
Deleted member 24297
With the intent to inflict death
-
- Joined
- Jan 29, 2020
- Posts
- 2,333
After many years I finally solved it.
Pepe? Is that you?View attachment 379787
my attempt
Oh... The pic looks like a smiling pepe tbhngl
IQmogs me.Mathematically, the problem can be formulated in terms of graph drawings of the complete bipartite graph K3,3. The three utilities problem is the question of whether this graph is a planar graph.
It is possible to show that any bridgeless bipartite planar graph with V vertices and E edges has E ≤ 2V − 4 by combining the Euler formula V − E + F = 2 (where F is the number of faces of a planar embedding) with the observation that the number of faces is at most half the number of edges (the vertices around each face must alternate between houses and utilities, so each face has at least four edges, and each edge belongs to exactly two faces). In the utility graph, E = 9 and 2V − 4 = 8, violating this inequality, so the utility graph cannot be planar.
Isn't this also some kind of autism? High IQ thoughMathematically, the problem can be formulated in terms of graph drawings of the complete bipartite graph K3,3. The three utilities problem is the question of whether this graph is a planar graph.
It is possible to show that any bridgeless bipartite planar graph with V vertices and E edges has E ≤ 2V − 4 by combining the Euler formula V − E + F = 2 (where F is the number of faces of a planar embedding) with the observation that the number of faces is at most half the number of edges (the vertices around each face must alternate between houses and utilities, so each face has at least four edges, and each edge belongs to exactly two faces). In the utility graph, E = 9 and 2V − 4 = 8, violating this inequality, so the utility graph cannot be planar.
IQmogs me.
How was I wrong though?
Isn't this also some kind of autism? High IQ though