I want black pill on money

[curryboy420]

I always wanted money and never got it, I want to hear things about money, I want to know how easy it is for normies to become rich and how normies are making 500 dollars a day and shit, it inspires a certain feeling in me that nothing else can. I really hate rich people.

 

[light]

"it takes money to make money. look at the fords but didnt they start that way?"

 

[Jud Pottah]

"it takes money to make money. look at the fords but didnt they start that way?"

make a new manufacture of cocoa choco niglet that moggs Milka mint bars THEORY

re-incel the wheel of Zeus
my fellow jites

 

[RandomGuy]

 

[curryboy420]

View attachment 1328619

This isn't what I meant but it works, it makes me angry and hate rich Jews more. These fucks don't provide any value the fuckung losers they just skim off everyone else's pie

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

Largely about IQ and that is largely about genetics. Would be the BP perspective on this.

 

[ilieknothing]

Start an Onlyfans

 

[Jud Pottah]

Start an Onlyfans

GingER ASMR

 

[proudweeb]

just buy VTSAX bro

 

[VintageCarCoper]

"it takes money to make money. look at the fords but didnt they start that way?"

 

[curryboy420]

Largely about IQ and that is largely about genetics. Would be the BP perspective on this.

It's not about iq at all lmao. Nikola tesla died penniless. It's all about your faggot parents and grandparents and how much they slaves and left for you to inherit. Every rich faggot has a grandad that worked in a factory for 30 years and left the fruits of their labour to their descendants.

 

[curryboy420]

Start an Onlyfans

I might get good at face swaping and swap faces of "real" girls onto celebrity pictures. Then manage to convince the jeets at onlyfans customer service that I am real and to verify me. And then rake in money by posting some face swapped shit once every few days on twitter and whatever. But it's not that easy. And I am not good at photoshop.

 

[Friezacel]

Lol what ? Making 500 a day is the exception and not the rule

 

[curryboy420]

Lol what ? Making 500 a day is the exception and not the rule

You would be surprised in England nigger and majority of these fucks do 8 hours total actual work in a week and make over 500 for it, which is the same thing in a way.

 

[Friezacel]

You would be surprised in England nigger and majority of these fucks do 8 hours total actual work in a week and make over 500 for it, which is the same thing in a way.

500 per day and 500 per week are 2 completely different things

 

[curryboy420]

500 per day and 500 per week are 2 completely different things

Nigger I know enough people in my life who have earned 500 plus a day. I have never made more than £100 in a day and that day was really not worth the grind in the warehouses

 

[OutcompetedByRoomba]

It's not about iq at all lmao. Nikola tesla died penniless.

You don't disprove a trend by citing a counter example.

It's all about your faggot parents and grandparents and how much they slaves and left for you to inherit. Every rich faggot has a grandad that worked in a factory for 30 years and left the fruits of their labour to their descendants.

It is all about parents. But the genes they gift you are more relevant to the average person than the money. There were multiple occasions throughout history where rich and powerful families were disowned and yet, 2-3 generations later, their children were once again among the elites of society. The plantation owners after the slaves got freed, in China and I think a few more Asian countries when the communists took over.

The west pretends like it's not a functional meritocracy because people and people of different races in particular don't achieve similar aka fair outcomes. But that is down to the true root cause of inequality, genetic inequality. Intelligence, diligence, conscientiousness, ambition. All of those are partially down to your genetics and all of those play a big role in how far you can climb the societal ladder, both in terms of status and money.


A few quotes from this paper: https://gwern.net/doc/iq/ses/2022-marks.pdf

Parents' education and family income only weakly account for the variation (7% and 6%) in personal (IHS transformed) income in the early and mid-career (Model1, Table 9).

Cognitive ability accounts for more of the variance in offspring's income than parents' education and family income: 15% in the NLSY79 and 17% in the NLSY97 (model 2). The g coefficients were much the same: a one standard deviation difference in ability is associated with a about a 40% increase in average personal income for ages 25 to 39.

Comparing model 3 to model 1, the coefficients for parents' education on income are no longer statistically significant when considering cognitive ability. The coefficients for family income are almost halved. Conversely, with the addition of parents' education and family income, the coefficients for cognitive ability decline only marginally: 10% for the NLSY79 and only 3% for the NLSY97.

Table A1 indicates parental income and wealth are not strong predictors of income in the NLSY79. A doubling of parental income is associated with a 16% increase in average income from ages 25 to 39. The corresponding effect for parental wealth is 3%. Contrary to Bowles and Gintis's (2002b, pp. 3–4) assertions, parental income is not as important for income as educational attainment.

Model 1 shows that a one-year difference in parents' education is associated with an 11% increase in positive wealth in NLSY79 and a 9% increase in the NLSY97. Without considering other influences, a doubling of family-of-origin income is associated with a 40% increase in positive wealth in the NLSY79 and a 21% increase in the NLSY97. This compares to increases of 75% and68% for a one-standard deviation increase in cognitive ability (Table 3).

And then just the entire Discussion part. The first paragraph gives a good idea:

The conclusions from this study are contrary to dominant narratives
about the reproduction of socioeconomic inequalities in Western coun-
tries. Parents' education - which is often considered the most important
socioeconomic background factor - together with accurate measures of
family income could only account for moderate amounts of the variance
in stratification outcomes: about 10% for school grades, 15 to 20% for
SAT and ACT scores, around 20% for educational attainment; 15 to 20%
for occupational attainment, and less than 10% for income. Cognitive
ability is a far more powerful influence, accounting for 3 times more of
the variance in school grades, three to five times more variation in SAT
and ACT performance, over 30% of the variance in educational attain-
ment, and 20 to 30% of the variance in occupational attainment and
income. The ‘race of the variables’ is not even close.

This isn't to say that the top <1% don't profit massively from the wealth their parents gift them. But that's not the majority of the population. In general, rich people not only have money to bequeath, they also have genes they pass on to their children. And, on average, those are the real driver of inequality, be it in terms of money, intelligence or looks. That idea is pretty much the core of the blackpill.

 

[curryboy420]

You don't disprove a trend by citing a counter example.

It is all about parents. But the genes they gift you are more relevant to the average person than the money. There were multiple occasions throughout history where rich and powerful families were disowned and yet, 2-3 generations later, their children were once again among the elites of society. The plantation owners after the slaves got freed, in China and I think a few more Asian countries when the communists took over.

The west pretends like it's not a functional meritocracy because people and people of different races in particular don't achieve similar aka fair outcomes. But that is down to the true root cause of inequality, genetic inequality. Intelligence, diligence, conscientiousness, ambition. All of those are partially down to your genetics and all of those play a big role in how far you can climb the societal ladder, both in terms of status and money.


A few quotes from this paper: https://gwern.net/doc/iq/ses/2022-marks.pdf










And then just the entire Discussion part. The first paragraph gives a good idea:


This isn't to say that the top <1% don't profit massively from the wealth their parents gift them. But that's not the majority of the population. In general, rich people not only have money to bequeath, they also have genes they pass on to their children. And, on average, those are the real driver of inequality, be it in terms of money, intelligence or looks. That idea is pretty much the core of the blackpill.

Bro Nikola tesla was iq moggong every single person on the world and he still was poor that's a pretty big counter example. And who cares if 2 generations later your family is rich... I want the money now, in my youth. What's the point of being smart, genetic recombination means that you may be ultra smart but your faggot grandkids who inherit all your hard work might be drooling fucking retards who don't even deserve it. It really is all luck isn't it. Fuck this world.

 

[curryboy420]

You don't disprove a trend by citing a counter example.

It is all about parents. But the genes they gift you are more relevant to the average person than the money. There were multiple occasions throughout history where rich and powerful families were disowned and yet, 2-3 generations later, their children were once again among the elites of society. The plantation owners after the slaves got freed, in China and I think a few more Asian countries when the communists took over.

The west pretends like it's not a functional meritocracy because people and people of different races in particular don't achieve similar aka fair outcomes. But that is down to the true root cause of inequality, genetic inequality. Intelligence, diligence, conscientiousness, ambition. All of those are partially down to your genetics and all of those play a big role in how far you can climb the societal ladder, both in terms of status and money.


A few quotes from this paper: https://gwern.net/doc/iq/ses/2022-marks.pdf










And then just the entire Discussion part. The first paragraph gives a good idea:


This isn't to say that the top <1% don't profit massively from the wealth their parents gift them. But that's not the majority of the population. In general, rich people not only have money to bequeath, they also have genes they pass on to their children. And, on average, those are the real driver of inequality, be it in terms of money, intelligence or looks. That idea is pretty much the core of the blackpill.

Also im in India and the richest people her are a bunch of fat ugly smelly fat ass Indians like Ambani and his fat nigger son.

 

[light]

its about connections and being born into wealth

 

[Emba]

Start an Onlyfans

I started one now I have to keep paying to not get deleted

 

[RandomGuy]

This isn't what I meant but it works, it makes me angry and hate rich Jews more. These fucks don't provide any value the fuckung losers they just skim off everyone else's pie

An old Jew taught me sum tricks.

Read BARRON’S on the weekend and trade only early Monday. Remember, the stock market isn’t open on weekends so it’s an even playing field Monday morning. Information is Key — Billionaires read Barron’s and moves markets.

Some use Moomoo.


View: https://youtube.com/shorts/fTiDEI32kn0?si=Hvux7NXL_k3zotDs


View: https://youtu.be/6rCkpez1xhU?si=JqquKTNTnh-ZYRn1

 

[CEO of Simps]

Start an Onlyfans

 

[curryboy420]

An old Jew taught me sum tricks.

Read BARRON’S on the weekend and trade only early Monday. Remember, the stock market isn’t open on weekends so it’s an even playing field Monday morning. Information is Key — Billionaires read Barron’s and moves markets.

Some use Moomoo.


View: https://youtube.com/shorts/fTiDEI32kn0?si=Hvux7NXL_k3zotDs


View: https://youtu.be/6rCkpez1xhU?si=JqquKTNTnh-ZYRn1

I'm not going to play this faggot rigged shit. Fuck that. Fuck all the Jew systems I ain't playing them now.

 

[XtremeMax]

i need money to get more drunk

 

[curryboy420]

i need money to get more drunk

Yeah and I need money to buy some weed that actually tastes nice for once. It's been too long since I enjoyed smoking the joint properly. All the bud I can get for my prices is trash.

 

[XtremeMax]

Yeah and I need money to buy some weed that actually tastes nice for once. It's been too long since I enjoyed smoking the joint properly. All the bud I can get for my prices is trash.

i wish i knew where to buy weed. my country is VERY strict about it.

 

[curryboy420]

i wish i knew where to buy weed. my country is VERY strict about it.

I thought you were german or something for some reason

I'm in India and there is no weed here. Absolue trash weed that I don't even wanna smoke and it's too expensive. That's all I found. The police will put you in Indian prison for a year for drugs, before the court hearing. And Indian prison is absolute fucked. Like 20 guys in 1 cell and no room to do anything at all.

 

[XtremeMax]

I thought you were german or something for some reason

I'm in India and there is no weed here. Absolue trash weed that I don't even wanna smoke and it's too expensive. That's all I found. The police will put you in Indian prison for a year for drugs, before the court hearing. And Indian prison is absolute fucked. Like 20 guys in 1 cell and no room to do anything at all.

idk why its so strict in some countries. its stupid as shit.

i hope you get some good weed though brocel