They are cucks, having sex with escorts is not the real thing and never will be.
It's only cucked if you view it as being the real thing.
I would love a GF to make me a delicious meal for free, but that doesn't mean it's cucked to pay to have a meal made for me at a restaurant.
Cuck requires you are being deceived.
It derives from the idea of a non-cuckoo mommy sitting on eggs she thinks are her own but are actually the eggs of the cuckoo-bird mommy who laid them there after smashing the cucked mommy's eggs.
If you're not being deceived then you're not being cucked.
Though generally this refers to other people actively deceiving you (ie your wife fucked your mailman and you're raising the mailman's babies)
It can also extend to passive self-deception such as
1) "the girl I am in an open relationship with and paying rent for is not dating other guys"
2) "of all the people funding this OnlyFans girl, I am the only one she cares for and some day we will meet up and get married"
Any use of "cucked" needs to explain the deception. We should probably divide it into groups, like there's self-cucking intracucking (self-deception) and extracucking (deception by others)
These don't tend to be mutually exclusive: I expect 50% of the time when a wife is deceiving a guy, he's probably also self-deceiving on some level giving her trust she hasn't earned.
At least I know not to pay £70 to fuck a gross hooker loose cunt who takes multiple guys everyday.
I've been wondering about this guys.
We tend to accept the idea that guys with huge dicks have fewer problems getting sex than guys with small dicks.
Wouldn't it stand to reason that most of the customers of prostitutes would have small dicks?
If that's the case then why would we expect hookers to have loose vaginas?
If a hooker has a loose vagina it's probably not from any of her small-dicked clients, but rather from her non-client gigachad boyfriend with a 12-inch diameter penis.
If that's the case then non-prostitutes probably have such boyfriends too, so I'd question whehther prostitutes would necessarily be looser than non-prostitutes.
In fact, we should even explore the idea that prostitutes could have TIGHTER pussies than non-prostitutes.
Prostitutes would have a financial incentive to maintain a tight pussy via a combination of kegel exercises and avoiding large dick, because her tightness is directly tied to her ability to service small-dicked clients and earn money from them.
Non-prostitute GFs have pathetic betabux BF orbiting them and willing to tolerate her loose pussy. He's emotionally invested in her and is less picky than a detached client. So non-prostitute GFs could have secret liasons with giant-dicked gigachads and get away with it, whereas this could harm the business model of a prostitute.
A prostitute most likely will want to keep at least one of her holes (vagina or anus) tight for servicing small-dicked clients, so if she fucks a gigachad BF on the side for free she'll probably limit him to just one of those holes, so as to keep the other tight to guarantee reliable income for herself.
Non-prostitute GFs otoh probably let their gigachad giant-dick BFs stretch out BOTH holes because their income is less directly tied to having a tight hole for small-dicked betabuxers.
Of course this doesn't apply to prostitutes who can get by on handjobs/blowjobs alone, they can stretch out both holes. But I expect you don't make as much money that way.
Non-prositute GFs otoh can probably exclusively do handjob/blowjob with the occasional starfish loose-pussy fuck.
There are limits that you can go to before you lose your dignity. If you will suffer any indignity to be with a woman then you are beyond weak.
Dignity is subjective though.
Like some guys find it undignified to provide cunnilingus while others are okay with doing that.
Fucking a prostitute is pathetic, and I have enough self respect to rather be an incel than to pay for it or to allow myself to be used in some other way.
Pathetic is also subjective.
Like for example I'm sure we'd love a free back massage from a loving GF but does that make it pathetic if we pay a masseuse to do it?
Isn't it more pathetic to deny ourselves pampered back muscles because we can only accept such a service on the grounds of thinking it comes from a selfless source?
What if we can never convince ourselves the source is selfless? No back massage EVER?
I say this as guy who is still too high-inhib to pay for masseuse tbh, but hypothetically I think I should, once the 'Rona is over
