Reddit's r/Mensrights copypasta:
1. 6' implies the 82th percentil, that is, in a Gaussian distribution, only 18% of men in the United States that reach that height, from a population of 165 million of men, Which is equivalent to 29.7 million men.
2. Taking into account that it is more optimistically estimated that only 14% earn more than 6 figures in the United States, and assuming that the number of women can reduce this statistic at the same time that there is a certain accumulation of capital in this population group in a population of men aged 50 and over. If we disregard these variables, and we only assume the US male population, we will have that 14% of men implies 23.1 million men.
3. The 6 inches in the genitals follow the same Gaussian distribution. If the Gauss curve establishes its 50th percentile at 5.6'' in the United States, so a 6 inch penis will have an incidence of 32.8% of men (~62nd percentile), so we have a total of 54 million men with these dimensions or longer.
Since we have the probability that each of these individual events will occur, the correlation of the three events is given through the multiplication of the three variables. So, the probability that events 1, 2, and 3 all occur is:
0.18 x 0.14 x 0.328 = 0.0081672
Multiplying this by the population size of 165 million gives the number of people expected to experience all three events:
0.0081672 x 165,000,000 ≈ 1,348,548, which is equivalent to 0.87% of the US male population whom meet this ideal of the triple 6
These standards beyond their legitimacy are not that they are sensible, but that they are, merged, probabilistically ridiculous in a population of heterosexual women of hundreds of millions.
And these are high calculations, adding more variables and with more specific data, the number of men who meet the triple 6 ideal would be drastically reduced.
1. 6' implies the 82th percentil, that is, in a Gaussian distribution, only 18% of men in the United States that reach that height, from a population of 165 million of men, Which is equivalent to 29.7 million men.
2. Taking into account that it is more optimistically estimated that only 14% earn more than 6 figures in the United States, and assuming that the number of women can reduce this statistic at the same time that there is a certain accumulation of capital in this population group in a population of men aged 50 and over. If we disregard these variables, and we only assume the US male population, we will have that 14% of men implies 23.1 million men.
3. The 6 inches in the genitals follow the same Gaussian distribution. If the Gauss curve establishes its 50th percentile at 5.6'' in the United States, so a 6 inch penis will have an incidence of 32.8% of men (~62nd percentile), so we have a total of 54 million men with these dimensions or longer.
Since we have the probability that each of these individual events will occur, the correlation of the three events is given through the multiplication of the three variables. So, the probability that events 1, 2, and 3 all occur is:
0.18 x 0.14 x 0.328 = 0.0081672
Multiplying this by the population size of 165 million gives the number of people expected to experience all three events:
0.0081672 x 165,000,000 ≈ 1,348,548, which is equivalent to 0.87% of the US male population whom meet this ideal of the triple 6
These standards beyond their legitimacy are not that they are sensible, but that they are, merged, probabilistically ridiculous in a population of heterosexual women of hundreds of millions.
And these are high calculations, adding more variables and with more specific data, the number of men who meet the triple 6 ideal would be drastically reduced.
No penis stats, sadly.
You could program a calculator with the Scientific Blackpill article on the wiki, but the ideal percentage is probably infinitesimal.
Over for 99%cels.
Only a foid could have such ridiculous standards with no shame about it. Fucking retarded narcissists.
Over 4 Betabuxxers
most of them will settle for an average income guy
Time to invest in the lottery
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
