In the animal kingdom, most species follow a pattern: the sex with lower gamete production and scarcer reproductive resources calls the shots.
Human females hold inherent value because they’re biologically equipped to reproduce they carry the rare, complex egg.
An egg isn’t just a cell; it’s a selective gatekeeper.
To fertilize it, you’ve gotta be a ‘perfect’ candidate.
Meanwhile, males produce sperm in massive quantities.
Sperm are cheap, disposable, and unless they’re elite, they die off.
This means men, biologically speaking, have no inherent value.
Their worth depends on what they bring to the table—skills, status, or survival traits—to even get a shot at passing their genes. Women, though?
Their value is baked into their role as the egg-bearers.
An egg’s scarcity and selectivity make women the ultimate arbiters.
Without proving utility, men are irrelevant. But women have this advantage because need of continuing the bloodline and humans into next generation.
Human females hold inherent value because they’re biologically equipped to reproduce they carry the rare, complex egg.
An egg isn’t just a cell; it’s a selective gatekeeper.
To fertilize it, you’ve gotta be a ‘perfect’ candidate.
Meanwhile, males produce sperm in massive quantities.
Sperm are cheap, disposable, and unless they’re elite, they die off.
This means men, biologically speaking, have no inherent value.
Their worth depends on what they bring to the table—skills, status, or survival traits—to even get a shot at passing their genes. Women, though?
Their value is baked into their role as the egg-bearers.
An egg’s scarcity and selectivity make women the ultimate arbiters.
Without proving utility, men are irrelevant. But women have this advantage because need of continuing the bloodline and humans into next generation.
Last edited:
