Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Serious I Don't Get "Right-Wing"cels (my response)

WeirdPanda

WeirdPanda

Self-banned
-
Joined
Sep 5, 2024
Posts
4,801
1) As per what I have stated many times, I understand being left-wing on the economic axis ofc & do agree with certain economically left views- it makes sense from various perspectives including when factoring in Socio-Cultural axis values

Socio-Cultural axis values are deprecated nonsense that originated from the spawns of the 2-axis political spectrum and the political compass. Both of which are incredibly retarded ways to understand politics. I can't believe it's 2025 and right-wingers still latch onto this nonsense. There's no such thing as authoritarian leftism as the end goal of all socialist ideologies is a stateless, classless society. And being economically left is often used to refer to non-left economic policies such as corporatism, which is better known as class collaborationism that consists of (atleast in fascist ideology) the classes working together towards the common goal of the nation.

2) But I just cannot understand those who are "socially left" I mean just what? To me, it's as if these people have lost the ball.

There's no such thing as socially left, it's just left. Most of the leftists you see in the modern left are barely even leftist. Leftists are still a rarity and lack representation. Even on reddit most of the SJWs you see take the influence of neoconservatism, neoliberalism or just populist politics. I'd go as far as saying that's being generous.

3) Who are the same people who argue for "egalitarianism" and push all those notions?

People who are of the working class/non-bourgeoisie and have most likely reached the conclusion of their lack of privilege/their own place in society. Anything other than is either richfags or copers. I've already made it clear that I think most people who are not in support of egalitarianism do so for the satisfaction on wanting revenge and being on the dominant side of the coin. Tell me, how does that not start another cycle? Because even so if things happened as you say, you'd just become a new elite and most of the knowledge that exists in here would be twisted to our side. And obviously then a new blackpill would form.

4) How can you deny the existence & reality of race?

I believe race is a social construct, but I also believe that certain living conditions and upbringings associated with different races and cultures can influence your way of thinking/thought-process. I myself am a mulatto, but I grew-up in a rather "not mutt" ambient with christian parents and lack of interaction with other people and kids. Instead, I spent my time on the computer and interacted with other foreigners in online videogames and even taught myself english from a very young age. Such is likely the reason my IQ leans toward the higher side than the average of the country. This is proof that your IQ is mostly shaped by the ambient and upbringing you were raised in and NOT by race or anything you race realists have come up with. It's delusion, and none of your cope research can explain my case and many others. Not only that but I've seen even higher IQ ethnics than me in real life who most likely had an even better education than some of you.

5) Why does everything have to be chalked up to colonialism, this is always funny since they claim to not be racist but then are lowkey racist towards Europeans/Whites

Because it is. Colonialism explains a lot of the problems in the world. The problem of third-world countries that you see and you guys poking fun at it all while your ancestors were the ones responsible for creating this mess? This is just laughable.

6) But yeah, just my spiel- don't get these people & frankly I wish I didn't have to share this "community" with them

I guess I can't change your mind on this one. I see a lot of people agree with you too. I'm just gonna utilize this last paragraph to say that I'm not a fucking feminist. If anything, I'm advocating for men to NOT be put to such a high standard compared to women. Men and women should be put at the same fucking standard, pronto. That's the only way I know I won't get tormented due to my lack of gendered competencies. Women are entirely attracted to gendered competencies historically and in right-wing societies, and most of the stuff you put out here is just lashing out against it in an empty attempt to change the world while it does NOTHING at all. Why do you think I associate extreme right-wing ideology with mere revenge fantasy then? You guys don't want to change the world, you just want to be the ones to enjoy being the powerful ones. I do not bother to give some of that even the virtue of doubt, it does not have moral consistency.

So yeah, whatever! Whatever!

@DarkStar
 
mj-popcorn.gif | Vevmo
 
You become right wing when you can't have a tight wing butt fuck with slutty whore class nymph
 
I believe race is a social construct, but I also believe that certain living conditions and upbringings associated with different races and cultures can influence your way of thinking/thought-process. I myself am a mulatto, but I grew-up in a rather "not mutt" ambient with christian parents and lack of interaction with other people and kids. Instead, I spent my time on the computer and interacted with other foreigners in online videogames and even taught myself english from a very young age. Such is likely the reason my IQ leans toward the higher side than the average of the country. This is proof that your IQ is mostly shaped by the ambient and upbringing you were raised in and NOT by race or anything you race realists have come up with. It's delusion, and none of your cope research can explain my case and many others. Not only that but I've seen even higher IQ ethnics than me in real life who most likely had an even better education than some of you.
Nice job proving you’re even more of a brainrotted Redditor moron than I thought you were.

Exceptions do not disprove general patterns. IQ is 40-60% genetic (proven by study after study), populations which are geographically close and phenotypically similar cluster with one another genetically (again, proven by study after study), and we observe statistically significant IQ gaps between races on average. Temperament is also roughly 50% genetic – might explain why rich blacks in America are 3-4x more likely to get incarcerated than the poorest whites:
^ “muhhh racial profiling and overpolicing!” Again, this is a 3-4x difference in arrest rate between RICH blacks & POOR whites. Your excuses don’t apply here.
Colonialism explains a lot of the problems in the world. The problem of third-world countries that you see and you guys poking fun at it all while your ancestors were the ones responsible for creating this mess?
So why don’t you go ahead and explain to me why Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia were shitholes long before colonization?

Medieval North African scholar Ibn Khaldun on black Africans:
1747826799105

1747826816724


“B-b-b-but muh Kush! Muh Axum!” – Horn Africans are not pure blacks. They possess a lot of West Eurasian admixture.

Babur, Mughal conqueror of North India, on the people of early modern curryland:
1747826944345


Feel free to search for more accounts by the Arabs & Turks of pre-colonial Africa and India. You won’t like what they say. Nothing ever happens? Nah, nigga; more like nothing ever changes :lul:
 
Nice job proving you’re even more of a brainrotted Redditor moron than I thought you were.

Exceptions do not disprove general patterns. IQ is 40-60% genetic (proven by study after study), populations which are geographically close and phenotypically similar cluster with one another genetically (again, proven by study after study), and we observe statistically significant IQ gaps between races on average. Temperament is also roughly 50% genetic – might explain why rich blacks in America are 3-4x more likely to get incarcerated than the poorest whites:
^ “muhhh racial profiling and overpolicing!” Again, this is a 3-4x difference in arrest rate between RICH blacks & POOR whites. Your excuses don’t apply here.

So why don’t you go ahead and explain to me why Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia were shitholes long before colonization?

Medieval North African scholar Ibn Khaldun on black Africans:
View attachment 1451429
View attachment 1451430

“B-b-b-but muh Kush! Muh Axum!” – Horn Africans are not pure blacks. They possess a lot of West Eurasian admixture.

Babur, Mughal conqueror of North India, on the people of early modern curryland:
View attachment 1451433

Feel free to search for more accounts by the Arabs & Turks of pre-colonial Africa and India. You won’t like what they say. Nothing ever happens? Nah, nigga; more like nothing ever changes :lul:
I knew you were gonna come up with that exception bullshit! :lul:

JFL you retards always do that. There's no empirical evidence for your bullshit! Anyways let me read.
 
Nice job proving you’re even more of a brainrotted Redditor moron than I thought you were.

Exceptions do not disprove general patterns. IQ is 40-60% genetic (proven by study after study), populations which are geographically close and phenotypically similar cluster with one another genetically (again, proven by study after study), and we observe statistically significant IQ gaps between races on average. Temperament is also roughly 50% genetic – might explain why rich blacks in America are 3-4x more likely to get incarcerated than the poorest whites:
^ “muhhh racial profiling and overpolicing!” Again, this is a 3-4x difference in arrest rate between RICH blacks & POOR whites. Your excuses don’t apply here.

So why don’t you go ahead and explain to me why Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia were shitholes long before colonization?

Medieval North African scholar Ibn Khaldun on black Africans:
View attachment 1451429
View attachment 1451430

“B-b-b-but muh Kush! Muh Axum!” – Horn Africans are not pure blacks. They possess a lot of West Eurasian admixture.

Babur, Mughal conqueror of North India, on the people of early modern curryland:
View attachment 1451433

Feel free to search for more accounts by the Arabs & Turks of pre-colonial Africa and India. You won’t like what they say. Nothing ever happens? Nah, nigga; more like nothing ever changes :lul:
It's amazing how even after reading that you managed to misunderstand my point completely. All of that shit you showed me is biased theoretical research that has absolutely NO FUCKING VALUE in real life. You people live in an intellectual bubble with NO PRACTICAL FOUNDATION! Get that through your thick skull, homo-sapiens.

All of this is explained by my views on cultural upbringing.

Also these regions being shitholes is explained by lack of resources. The old europeans only managed to progress with the help of a few geniuses. The IQ differences are not as big as you'd like to think it is.
 
I knew you were gonna come up with that exception bullshit! :lul:

JFL you retards always do that. There's no empirical evidence for your bullshit! Anyways let me read.
So true, no empirical evidence whatsoever. Just study after study showing an average IQ gap between blacks & whites (of around 1 standard deviation, no less) and study after study showing that IQ is highly heritable
 
So true, no empirical evidence whatsoever. Just study after study showing an average IQ gap between blacks & whites (of around 1 standard deviation, no less) and study after study showing that IQ is highly heritable
It is biased from a classist point of view. JFL that's what I mean by no empirical evidence. What I mean is that you people always use the "exception" keyword to justify faults in your conclusions.
 
1) As per what I have stated many times, I understand being left-wing on the economic axis ofc & do agree with certain economically left views- it makes sense from various perspectives including when factoring in Socio-Cultural axis values

Socio-Cultural axis values are deprecated nonsense that originated from the spawns of the 2-axis political spectrum and the political compass. Both of which are incredibly retarded ways to understand politics. I can't believe it's 2025 and right-wingers still latch onto this nonsense. There's no such thing as authoritarian leftism as the end goal of all socialist ideologies is a stateless, classless society. And being economically left is often used to refer to non-left economic policies such as corporatism, which is better known as class collaborationism that consists of (atleast in fascist ideology) the classes working together towards the common goal of the nation.

2) But I just cannot understand those who are "socially left" I mean just what? To me, it's as if these people have lost the ball.

There's no such thing as socially left, it's just left. Most of the leftists you see in the modern left are barely even leftist. Leftists are still a rarity and lack representation. Even on reddit most of the SJWs you see take the influence of neoconservatism, neoliberalism or just populist politics. I'd go as far as saying that's being generous.

3) Who are the same people who argue for "egalitarianism" and push all those notions?

People who are of the working class/non-bourgeoisie and have most likely reached the conclusion of their lack of privilege/their own place in society. Anything other than is either richfags or copers. I've already made it clear that I think most people who are not in support of egalitarianism do so for the satisfaction on wanting revenge and being on the dominant side of the coin. Tell me, how does that not start another cycle? Because even so if things happened as you say, you'd just become a new elite and most of the knowledge that exists in here would be twisted to our side. And obviously then a new blackpill would form.

4) How can you deny the existence & reality of race?

I believe race is a social construct, but I also believe that certain living conditions and upbringings associated with different races and cultures can influence your way of thinking/thought-process. I myself am a mulatto, but I grew-up in a rather "not mutt" ambient with christian parents and lack of interaction with other people and kids. Instead, I spent my time on the computer and interacted with other foreigners in online videogames and even taught myself english from a very young age. Such is likely the reason my IQ leans toward the higher side than the average of the country. This is proof that your IQ is mostly shaped by the ambient and upbringing you were raised in and NOT by race or anything you race realists have come up with. It's delusion, and none of your cope research can explain my case and many others. Not only that but I've seen even higher IQ ethnics than me in real life who most likely had an even better education than some of you.

5) Why does everything have to be chalked up to colonialism, this is always funny since they claim to not be racist but then are lowkey racist towards Europeans/Whites

Because it is. Colonialism explains a lot of the problems in the world. The problem of third-world countries that you see and you guys poking fun at it all while your ancestors were the ones responsible for creating this mess? This is just laughable.

6) But yeah, just my spiel- don't get these people & frankly I wish I didn't have to share this "community" with them

I guess I can't change your mind on this one. I see a lot of people agree with you too. I'm just gonna utilize this last paragraph to say that I'm not a fucking feminist. If anything, I'm advocating for men to NOT be put to such a high standard compared to women. Men and women should be put at the same fucking standard, pronto. That's the only way I know I won't get tormented due to my lack of gendered competencies. Women are entirely attracted to gendered competencies historically and in right-wing societies, and most of the stuff you put out here is just lashing out against it in an empty attempt to change the world while it does NOTHING at all. Why do you think I associate extreme right-wing ideology with mere revenge fantasy then? You guys don't want to change the world, you just want to be the ones to enjoy being the powerful ones. I do not bother to give some of that even the virtue of doubt, it does not have moral consistency.

So yeah, whatever! Whatever!

@DarkStar
Fuck that woke shit
 
1) As per what I have stated many times, I understand being left-wing on the economic axis ofc & do agree with certain economically left views- it makes sense from various perspectives including when factoring in Socio-Cultural axis values

Socio-Cultural axis values are deprecated nonsense that originated from the spawns of the 2-axis political spectrum and the political compass. Both of which are incredibly retarded ways to understand politics. I can't believe it's 2025 and right-wingers still latch onto this nonsense. There's no such thing as authoritarian leftism as the end goal of all socialist ideologies is a stateless, classless society. And being economically left is often used to refer to non-left economic policies such as corporatism, which is better known as class collaborationism that consists of (atleast in fascist ideology) the classes working together towards the common goal of the nation.

2) But I just cannot understand those who are "socially left" I mean just what? To me, it's as if these people have lost the ball.

There's no such thing as socially left, it's just left. Most of the leftists you see in the modern left are barely even leftist. Leftists are still a rarity and lack representation. Even on reddit most of the SJWs you see take the influence of neoconservatism, neoliberalism or just populist politics. I'd go as far as saying that's being generous.

3) Who are the same people who argue for "egalitarianism" and push all those notions?

People who are of the working class/non-bourgeoisie and have most likely reached the conclusion of their lack of privilege/their own place in society. Anything other than is either richfags or copers. I've already made it clear that I think most people who are not in support of egalitarianism do so for the satisfaction on wanting revenge and being on the dominant side of the coin. Tell me, how does that not start another cycle? Because even so if things happened as you say, you'd just become a new elite and most of the knowledge that exists in here would be twisted to our side. And obviously then a new blackpill would form.

4) How can you deny the existence & reality of race?

I believe race is a social construct, but I also believe that certain living conditions and upbringings associated with different races and cultures can influence your way of thinking/thought-process. I myself am a mulatto, but I grew-up in a rather "not mutt" ambient with christian parents and lack of interaction with other people and kids. Instead, I spent my time on the computer and interacted with other foreigners in online videogames and even taught myself english from a very young age. Such is likely the reason my IQ leans toward the higher side than the average of the country. This is proof that your IQ is mostly shaped by the ambient and upbringing you were raised in and NOT by race or anything you race realists have come up with. It's delusion, and none of your cope research can explain my case and many others. Not only that but I've seen even higher IQ ethnics than me in real life who most likely had an even better education than some of you.

5) Why does everything have to be chalked up to colonialism, this is always funny since they claim to not be racist but then are lowkey racist towards Europeans/Whites

Because it is. Colonialism explains a lot of the problems in the world. The problem of third-world countries that you see and you guys poking fun at it all while your ancestors were the ones responsible for creating this mess? This is just laughable.

6) But yeah, just my spiel- don't get these people & frankly I wish I didn't have to share this "community" with them

I guess I can't change your mind on this one. I see a lot of people agree with you too. I'm just gonna utilize this last paragraph to say that I'm not a fucking feminist. If anything, I'm advocating for men to NOT be put to such a high standard compared to women. Men and women should be put at the same fucking standard, pronto. That's the only way I know I won't get tormented due to my lack of gendered competencies. Women are entirely attracted to gendered competencies historically and in right-wing societies, and most of the stuff you put out here is just lashing out against it in an empty attempt to change the world while it does NOTHING at all. Why do you think I associate extreme right-wing ideology with mere revenge fantasy then? You guys don't want to change the world, you just want to be the ones to enjoy being the powerful ones. I do not bother to give some of that even the virtue of doubt, it does not have moral consistency.

So yeah, whatever! Whatever!

@DarkStar
You sound like a redditor faggot saying "social construct",biological races are real.
 
You sound like a redditor faggot saying "social construct",biological races are real.
How the fuck am I going to believe in deterministic race realist concepts if my whole existence is nothing short of an "exception" in your opinions?

I'm quite literally half nig.
 
How the fuck am I going to believe in deterministic race realist concepts if my whole existence is nothing short of an "exception" in your opinions?

I'm quite literally half nig.
You are a mestizo, what are you trying to tell me?
 
I don't debate with cultural marxists, that thing has more of religion than ideology.
Cultural-marxism is a right-wing boogeyman. The "woke left" has its own boogeymans as well (even though I'm not part of the woke left) but you're really reaching if you don't admit that cultural marxism is a boogeyman.
 
Cultural-marxism is a right-wing boogeyman. The "woke left" has its own boogeymans as well (even though I'm not part of the woke left) but you're really reaching if you don't admit that cultural marxism is a boogeyman.
Cultural marxism exists and it's just marxist theories in social values instead of economy.
 
biased theoretical research
You mean that link from the Equal Justice Initiative?? That’s literally from your own soyfag side of the fence, dear ball-fondler.
It is biased from a classist point of view. JFL that's what I mean by no empirical evidence. What I mean is that you people always use the "exception" keyword to justify faults in your conclusions.
What part of “IQ being 40-60% heritable” do you not understand? And the question of how much socioeconomic factors, unless truly debilitating, affect IQ remains unanswered. Take this study, for instance, which shows high levels of heritability for IQ across social classes:

I also provided you with the study suggesting affluent blacks commit more crime than poor whites (evidenced by the 3-4x incarceration rate disparity between the two groups). Obviously, criminality doesn’t necessarily indicate low IQ, but there’s an inverse correlation between criminality and IQ.
Also these regions being shitholes is explained by lack of resources.
“We iz poor cuz whitey kahlunyzed us n took owa REEsourcez!!”

“We waz poor befo whitey came kuz of owa LACK of REEsourcez!!”

Holy shit dude, make up your mind :feelskek: Sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian subcontinent were NOT lacking in resources. Hence the decision to colonize them in the first place. The natives simply sat on the resources and did nothing with them. It was a lack of ability to come up with good ideas that made SSA and curryland poor. So in a sense you’re right, there was a lack of resources – cognitive resources.
The old europeans only managed to progress with the help of a few geniuses.
Yes, it was a relatively small number of very intelligent people who pushed Western civilization (and civilization in general) forward. But you’re going to have a higher frequency of such geniuses when the general IQ distribution is higher.
What I mean is that you people always use the "exception" keyword to justify faults in your conclusions.
I’m not and never was speaking in an absolute sense. Yes, there’s more IQ variation within races than between the average scores of races. That still doesn’t change the fact that those differences in race averages exist, or that IQ is proven to be highly heritable
 
Last edited:
You mean that link from the Equal Justice Initiative?? That’s literally from your own soyfag side of the fence, dear ball-fondler.
That's beside the point, even if the research isn't biased then you're still using it for your biased purposes is what I meant.

What part of “IQ being 40-60% heritable” do you not understand? And the question of how much socioeconomic factors, unless truly debilitating, affect IQ remains unanswered. Take this study, for instance, which shows high levels of heritability for IQ across social classes:
I quite literally did not inherit my IQ from my parents. Nor my ancestors. Absolutely the fuck not. :feelskek:

I also provided you with the study suggesting affluent blacks commit more crime than poor whites (evidenced by the 3-4x incarceration rate disparity between the two groups). Obviously, criminality doesn’t necessarily indicate low IQ, but there’s an inverse correlation between criminality and IQ.
Like I said, cultural upbringing. And I guess I saw something about the amygdalas in black people being different which I guess could be correlated, but that's still not related to IQ and more to neuroticism, impulsivity and the like.

Holy shit dude, make up your mind :feelskek: Sub-Saharan Africa and the Indian subcontinent were NOT lacking in resources. Hence the decision to colonize them in the first place. The natives simply sat on the resources and did nothing with them. It was a lack of ability to come up with good ideas that made SSA and curryland poor. So in a sense you’re right, there was a lack of resources – cognitive resources.
Higher temperatures/dry regions could be a factor for the lack of innovation. As well as cultural focuses, it simply means that they did not need to adapt unlike europeans who lived in harsher conditions. It's not about cognitive resources, once again. Also, I didn't say there were no differences, but IQ nowadays is largely to do with upbringing and education than cognitive superiority overall.

Yes, it was a relatively small number of very intelligent people who pushed Western civilization (and civilization in general) forward. But you’re going to have a higher frequency of such geniuses when the general IQ distribution is higher.
I guess.

I’m not and never was speaking in an absolute sense. Yes, there’s more IQ variation within races than between the average scores of races. That still doesn’t change the fact that those differences in race averages exist, or that IQ is proven to be highly heritable
You say it yourself. There is more IQ variation within races than between them. And obviously I still believe most of these patterns you find are to do with cultural upbringing rather than being in their nature.
 
There's no such thing as authoritarian leftism as the end goal of all socialist ideologies is a stateless, classless society.
....which is impossible. Come back when you are ready to face the facts of the world as it is, not saturated by your delulu man-made notions of "equality" or "justice" or whatever. People are NOT born equal (I would refer to @Koomersarj's posts above) and every single real-life political system is bound to reflect that.


There's no such thing as socially left, it's just left. Most of the leftists you see in the modern left are barely even leftist. Leftists are still a rarity and lack representation. Even on reddit most of the SJWs you see take the influence of neoconservatism, neoliberalism or just populist politics. I'd go as far as saying that's being generous.
ah yes, the claim that you are the true representative of leftists and not the literal majority of people who are leftist. I find this akin to the "mUh tRuE cOmmUniSM hAsN't bEeN aPpliED" argument commies use to attenuate literally any criticism. No retard, your Left is not "tRuE lEfT". An ideology is defined by the actual impact of its practitioners, not some airy ideal it seeks to aim at in some looney tunes alternative history.


People who are of the working class/non-bourgeoisie and have most likely reached the conclusion of their lack of privilege/their own place in society. Anything other than is either richfags or copers. I've already made it clear that I think most people who are not in support of egalitarianism do so for the satisfaction on wanting revenge and being on the dominant side of the coin. Tell me, how does that not start another cycle? Because even so if things happened as you say, you'd just become a new elite and most of the knowledge that exists in here would be twisted to our side. And obviously then a new blackpill would form.
you do realize that most RWs here are against richfags right? Also "egalitarianism" looks nice in principle but it is simply not feasible. Western liberal democracy is supposed to embody an egalitarian society and yet it needs not be said how fucked-up things are in the West for people like incels.


I guess I can't change your mind on this one. I see a lot of people agree with you too. I'm just gonna utilize this last paragraph to say that I'm not a fucking feminist. If anything, I'm advocating for men to NOT be put to such a high standard compared to women. Men and women should be put at the same fucking standard, pronto. That's the only way I know I won't get tormented due to my lack of gendered competencies. Women are entirely attracted to gendered competencies historically and in right-wing societies, and most of the stuff you put out here is just lashing out against it in an empty attempt to change the world while it does NOTHING at all. Why do you think I associate extreme right-wing ideology with mere revenge fantasy then? You guys don't want to change the world, you just want to be the ones to enjoy being the powerful ones. I do not bother to give some of that even the virtue of doubt, it does not have moral consistency.
"muh males and females should be equalll" your monkey brain instincts would disagree. Men are physically stronger than women. Men also can't give birth, while women can. There is no equality between men and women. Anyone who disagrees is a delusional coper who lives in some fantasyland. Also JFL you literally admitted that you see RW as mere revenge fantasy :feelskek:

Also what is this faggotry about "muh changing the world"? Of course we want to be the powerful ones, dumb fuck. That's the entire point of existence. Life is a struggle for power. That is why we feel emotions like rage, envy and contempt. It is in our DNA to strive for power. Also fuck your "moral consistency". We literally eat animals for meat, there is no morality to it. The strong rule the weak. That is Law.

I do however agree with, to a certain extent, your views on race and colonialism.
 
Last edited:
That's beside the point, even if the research isn't biased then you're still using it for your biased purposes is what I meant.
What kind of retarded denial is this? You have no studies of your own to drive your point.
I quite literally did not inherit my IQ from my parents. Nor my ancestors. Absolutely the fuck not. :feelskek:
Ah yes, anecdotes. How relevant and insightful in a serious discussion about statistical trends.
Like I said, cultural upbringing. And I guess I saw something about the amygdalas in black people being different which I guess could be correlated, but that's still not related to IQ and more to neuroticism, impulsivity and the like.
Neuroticism is inversely correlated with intelligence. Funny how you literally proved his point.
Higher temperatures/dry regions could be a factor for the lack of innovation.
No shit dude. Climate shapes racial differences. I once read somewhere that Europeans exhibit higher adaptability and intelligence due to living in tough, cold environments for lengthy epochs of time. This might also explain why Ashkenazi Jews have one of the highest average IQs of all the ethnic groups [Lynn, R. (2011). The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement.]. They have been persecuted heavily all throughout history which certainly explains a lot. Adversity causes adaptation. Adaptation breeds intelligence.
 
Last edited:
No shit dude. Climate shapes racial differences. I once read somewhere that Europeans exhibit higher adaptability and intelligence due to living in tough, cold environments for lengthy epochs of time. This might also explain why Ashkenazi Jews have one of the highest average IQs of all the ethnic groups [Lynn, R. (2011). The Chosen People: A Study of Jewish Intelligence and Achievement.]. They have been persecuted heavily all throughout history which certainly explains a lot. Adversity causes adaptation. Adaptation breeds intelligence.
My point is that even though these differences in adaptation exist, there is nothing to support that for nowadays. And like I said, western civillization mostly advanced through the contributions of scholastics (which are few, with differing personalities than most).

These can be spotted in all races. But obviously racists would rather believe everything is hereditary when we are literally in the 21st century and the only reason we don't see many ethnics (although there are some, compared to the past when there were none notable for western/anglocentric society) making contributions of similar are due to class and cultural differences. Such as in my country Brazil, or India, or even Africa which has it worse than both of the previous countries.

As so, I believe that interculturalism will help get rid of these differences. But obviously, nationalists/racists/isolationists don't want any progress for humanity. They only want their retrogade thought to be implemented and envision themselves as the new elite.
 
Last edited:
What kind of retarded denial is this? You have no studies of your own to drive your point..
I do not wish to argue with studies, dumbass. If he has studies that proves parts of his points I'll take them into consideration and adjust my arguments to suit them. My arguments are based on personal experience and reflection, something that you guys don't seem to have much and as thus rely mostly on theoretics and the like.
 
anecdotes again. also exceptions do not disprove the rule. Basic common sense.



Not a proven statistic.
Deny it all you want. I can't convince you that most incels are neurotic, but since you're speaking common sense then this should be common sense as well.
 
I do not wish to argue with studies, dumbass.
JFL :lul:


My arguments are based on personal experience and reflection, something that you guys don't seem to have much and as thus rely mostly on theoretics and the like.
What use is anecdotal experience and vague "reflection" in an objective evaluation of a political ideology?
 
JFL :lul:



What use is anecdotal experience and vague "reflection" in an objective evaluation of a political ideology?
Politics/ideology/all the social shit are not a "hard" subject. They're soft sciences. There is plenty of space for subjective evaluation in it, doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong as subjective evaluations are also based on reality.
 
Deny it all you want. I can't convince you that most incels are neurotic, but since you're speaking common sense then this should be common sense as well.
Speak for yourself. I am KHHV and extremely low in neuroticism. I also happen to have a higher-than-average IQ which seems consonant with the study I appended above. I do agree that we have a lot of neurotics in here but we have a lot of retards like @Devoteecel too so that means nothing.
 
Speak for yourself. I am KHHV and extremely low in neuroticism. I also happen to have a higher-than-average IQ which seems consonant with the study I appended above. I do agree that we have a lot of neurotics in here but we have a lot of retards like @Devoteecel too so that means nothing.
Then you're an exception. Women in general are attracted to lower neuroticism. The incel stereotype is a shy, anxious, neurotic unattractive loser.
 
Politics/ideology/all the social shit are not a "hard" subject. They're soft sciences. There is plenty of space for subjective evaluation in it, doesn't necessarily mean it's wrong as subjective evaluations are also based on reality.
"Soft science" does not imply that you can get with saying anything without the evidence to back it up. Psychology is a soft science too and yet it should be obvious that psychosis is a real, objective phenomenon.
 
"Soft science" does not imply that you can get with saying anything without the evidence to back it up. Psychology is a soft science too and yet it should be obvious that psychosis is a real, objective phenomenon.
And I'm not just saying anything. But dismissing reflection and anecdotal experience is not the way to go if you admit that.
 
And I'm not just saying anything. But dismissing reflection and anecdotal experience is not the way to go if you admit that.
I guess I should specify that both are grounded in reality, as much as you'd like not to think so. And I do have seen and researched enough to prove my beliefs to myself. I just don't have it saved with me, obviously, and I'm not going to bother looking for it again.
 
Being economically left-wing is for faggots. Imagine thinking you deserve stuff for free from the government. You need to work to earn that stuff. I don't want my taxes to be paying for whores, single mothers, abortions, the elderly, or lazy ass students. Even poor Chads will get laid while I don't, why should my taxes pay for these retards?

I myself wanna make a lot of money, so I can escape inceldom. I'm blackpilled about my looks and my heigh, but I'm economically redpilled.
 
Being economically left-wing is for faggots. Imagine thinking you deserve stuff for free from the government. You need to work to earn that stuff. I don't want my taxes to be paying for whores, single mothers, abortions, the elderly, or lazy ass students. Even poor Chads will get laid while I don't, why should my taxes pay for these retards?

I myself wanna make a lot of money, so I can escape inceldom. I'm blackpilled about my looks and my heigh, but I'm economically redpilled.
Tbh surprises me not.

State of .is 2025 (even though I'm a 2024 user).
 
Tbh surprises me not.

State of .is 2025 (even though I'm a 2024 user).
Your account is only 4 months older than mine. You're not so far away from me.
 
You're a teen, that fondled your cousins balls, and molested your dog. I can't take anything you say seriously. It doesn't surprise me that you're a leftist though :feelskek:
 
You're a teen, that fondled your cousins balls, and molested your dog. I can't take anything you say seriously. It doesn't surprise me that you're a leftist though :feelskek:
Judgementals me for talking about stuff that I did as a retarded child against me
 

Similar threads

DarkStar
Replies
145
Views
1K
based_meme
B
AsiaCel
Replies
26
Views
698
AsiaCel
AsiaCel
WeirdPanda
Replies
15
Views
357
pulp
pulp

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top