Title. I did some halfass research And it seems like every subspecies is always reproductively isolated from other subspecies (obviously) and their territories, when they rarely overlaps, do so only very slightly. Can’t find shit about the dynamics between those subspecies in the overlapping territory..
Has there ever been a single documented instance of observing 2 subspecies of some species sharing the same habitat, with no more intersubspecies violence than is usual for that species ?
I seriously doubt this has ever happened or can happen.. And even a peaceful coexistence would be untenable, as any rate of interbreeding would , after not too long, result in a phenotypically homogenous population. And if they are 2 subspecies, then by definition they are reproductively compatible, so interbreeding would occur, Probabaly biased towards one Subspecies (thanks hypergamous foids)
This would be a checkmate for the “Hurr durr diversity is a strength” retards.
I would wager that any instance of subspecies interactions would produce more violence/conflict than is typical of the species, particularly with the males, and the degree of conflict would be proportional to the genetic distance between them..
would explain nogs vs whites in the west. Even though so far the west’s timeline/experiment with diversity (from 1965+) is Probabaly not Long enough to draw conclusions from, and plus we are under unnatural stressors and behavior modifying things like rule of law so group conflict would have to reach some minimum threshold to BTFO rule of law (the states guns at everybody’s head) and become visible..
And anecdotally I hear Australians have The same problems with aboriginals there - the niggers of Australia. Huge genetic distance between natives and aboriginals, same with whites vs blacks here.. add to that the inherent incompatibility with abos/nogs and the type of civilization most adaptive with whites, a genetically distant group, and you can see where nog grievances come from. Diversity would at BEST, be totally neutral, at worst fatal, and most likely IMO will result in modifying the current system with blacks in mind and relegating whites/Asians/etc to the common denominator of blacks. Basically either America/the west turns into Africa (or some kind of civilization that presents the least amount of resistance/stress when being interfaced with by blacks), or else they bitch about racism because competitive processes of natural selection do not put them in the positions of power they want, and then they burn down the country.
/rant
Has there ever been a single documented instance of observing 2 subspecies of some species sharing the same habitat, with no more intersubspecies violence than is usual for that species ?
I seriously doubt this has ever happened or can happen.. And even a peaceful coexistence would be untenable, as any rate of interbreeding would , after not too long, result in a phenotypically homogenous population. And if they are 2 subspecies, then by definition they are reproductively compatible, so interbreeding would occur, Probabaly biased towards one Subspecies (thanks hypergamous foids)
This would be a checkmate for the “Hurr durr diversity is a strength” retards.
I would wager that any instance of subspecies interactions would produce more violence/conflict than is typical of the species, particularly with the males, and the degree of conflict would be proportional to the genetic distance between them..
would explain nogs vs whites in the west. Even though so far the west’s timeline/experiment with diversity (from 1965+) is Probabaly not Long enough to draw conclusions from, and plus we are under unnatural stressors and behavior modifying things like rule of law so group conflict would have to reach some minimum threshold to BTFO rule of law (the states guns at everybody’s head) and become visible..
And anecdotally I hear Australians have The same problems with aboriginals there - the niggers of Australia. Huge genetic distance between natives and aboriginals, same with whites vs blacks here.. add to that the inherent incompatibility with abos/nogs and the type of civilization most adaptive with whites, a genetically distant group, and you can see where nog grievances come from. Diversity would at BEST, be totally neutral, at worst fatal, and most likely IMO will result in modifying the current system with blacks in mind and relegating whites/Asians/etc to the common denominator of blacks. Basically either America/the west turns into Africa (or some kind of civilization that presents the least amount of resistance/stress when being interfaced with by blacks), or else they bitch about racism because competitive processes of natural selection do not put them in the positions of power they want, and then they burn down the country.
/rant
