I
Ika-Sama
Recruit
-
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2020
- Posts
- 17,799
Rest in peace, my Red brothers.


Last edited:
Based, couldn't agree more.Death to united states.
Fuck them. Deserved.Rest in peace, my Red brothers.
![]()
![]()
No
That isn't confirmed, also some attacks were provoked by the settlers on the land. Some tribes were peaceful and welcomed Europeans, some weren't. Europeans aren't really innocent.Fuck them. Deserved.
The native Americans almost ALWAYS attacked first, from Christopher Columbus to roanoak to the massacres on the frontier
Some sure, but for the most part no.That isn't confirmed, also some attacks were provoked by the settlers on the land.
Most of them weren’t. And I’d consider moving a continent forward 100,000 years from mud huts to railroad and city takes all guilt away.Some tribes were peaceful and welcomed Europeans, some weren't. Europeans aren't really innocent.
And while they were behind everyone else, it didn't warrant almost genociding them. The only reason they are on welfare today is because the U.S gov't displaced them and forced them into barren lands, and forcefully too. Not to mention the caste system created by Spaniards in South America. I've seen how Post-Colonialism fucks up the minds of ethnics.living 10,000 years behind everyone else, even the Africans tech and civilization mogged them. We built civilizations and greatness where there was mud huts and tipi’s.
Now they are just reliant douchetubes on govt aid. Ironic how Indians complain about whitey so much but all they do is get drunk and live off of the US reparations they get.
No
This, also a funny story is that iirc the Comanche tribe would kidnap aryan girls to make them brides jfl, they were simps but unironically they were murderous and barely civilised, people always have sympathy for murderers when someone murders themnative americans were very cruel people just like all Mongoloids. they repeatedly massacred entire civilian population men women children when they could. one time they wiped out 30% of the Virginia colony population. i have no symphathy to their "plight".
The genocides were in retaliation. Such as the trail of tears, which started AFTER the creek red sticks started scalping thousands of American settlers. You don’t just start something then play the victim after you’ve lost so hard.And while they were behind everyone else, it didn't warrant almost genociding them.
The reason they are on welfare today is because they are drunkards, just like how they were drunkards in 1800. they get billions of dollars of reperations a year and free college. Even blacks don’t get nearly as much govt aid as they do, and THEY do better. This racial-wide drunkard trait (RACIAL-WIDE, as ALL of them have it) and the way they acted is proof they are a race simply not fit for human advancement. They are not compatible racially with the modern world, which is a different plain of existence even compared to blacks. The Indians share that trait with the aboriginals.The only reason they are on welfare today is because the U.S gov't displaced them and forced them into barren lands, and forcefully too. Not to mention the caste system created by Spaniards.
Northern American Natives weren't necessarily advanced as compared to their Southern counterparts, but we do know that the Mayan, Incan and few other empires existed. Maybe it's because the Natives were content with their way of life that they didn't advance, they were a semi-nomadic people.The genocides were in retaliation. Such as the trail of tears, which started AFTER the creek red sticks started scalping thousands of American settlers. You don’t just start something then play the victim after you’ve lost so hard.
The reason they are on welfare today is because they are drunkards, just like how they were drunkards in 1800. they get billions of dollars of reperations a year and free college. Even blacks don’t get nearly as much govt aid as they do, and THEY do better. This racial-wide drunkard trait (RACIAL-WIDE, as ALL of them have it) and the way they acted is proof they are a race simply not fit for human advancement. They are not compatible racially with the modern world, which is a different plain of existence even compared to blacks. The Indians share that trait with the aboriginals.
It is obvious they are an inferior race that did nothing with a whole resource rich continent, fought the white man who did and now they’re bitching moaning and complaining just like everyone else. They have no moral high ground to stand on especially when talking in a microphone, on a phone, using the internet, and getting enough money to make every Indian a millionaire if he didn’t spend so much on Jack Daniels.
Couldn’t care about the south, they couldn’t write a damn thing down and they got killed by less than 2,000 swarthy Spaniards.Northern American Natives weren't necessarily advanced as compared to their Southern counterparts, but we do know that the Mayan, Incan and few other empires existed.
You are not content with your life when you are living like that. Europeans and Asians were content with their life, and they kept advancing. Africa, America and Oceania weren’t content, they were living like shit but were too dumb to advance themselves like Europeans or Asians or IndiansMaybe it's because the Natives were content with their way of life that they didn't advance, they were a semi-nomadic people.
It's a to me mystery why Africa/America didn't advance tbh. I think Africa's main issue is an harsh geography and a Sahara desert barring trade. No clue for America.Couldn’t care about the south, they couldn’t write a damn thing down and they got killed by less than 2,000 swarthy Spaniards.
You are not content with your life when you are living like that. Europeans and Asians were content with their life, and they kept advancing. Africa, America and Oceania weren’t content, they were living like shit but were too dumb to advance themselves like Europeans or Asians or Indians
Not at all. Neither of them are properly integrated into their respective societies (They never benefited from the wealth accumulated by whites), and have to deal with marginalization and racism from the dominant majority. Most Whites see them as subhuman, hence why they were almost wiped out.It positively affected native tribes of America in long term perspective, same with Australia (besides the replacement of their own population and conflicts that they had to endure)
It ain't like Africa and India who didn't got wiped out when they got introduced to Western technology.Im pro colonialism, it positively affected native tribes of America in long term perspective, same with Australia (besides the replacement of their own population and conflicts that they had to endure)
They probably get discriminated from getting a job, and suffer from poverty.But they have more job opportunities, they live in a developed country with decent health care and don't have to worry about starving to death as they can go to the walmart
What's wrong with being Injun? Say the same thing to an Catholic Irishman in Ulster or a Berber in North Africa.Its still better than leading a tribal lifestyle plus they can benefit from affirmative action or sth contrary to wypipo so idk
??? BS. They benefit from the wealth because native Americans and aboriginals especially get billions of dollars a year. And racism? They don’t experience racism at all. Look at how much publicity their bitching gets. If they were dealing with racism you wouldn’t hear their complaining.Not at all. Neither of them are properly integrated into their respective societies (They never benefited from the wealth accumulated by whites), and have to deal with marginalization and racism from the dominant majority. Most Whites see them as subhuman, hence why they were almost wiped out.
They get atleast half a billion dollars per year, but most of the money does not go to individual Natives. There might be mismanagement with the funds, but that's the people at the top, not the bottom.??? BS. They benefit from the wealth because native Americans and aboriginals especially get billions of dollars a year. And racism? They don’t experience racism at all. Look at how much publicity their bitching gets. If they were dealing with racism you wouldn’t hear their complaining.
Not to mention they also have seperate rules and laws, so less taxes (and it goes to them through their bureau) and they can do shit like casinos.
Oh and also they have all our technology. Their phones, cars, Jean jackets, everything they use even their festival cultural shit was made by us or using our technology
Rest in peace, red niggas.
Berbers are next.Rest in peace, red niggas.
You hope Berbers go the way of Native Americans?I hope so.
Death to united states.
While I do sympathize with them, I agree that many Native American tribes were fucking vicious. I'm one of the few people of Native ancestry that will admit this. I'm definitely not one of those people that think America was some kind of peaceful Eden before Europeans camenative americans were very cruel people just like all Mongoloids. they repeatedly massacred entire civilian population men women children when they could. one time they wiped out 30% of the Virginia colony population. i have no symphathy to their "plight".
Nah bro they get every penny. I talked to an Indian once and they all get free college and enough money to live. This person wasn’t even from a casino tribe, it was a literally who? Tribe in the middle of the desert.They get atleast half a billion dollars per year, but most of the money does not go to individual Natives. There might be mismanagement with the funds, but that's the people at the top, not the bottom.
Some sure, but for the most part no.
Most of them weren’t. And I’d consider moving a continent forward 100,000 years from mud huts to railroad and city takes all guilt away.
True to an extent. I’m anti science/technology in the sense that we should’ve stopped at the modern age (we are in the postmodern age so modern age would be 1890-1960) because a lot of modern science is nonsense and lies. You can have an industrialized, modern society and have it still be conservative I.e the nazis, but if it gets into post modern with computers and shit then it becomes difficult
Birth control has encouraged women to become gigasluts, but computers have allowed men to be 100% sure whether they are the dad, and can’t be cucked if they choose (paternity testing).True to an extent. I’m anti science/technology in the sense that we should’ve stopped at the modern age (we are in the postmodern age so modern age would be 1890-1960) because a lot of modern science is nonsense and lies. You can have an industrialized, modern society and have it still be conservative I.e the nazis, but if it gets into post modern with computers and shit then it becomes difficult
Do you believe Native Americans should have language rights as well as sovereignty and the right to self-determination?My country was the testing ground for British colonialism and the country is beyond repair 400 years later so I naturally would take the native American side on things.
The British claim that they civilised Ireland but Ireland would have developed into a "civilised" country anyway. The Gaelic Brehon laws were some of the most sophisticated in Europe and the Irish were well known in Europe for their scholars and poets. Just look at how the Irish earls fled to Spain and Rome after the Battle of Kinsale, they had strong connections with Catholic Europe in those days and the English paint them as barbarians on the edge of the world.