single explanation. I don't generalize.
I believe these two factors (willful immorality and unwilling immorality via delusion) are probably the two leading ones that are behind female degeneracy and how they will orbit and adopt favorable interpretations of immoral males they're attracted to.... there's probably some tertiary/etc stuff too that I'm not thinking of, these just stick out to me at this present moment.
I don't know if I'm going to bother to argue prominence... like if this is 40%/30% or 30%/40% ... I think it's close enough that it's not obvious, and also coming to a singular answer risks wrongfully generalizing women, when we can certainly see variations in what cause of degenerate immoral behavior on a lady-to-lady basis.
I think we want to believe it is delusion, because then all you would need to do is educate women enough that they reach a revelation about true reality. Believing delusion to be the most common primary contributor is an appealing explanation, and thus has high risk as a cope.
The thing about delusion is that too much of it is naturally selected against: you have to have some level of connection with reality. You would expect over time that brutal realistic immoralists would succeed and propagate over gentle unrealistic pseudomoralists.
OTOH delusion can foster more easily in women than in men though: women lead more sheltered and protected existences compared to men, so the forces of natural selection do not apply as directly to them as they do to us.
If what primary matters is how the forces of natural selection apply to the male guardians, then perhaps there are evolutionary advantages to believing your psychopath serial-killing cheating CEO husband is god's gift to humanity. By genuinely believing he is great and your rose-glasses turning a blind eye to his faults, you become a loyal wife who is able to coexist with his ego and receives the protection of his psychopathy as he competes against non-psychopathic males who lose in encounters because they are honorable: unwilling to lie, don't throw the first punch, don't poison their enemies, don't gaslight, etc/.
Last edited:
