I dont mean to racebait, but

[blackpillednigga]

what are SFcels reaction to learning that whites have the most neanderthal DNA and blacks have the least? not trying to ragebait Im genuinely curious

 

[NIGGER BOJANGLES]

 

[SwiftQuill]

Couldn't care less.

Good for you I suppose?

 

[Castaway]

Wrong. East Asians have the most Neanderthal DNA. There’s nothing even wrong with having Neanderthal DNA.

 

[Sir Waco]

im not from san francisco but honestly idgaf, neanderthals just lived their own lives and took care of eachother

 

[Fluoxymesterone]

Either gonna be a thread with 6 replies or we will witness another epic battle

 

[DarkStar]

Why is this an issue?

Unless, you are trying to imply that having it is bad, which is what mainstream Woke afrocentrists do.

The "out of Africa" theory & model has been debunked many times


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIIXmmTjeYY

Europe's Ancestors: Cro-Magnon 28,000 Years Old Had DNA Like Modern Humans

Some 40,000 years ago, Cro-Magnons -- the first people who had a skeleton that looked anatomically modern -- entered Europe, coming from Africa. Geneticists now show that a Cro-Magnoid individual who lived in Southern Italy 28,000 years ago was a modern European, genetically as well as...

www.sciencedaily.com

 

[La Grande *Infamie*]

Hmm. Reads like Jewish science. Where’d you get this info from?

 

[blackpillednigga]

Why is this an issue?

Unless, you are trying to imply that having it is bad, which is what mainstream Woke afrocentrists do.

I thought you all frequently compared blacks to pre-evolved humans like homo erectus as proof they're inferior so I just wanted to hear your thoughts

 

[DarkStar]

I thought you all frequently compared blacks to pre-evolved humans like homo erectus as proof they're inferior so I just wanted to hear your thoughts

And how do neanderthals have anything to do? They were different species

 

[Uncle Death]

Wrong. East Asians have the most Neanderthal DNA. There’s nothing even wrong with having Neanderthal DNA.

You simp for asian too much… what gives?
People that worshipped east asian culture are usually soyboy cuck tbh, just superficial interest towards the oriental, when they despise you to the depth of your bone. Even more so than Negro, don’t you know Japanese rape Australian woman during ww2? Could be your mother lol

 

[Uncle Death]

Ik why White love Japanese anyways, they are like good little dogs. Autist love them more, for some reason. It’s really interesting and pathetic, when Asian try to be either as white as possible or as delusional about their own self.

 

[blackpillednigga]

Ik why White love Japanese anyways, they are like good little dogs. Autist love them more, for some reason. It’s really interesting and pathetic, when Asian try to be either as white as possible or as delusional about their own self.

its a combination of anime, rices being weak/submissive, and the assumption that rices are somehow racist even though they're ethnicists and dont discrminate based on race. I used to be like that when I was a weeb but I realized japs and the rest of east asians have nothing going for them as they're submissive to whites and have no spine. even their intelligence is more based on bland knowledge rather than creativity

 

[DarkStar]

even their intelligence is more based on bland knowledge rather than creativity

And so you agree that IQ does relate to race

 

[Koomersarj]

Not an SFcel but most human populations have some sort of archaic hominid (non-human) admixture. Europeans have Neanderthal, East Eurasians have Neanderthal + erectus, curries and Australo-Melanesians have Denisovan, West Africans have ghost ancestor DNA.

West African blacks actually have the most archaic hominid DNA at up to 19% ghost admixture. Europeans by comparison average 2% Neanderthal

 

[blackpillednigga]

And so you agree that IQ does relate to race

not really. I dont agree with your view about convergent vs divergent thinking. it's just that they're TAUGHT to learn things a certain way

 

[DarkStar]

not really. I dont agree with your view about convergent vs divergent thinking. it's just that they're TAUGHT to learn things a certain way

So how can you deny genetics determine intelligence?

 

[Koomersarj]

it's just that they're TAUGHT to learn things a certain way

If a behavior is conditioned into a population for generations it becomes selected for eventually

 

[justuseless]

Who gives a fuck

 

[DarkStar]

Who gives a fuck

JoinedDec 22, 2024

 

[blackpillednigga]

So how can you deny genetics determine intelligence?

it does but not to the extent that you think it does. you're underestimating how much influence culture plays as well and it's not a byproduct of race but the environment. africans became african-americans after living in USA for hundreds of years. their culture is completely unrelated to africans

 

[fullofchagrin]

what are SFcels reaction to learning that whites have the most neanderthal DNA and blacks have the least? not trying to ragebait Im genuinely curious

i mean doesn't that mean that neanderthal genes are a good thing?

 

[DarkStar]

i mean doesn't that mean that neanderthal genes are a good thing?

Idk what his premise was here considering this is his base for the argument:

I thought you all frequently compared blacks to pre-evolved humans like homo erectus as proof they're inferior so I just wanted to hear your thoughts

 

[DarkStar]

If a behavior is conditioned into a population for generations it becomes selected for eventually

Correct.

not really. I dont agree with your view about convergent vs divergent thinking.

Here's some stuff:

Here, we demonstrate for the first time a robust association between cultural values of individualism–collectivism and allelic frequency of the serotonin transporter gene, controlling for associated economic and disease factors. Geographical regions characterized by cultural collectivism exhibit a greater prevalence of S allele carriers of the serotonin transporter gene, even when cultural regions rather than nations served as the unit of analysis. Additionally, we show that global variability in historical pathogen prevalence predicts global variability in individualism–collectivism owing to genetic selection of the S allele of the serotonin transporter gene in regions characterized by high collectivism. Importantly, we also reveal a novel and surprising negative association between individualism–collectivism, frequency of S allele carriers of the serotonin transporter gene and global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorder. Across nations, both collectivism and allelic frequency of the S allele negatively predict global prevalence of anxiety and mood disorders. Critically, our results further indicate that greater population frequency of S allele carriers is associated with decreased prevalence of anxiety and mood disorders due to increased cultural collectivism.

https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspb.2009.1650

The current findings suggest a novel demonstration of culture–gene coevolution of human behaviour. Emphasizing social norms that increase social harmony and encourage giving social support to others, collectivism serves an ‘anti-psychopathology’ function by creating an ecological niche that lowers the prevalence of chronic life stress, protecting genetically susceptible individuals from environmental pathogens known to trigger negative emotion and psychopathology. These findings complement notions that cultural values of individualism and collectivism are adaptive and by-products of evolution, more broadly.

View: https://andreashofer72.medium.com/the-evolutionary-psychology-of-human-creativity-a1d7b3d2643d

In this scheme, nomadic subsistence strategies would require more creativity than sedentary ones, which would require more long-term planning but otherwise relatively little creativity. In fact, there seem to be various genetic differences between nomadic and sedentary people:

We know of a gene that may play a part in this story: the 7R (for 7-repeat) allele of the DRD4 (dopamine receptor D4) gene. It is associated with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD), a behavioral syndrome best characterized by actions that annoy elementary school teachers: restless-impulsive behavior, inattention, distractibility, and the like.

The polymorphism is found at varying but significant levels in many parts of the world, but is almost totally absent from East Asia. Interestingly, alleles derived from the 7R allele are fairly common in China, even though the 7R alleles themselves are extremely rare there. It is possible that individuals bearing these alleles were selected against because of cultural patterns in China. The Japanese say that the nail that sticks out is hammered down, but in China it may have been pulled out and thrown away.

ADHD is associated with a higher level of creativity. Conformism and obedience to authority that are associated with those farming cultures are negatively correlated with creativity. In fact, it seems that agricultural societies select against creative personalities! East Asian cultures are renowned for their high productivity and work ethos, much less so for their creativity. China, like most agricultural societies, was once a hotbed of innovation. Considering its huge population, China’s contribution to innovation seems mediocre at best. China is much better at copying Western innovations than coming up with its own.

Basically, a certain gene is much less prevalent there, combined with the fact they've always had collectivist cultures

it does but not to the extent that you think it does.

I'd say I'm fairly balanced, I think IQ & behavior is 50% heritable 50% environment.

you're underestimating how much influence culture plays as well

As another user in another thread put it, culture is a byproduct of genes manifesting themselves within various social interactions, which takes various forms. If you read above, it does kinda elaborate & explain upon it.

and it's not a byproduct of race but the environment.

Never denied environment doesn't matter, but the point is it's disingenuous to somehow neglect that genes play a role, and ofc certain genes will have overtime been selected for in certain races.

africans became african-americans after living in USA for hundreds of years. their culture is completely unrelated to africans

-They were here before the US was established, whole generations were born, raised, and died before the "US" even existed. In fact, most went to LatAm and eventually interbred, which gives us the modern day population of Brazil, Venezuela, etc. So it wasn't the US or the culture in it, rather that of just being literally part of the "New World" identity in a way, but that's something I can go on about & make a whole essay-tier thread on(basically, the New World & the US is supposed to be this "New Rome" but everyones a mutt)
-They arrived here due to other tribes conquering & selling other tribes out:

Little is known of slavery in the Kingdom of Kongo before contact with the Portuguese in 1482[xxviii]. A number of sources state that there was an established tradition of making slaves out of people displaced by conquest in the early 1400s[xxix]. This is potentially explained by the fact that the export of slaves was central to the ability of Kongo to maintain its relationship with Portugal[xxx], which meant that Kongo needed to have a constant supply of slaves. The usage of slaves would, during this early period of slave trade, become more common within the Kingdom as well[xxxi] , although the export of slaves to Europe and the Americas would later be the cause of much instability and strife in the Kingdom.

Little is known of slavery in the Kingdom of Kongo before contact with the Portuguese in 1482[xxviii]. A number of sources state that there was an established tradition of making slaves out of people displaced by conquest in the early 1400s[xxix]. This is potentially explained by the fact that the export of slaves was central to the ability of Kongo to maintain its relationship with Portugal[xxx], which meant that Kongo needed to have a constant supply of slaves. The usage of slaves would, during this early period of slave trade, become more common within the Kingdom as well[xxxi] , although the export of slaves to Europe and the Americas would later be the cause of much instability and strife in the Kingdom.

Slaves became the tool through which Kongo developed and sustained their material, cultural and diplomatic ties with the European powers[xlvi]. Kongolese nobles could buy slaves with the local currency, nzimbu shells, and the slaves could in turn be traded for international currency.

Kingdom of Kongo 1390–1914 | South African History Online

www.sahistory.org.za

In a way, this somewhat kinda mirrors the way a lot of African countries still are nowadays & many Black communities in the US where gangs run the scene.


There's this also:

MAOA-3R — the “original warrior gene” — was the first gene linked with antisocial characteristics. But Maori were not the only ethnic group with a high frequency of this variant. It turned out that while 3R was found in 56% of Maori males, it occurred in 58% of African American males and 34% of European males [2]. Misinterpreted by the media, the 3R variant quickly became a lead character in a pop science narrative intended to explain why certain racial groups appear to have increased tendencies toward violence. When a disproportionately high number of males of an ethnic group carries a less common gene linked with aggressive behaviors, the discussion about that gene immediately takes on racial overtones [3, 14]. (Interestingly, the press ignored studies indicating that the 3R variant occurred in 61% of Taiwanese males [15] and 56% of Chinese males [16]).

The Extreme Warrior gene: a reality check

by Alondra Oubré MAOA — Genetic culprit for violence? Theories about inborn race-based aggression, violence, and criminality are back in the news [1]. In the ongoing search for genes underlying soc…

scientiasalon.wordpress.com

Variation in the human monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) gene can influence neurotransmittor levels and is thought to have a role in many behavioral traits. The genetic architecture of MAO-A is known to vary across different geographic subgroups. Previous studies have reported evidence for positive selection within the MAO-A gene region in seven ethnic groups: Pygmy, Aboriginal Taiwanese, Chinese, Japanese, Mexican and Russian

A unique demographic history exists for the MAO-A gene in Polynesians - Journal of Human Genetics

Variation in the human monoamine oxidase A (MAO-A) gene can influence neurotransmittor levels and is thought to have a role in many behavioral traits. The genetic architecture of MAO-A is known to vary across different geographic subgroups. Previous studies have reported evidence for positive...

www.nature.com

 

[fullofchagrin]

Idk what his premise was here considering this is his base for the argument:

it's not even true that white people have the most neanderthal genes. the percentage of neanderthal genes is pretty much the same across all human races, except blacks who don't have any.