You guys don't seem to realize that nobody, not even Chad, gets love from women.
Sure sure, you're about to argue with me. You're about to tell me about some roastie who sold her house and gave all the money to Chad. But you should hear me out first. What women do for Chad, they don't do out of "love."
The tl;dr is that we have this one word, "love" and we use it for at least a dozen different instincts and emotions. What you feel toward women, and what you wish a woman would feel for you ...you call that "love" - but only men feel that. What women feel is something different.
You know how it feels when you see a girl, and I'm not talking about a supermodel here, just a regular girl, and she's cute, and maybe she laughs ...and it's just physically painful in your chest? The label you give to that emotion is "love." But then someone comes up to you and says, "omg I love ice cream!" - you do realize that you are feeling something different than the person who loves ice cream, right?
That's what I'm getting at. We're all using the same word, but we are experiencing different emotions.
And no woman feels "love" (by which I mean, the thing you are feeling) for a man.
Why do I believe this? Because I understand evolution. I know the source of our instincts, and the mechanism of their instantiation in us, as conscious rational beings. I know where your feelings come from, and I know why you feel them.
What natural selection "wants" for males is to (1) attract them to females sexually, but then also, (2) bond the male to the female so that he protects and provisions her until a child is birthed and weened.
Instinct (1) for males is broad. Almost every woman you see is sexually attractive to some degree - actually, the degree to which they're attractive is directly proportional to their fertility. Women do also possess instinct (1), but it's narrow and focused ...and takes into account many more variables than the male version.
Also, instinct (1) for men is active - it makes you want to do something (i.e. fuck). Instinct (1) for women is passive. It makes them receptive. It makes them want to be taken.
So, we're feeling very different things just in terms of instinct (1). The difference between us grows even larger after this. Women do not possess instinct (2). There's literally no purpose for it, in terms of natural selection. Actually, it might even be a disadvantage for them to have it!
What's supposed to happen, in our species, is that the male feels (1) for almost all women. Then, if he's the top male, many women also feel (1) for him. But, women are supposed to deny him sex out of fear of getting pregnant. Eventually, one of the women will trigger in him instinct (2). Then, it's clear he's in that state, then she has sex with him.
After that, the other women in the tribe shift their focus to man #2 and repeat the process. In this way, every man and woman pair off. It works really well ...but it doesn't require instinct (2) or anything like it, in women. Actually, the closest thing women have to instinct (2) is probably just fear - fear that instinct (2) will stop functioning and she'll lose her man.
Anyway, we use this one word, "love" for all these instincts, and even for other feelings like wanting ice cream. But they're actually markedly different things.
If you owned an ice cream store and you had this vague concept that, "some people love ice cream" but then you looked at how men express their love for women - maybe you saw the Taj Mahal - then you said, "I want people to love my ice cream the same way" <--- that kind of makes you retarded.
You need to understand that there's a difference between the way that men love women, and the way that people like ice cream. You need to understand that and set reasonable expectations for yourself. Same deal here. Women don't feel instinct (2) - they don't even feel it for Chad.
So why did statie sell her house and give all her money to Chad? It's not because of love (instinct 2). It's because she is competing with other women in a state of instinct (1). It's much closer to a bunch of simps giving money to an OF girl than it is to actual love.
It's unreasonable to every expect a woman to love you. The best you could ever get (and let's be honest, none of us here will ever get this either) is receptivity (instinct 1) followed by getting her pregnant, followed by fear that you'll leave. That would make her act right, but it still wouldn't be love. And the worst part is, the government has made it so that they don't feel fear either.
