Overdosed
"Grass" said she has a BF
★★
- Joined
- May 25, 2021
- Posts
- 598
Obsessing over their own intelligence, especially when it comes to dating, is a one of the biggest coping mechanisms. Even normalfag chadlites fall into the trap that women should be dripping over their cognitive abilities, while all of us fail to complicate our expectation of smartness from girls we want. Whenever we think of the positive aspect of IQ and mate selection is always as understanding (good listening, agreeableness, empathy, charismatic, etc.) and non of us really give a shit whether or not our oneitises gets a 100% on a math quiz or has a PhD. Few guys think they want smart women, when really they want is reliable companionship, which is not the equivalent!
The situation is similar to women-they want regardless of how high the average IQ point they possess.
There is a negative correlation between (actual, opposed to perceived) brilliance and sexual success, even among women.
I suspect the reason why is due to IQcels being high inhib.
Sexhavers meanwhile are generally low inhib.
In all probability, it's likely most of us aren't different than the general population (terms of intelligence). Yes, we have deduced our observation and arrived to the darkest truth-the blackpill, this doesn't mean we're smarter than straight A students. Very few IQ NTs come to the conclusion of the blackpill on their own because most are often deeply woven with their prepositions (the ). In fact, it may get worse as more cognitive one becomes.
At the same time, we were/are exposed to the blackpill, forcing us to change our prepositions. This is why bluepillers can never understand inceldom. Menstrual pads and Chads never been in our shoes, most guys are deaf by societal lies, so we're simply beyond their comprehension.Making them inadequate to identify who we really are (not terrorists), much less address our problems (perpetual female rejection).
If you're still assuming that you're an unrecognized genius, while incapable solving your reproductive problem, then fundamentally your IQ points is biologically meaningless. You may rationalize your situation by thinking you don't care, hoping you'll won't ever have to face the fact you never had the option to care, but you'll be agreeing with the meaninglessness of your intelligence all the same.
TL;DR: Unless its has been proven useful concurrently, no gives a fuck about how smart someone is romantically, not even you. We're probably not as intelligent as many of us claim, but that don't make our conclusions/prepositions incorrect like the bluepill.
The situation is similar to women-they want regardless of how high the average IQ point they possess.
https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/cis/reis/2017/00000159/00000159/art00007For men, the results show that being unattractive decreases the likelihood of finding a partner, of finding a partner with a university degree, and of finding a partner with a higher educational level.
There is a negative correlation between (actual, opposed to perceived) brilliance and sexual success, even among women.
IQ
IQ or intelligence quotient is the test score of a test meant to measure general or specific cognitive abilities. IQ tests contain basic cognitive tasks that do...
incels.wiki
I suspect the reason why is due to IQcels being high inhib.
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0165176519300709the correlation coefficients between IQ and willingness to take risks and patience are −0.60 and 0.46. The coefficient estimates of IQ are all statistically significant...
results suggest that countries with high IQ populations are more risk averse and more patient than countries with low IQ populations. The positive correlation between patience and IQ corroborates the empirical evidence based on micro data. High IQ populations tend to be more patient because intelligent people have longer time horizons.
Sexhavers meanwhile are generally low inhib.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07418825.2016.1216153Men who show a willingness to take risks, have a high self-esteem, and a body that is physically imposing possess qualities that women may find desirable, but these qualities are also correlated with aggressive behavior...A broadly held preference among women for partners who embodythese qualities may result in physically aggressive men being favored for sex.Thus because of female biases in mate selection, it follows that any observed link between men’s sexual behavior and their involvement in violence may be explained not as a direct result of men competing, but rather as a by-product of women choosing men on the basis of qualities which happen to correlate with physical aggression.
In all probability, it's likely most of us aren't different than the general population (terms of intelligence). Yes, we have deduced our observation and arrived to the darkest truth-the blackpill, this doesn't mean we're smarter than straight A students. Very few IQ NTs come to the conclusion of the blackpill on their own because most are often deeply woven with their prepositions (the ). In fact, it may get worse as more cognitive one becomes.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0963721413480174The magnitude of the myside bias shows very little relation to intelligence. Avoiding myside bias is thus one rational thinking skill that is not assessed by intelligence tests or even indirectly indexed through its correlation with cognitive ability measure
https://content.apa.org/record/2012-14753-001we found that none of these bias blind spots were attenuated by measures of cognitive sophistication such as cognitive ability or thinking dispositions related to bias. If anything, a larger bias blind spot was associated with higher cognitive ability.
At the same time, we were/are exposed to the blackpill, forcing us to change our prepositions. This is why bluepillers can never understand inceldom. Menstrual pads and Chads never been in our shoes, most guys are deaf by societal lies, so we're simply beyond their comprehension.Making them inadequate to identify who we really are (not terrorists), much less address our problems (perpetual female rejection).
If you're still assuming that you're an unrecognized genius, while incapable solving your reproductive problem, then fundamentally your IQ points is biologically meaningless. You may rationalize your situation by thinking you don't care, hoping you'll won't ever have to face the fact you never had the option to care, but you'll be agreeing with the meaninglessness of your intelligence all the same.
TL;DR: Unless its has been proven useful concurrently, no gives a fuck about how smart someone is romantically, not even you. We're probably not as intelligent as many of us claim, but that don't make our conclusions/prepositions incorrect like the bluepill.