Ledgemund said:
Yes, but is obvious that different races look different and, though this is unduly contentious, generally act differently.
And I intend to change the looks part of it, and as for "acts" pert of it, I shall take the best from all races and kill off the rest. I shall supersede the "general" pert of it and take the best of the best with me only.
Ledgemund said:
broadly different phenotypes tend to have emerged toward different ends. Race does have utility in categorizing people, on averages, by certain physical and mental parameters. It is not "structural inequality" that keeps Koreans underrepresented in the NBA, naturally. But when you extend this line of thinking to matters of social organization, education, etc. - matters of mental acuity and patterns of behavior - people tend to lose their minds. This isn't meant to introduce any conception of "value" to the issue, only distinctness. There is objective talent and aptitude, but they exist in manifold forms.
The problem here is that I don't intend to work on "averages" as if everyone is the exact same. For every overachiever there is bound to be an underachiever. I don't plan to drag any of these dregs of any ethnicity with me. Once you get the best of the best from all races, those member's ethnicity "averages" (which they are above EVERY ETHNICITY'S) won't count for shit. Even if pygmy's on average are short, I'd be a dead men long before you tell me that you can tolerate mixing pygmys of tall stature with everyone else.
Ledgemund said:
The issue with this is that race and culture have coevolved together in relative isolation, with the latter to some degree even being an epiphenomenon of the former.
I would then argue for the extermination of said cultures that you speak of being correlated to race. I'm a proud Indian, and one of the infinite reasons being that my culture is NOT IN ANY WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, bound to race. I hate with no end Jews for having their race bound to culture. If you want, you're more than welcome to assimilate into Indian culture and I will accept you as my bhai, are the freakshows known as jews willing to do the same?
On the topic of race and religion, my sentiments remain the same, and even more amplified one could argue. I'm a proud Hindu because we see no race barriers, and our goal is not the eternal endless worship of a race, but rather transcendence of the prison called "the world" itself. The slime of humanity known as jews, however, only seek to eternally worship their race and harm others. I wish the holocaust would've happened, really. Hitler should've done that.
Ledgemund said:
How have all these populations ended up differently if not for years and years of dialectical interaction with their environments?
Through tribalism and war, cuckoldry for the females will for power and good genes. You see why I don't like this race nationalism shit? It's because I post on
INCELS.me and not r/Cuckold.
Ledgemund said:
Some ethnicities have become suited to dealing with harsh winters, some to predatory wildlife, some to certain natural disasters
Those are, again "averages". I plan to take the best of the best
everywhere. If you can't handle both the Thar Desert and Siberia and not face any problems, I don't care whether you're Russian or Rajasthani, no kids for you.
Ledgemund said:
That the two are so tightly interwoven is what has again and again destroyed the hurried and abstractly derived "rational" values of modern society.
See above.
Ledgemund said:
It is colossal hubris to think that a couple of men can, in. a few years, set down a universal set of values de novo that will be adequate replacement for distinct ones that have emerged through millennia of environmental necessity and cross-generational scholarship.
It is not hubris but duty. If you refuse to pledge allegiance to One Incelistan and instead remain to your tribalistic war-mongering cuckoldry, you will be replaced.
Ledgemund said:
How do we pilfer from among the mixed heap of values what is "purposeful" and who do we trust to do it?
English? I mean, I'm not a white supremacist, but like, I know SOME English....
Ledgemund said:
hat's not to say that different groups of people can't coexist and get along, but I am expressly against investing hope in the semi-rational production of some kind of generic, aracial "new man". And by what means? Female sexual selection?
Don't overreact that your females aren't creating war for once. Incelistan shall take the Highest IQ, Most fit, and those most Originally Noble to carry us on. The Aracial man will be smart, fit and noble and Loyal to Incelistan.
Ledgemund said:
I am firmly against colonial/expansionist adventurism and think that the solution would be rather to focus on tightly controlling the scale of resource use within nations so that the drive toward territorial expansion could be avoided.
Or better yet, one world order so that anyone from any parameter at all, whether race, hair color, favorite cartoon, etc. may be exposed and dealt with. Sure, you've isolated and divided man and set upon his genetic cuckold genes to go to war for what females have created for their own profit, but who's to say we stop there? Soon some "hair nationalists" will emerge one day and divide our ethnostates into their own hair states, and then we'll continue this division until every man's home is a separate nation.
Ledgemund said:
"Meritocracy" is allegedly what we have in the degenerate West, but has always proven to be a sleight of the hand, a phantom of social control. Bootstraps, etc. People naturally evince more loyalty toward people like themselves and the sooner that this is recognized will be the sooner that the value of autonomous structures may be realized.
It's true then, as you admit, we don't have meritocracy in the west. Which is why we should actually do it for once and not blame it for the crimes of those who've never tried it.
Ledgemund said:
Eh, whether they're White or ethnic, most people - regular posters too, not infiltrators - cannot refrain from dragging race into just about every conversation. I take that as corroborative evidence of its primacy in matters of apportionment in "multicultural" societies and its particular relevance to the Hurenfrage.
No. I instead take it that these are the people who seek to divide us and destroy us for their own tribe's (read: females) benefit, as well as an affirmation to the Aryanist theory of Original Nobility. Rather than letting these mortal fools divide Incelistan, I say we kill them.
Ledgemund said:
Inceldom probably wouldn't be nearly the problem it is now in small-scale homogenous societies
Sure, it's not like that's what happens in history and the current day in Biology across species, where the female shall create the tribe and send her beta cucks to kill one another for Chad. Keep dreaming, but when you have to fight someone so your tribal princess can marry a White Chad, don't say "B-but the Aryanists never told me that this would happen!"
Ledgemund said:
Cross-tribal belligerence would exist of course
And that's a bad thing.
Ledgemund said:
i.e. nationalism is preventative, not reactive.
Real nationalism is against dividing the nation on cuckold parameters. Stop hiding your racism and cuckoldry as nationalism.
Ledgemund said:
That's not something that's ever going to materialize at this point
Don't be a wuss, fucking go for it.
Ledgemund said:
It is necessary now, rather, that incels work, against deep drives, to put aside all of their differences and cooperate toward propagandizing feminist hegemony off of the minds of all men.
This is Incelistan. We put aside our differences and work as one.
Ledgemund said:
How do you imagine anti-degeneracy being a valid concept in a rootless society?
Anti-degeneracy itself is logical, not mindless. I know that anti-degeneracy is logically correct, not that "I'm X because my tribalist parents were, so there I go!". In many cases, people like jews, for example, are examples of roots we want to destroy fully, completely, and wholly. Those types of roots are the
cause and NOT solution of degeneracy.
incelgration said:
That's why multiculturalism never works
It's not that multiculturalism never works, it's that females should have literally 0 power. You, for example, can't cite female leaders as a valid reason for anarchism. Multiculturalism has had the gun stuck to it's head by females, we, as the moral folk against all crime, should stand side by side by this victim.
Berserker123 said:
Race mixing only helps the sub human races like blacks and mexicans and curries. Of course these sub humans are pro race mixing as they can't do any worst. But for whites, race mixing only produce lesser humans and destroy their own future generation.
How in tarnation are ethnicites superior to one another?
SoCalSuifuel said:
Trump is the biggest anti-racist in the world
He's one of the biggest racists out there KEK
SoCalSuifuel said:
you need to become a full-fledged National Socialist it's the only way. Race mixing destroys the natural diversity of the Earth by turning everyone into the same mongrel sludge.
If Hitler were alive, he'd skin you alive. Do you really think he wanted low IQ people mixing with the High IQ ones, or the Ignoble ones mixing with the Aryans?
or 
