Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [Hypothesis] Height is more important than race

  • Thread starter deathgreetsmeslow
  • Start date
deathgreetsmeslow

deathgreetsmeslow

Captain
★★★
Joined
Nov 18, 2017
Posts
1,729
Whether you believe Face>Race>eight or Face>height>race is a big discussion around here. This is not a thread disputing JBW, which has been statistically proven.

Some blackpills for manlets upcoming. When you are very short (manlet status) or anywhere around the average height of a female, around 5'4" according to all major stats, then you will have much lower SMV. and you will be dropped 2-4 points depending on how short you are. On top of that your height will automatically indicate before foids meet you that you are not AS fit for reproduction. When honest, foids admit they want to make Amazon children and sports athletes when given the chance, and a tall Chad or tall Chadlite provides this.

Unfortunately everything seems stacked against manlets. They are considered young despite what age they might be simply due to their height, and people automatically want to follow tall Chads and assume they are the authority. Tall Chads make more money on average than short people, and are often in positions of power or status according to this article.

http://www.businessinsider.com/tall-people-are-richer-and-successful-2015-9

One 2004 study found that the taller you are, the more you earn. In fact, according to that study, a person who is 6 feet tall would be predicted to earn nearly $166,000 more over the course of a 30-year career than someone who clocks in at 5 feet 5 inches. (The researchers observed those results even when they controlled for gender.)

In fact, the article is based on a study that states taller people obtain better social skills due to this natural halo effect, among other societal perception. Its not that tall people are always smarter or leaders, but due to being tall they are supported by their environment to become this way.

Additionally, if you take a look at short celebrities (around 5'5" or below is my barometer for a short celebirty) they are constantly mogged by their acting peers. Take Josh Hutcherson for example. Perfectly normal, attractive young man. A few years younger than some of his peers in these photos, but what is the perception from the audeience... or worse the pervception of an average roastie?

b4d446faabdf81b9eed5941efe136d64.jpg


how-tall-is-josh-hutcherson.jpg

53af7bc91125074a137d82360f80fed6.jpg


So this is not to be down on manlets or anything like that, but I think it should be open to discussion whether manletism is a bigger SMV factor than race. This also helps put to rest any argument that some short guys here are not incel, espcially considering being an unusually short man lowers your value 3-4 points on avg in the eyes of women.

Over


As you can see this tweet has now received 300k+ likes. In general women treat short men with very little respect, without ever considering their "personality" or face, or even RACE. I could post countless different versions of this tweet, but its not needed.
 
Its obvious really.
I don't understand why still so many people around here dispute this theory.
It makes sense for females to be more attracted to height rather than to the face.
If a male is taller, he is more likely to be strong enough to protect his mate and their children.
Having a chad's face while being a manlet doesn't increase your survival chances.
As long as you don't have a subhuman face and you are tall you still have a chance to score.
 
Height at the very least gets you noticed more. It increases your social standing period.
 
height>face<race
 
i thought this at first but stats proved me to be very wrong.

@Bronzehawkattack bring out the racepill
 
pic related
 

Attachments

  • height vs face.jpg
    height vs face.jpg
    30.4 KB · Views: 165
Its obvious really.
I don't understand why still so many people around here dispute this theory.
It makes sense for females to be more attracted to height rather than to the face.
If a male is taller, he is more likely to be strong enough to protect his mate and their children.
Having a chad's face while being a manlet doesn't increase your survival chances.
As long as you don't have a subhuman face and you are tall you still have a chance to score.
 
Nope if you are an indian you are DONE. Height means nothing as long as you are not under 5'7, if you are legit 5'7 its not that short IRL, only online.
 
Height at the very least gets you noticed more. It increases your social standing period.

Manlets are hated in all aspects of life where ugly tall men are only hated sexually
 
Nope if you are an indian you are DONE. Height means nothing as long as you are not under 5'7, if you are legit 5'7 its not that short IRL, only online.
im 5'7 and im a total manlet
 
Agree. Nothing dries pussy faster than short men. It's over for shorties
 
Very good post

and

a-cote-de-taylor-swift-bruno-mars-est-tout.png
22


ed5d81bb.jpg
(he has very good face but foids still want tall)
 
Girls don't give a damn about race just aesthetics and while she probably won't think a black man is "cute" she'll probably still want to fuck him as long as he's tall and has a good face.
 

Similar threads

Anarcho Nihilist
Replies
24
Views
425
ResidentHell
ResidentHell
Blackpillologist
Replies
37
Views
1K
prajeet88
prajeet88
To koniec
Replies
21
Views
273
To koniec
To koniec
bEpRi
Replies
23
Views
687
Man
Man

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top