JFL Hypergamy is so fucking stoopid

[Fancy Alcoholic]

All women praise 10 to 5% men as if this system was viable to begin with.

Consider this : even if Chad is a gigaslayer who has nothing to do in life except have sex with all foids that want him, HE CAN'T PHYSIOLOGICALLY assume such a burden as entertain the amount of foids that is willing to be entertained by him.

Even if he wanted, he would fail miserably, he couldn't financially support their child alimony, he couldn't be there all the time to jester maXx, and most foids would still be unsatisfied and fall in the "female depression" meme because 5% of men is nothing compared to 99% of foids anyway.


This is elementary school tier math knowledge, really. Why do foids think this is possible ?


View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLjK61sNlRQ

 

[WawelDragon1683]

Why do foids think this is possible ?

I don't think women are capable of rational thought. They just go after whoever makes their pussy wet. No matter the consequences.

 

[Gymcelled]

If women had reasonable expectations they wouldn't be hypergamous to begin with. One implies the other and vice versa

 

[Lebensmüder]

If women had reasonable expectations they wouldn't be hypergamous to begin with. One implies the other and vice versa

Nothing makes sense in our modern world teleologically speaking. If women decide to kill their unborn children when they have defects like Down's Syndrome it is celebrated as an expression of liberty and "freedom", if a eugenicist said that aborting disabled people would be favorable they would lynch him although ultimately speaking the consequence is the same: Disabled kids bite the dust.

One thing would be Nazi-like (and therefore of course the expression of ultimate evil in our post-WWII-soyciety) and the other thing is "freedom" - certain acts and words are wrong when they come from the wrong people. And another thing: Women have replaced god in our postmodern and atheistic so(y)ciety and therefore offending or even just questioning them is generally seen as the ultimate act of heresy. This is why they talk about stigmas affecting Asian men in dating sometimes, but all strategies for solution would be seen as monstrous, you cannot even talk about many problems regarding women, but even when you do you just "have to accept it" (Why?) without criticizing them or wanting to enforce a change in their respective behavior (while the same thing would never be true for man which don't behave in a way that modernity deems as acceptable).

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

Nothing makes sense in our modern world teleologically speaking. If women decide to kill their unborn children when they have defects like Down's Syndrome it is celebrated as an expression of liberty and "freedom", if a eugenicist said that aborting disabled people would be favorable they would lynch him although ultimately speaking the consequence is the same: Disabled kids bite the dust.

One thing would be Nazi-like (and therefore of course the expression of ultimate evil in our post-WWII-soyciety) and the other thing is "freedom" - certain acts and words are wrong when they come from the wrong people. And another thing: Women have replaced god in our postmodern and atheistic so(y)ciety and therefore offending or even just questioning them is generally seen as the ultimate act of heresy. This is why they talk about stigmas affecting Asian men in dating sometimes, but all strategies for solution would be seen as monstrous, you cannot even talk about many problems regarding women, but even when you do you just "have to accept it" (Why?) without criticizing them or wanting to enforce a change in their respective behavior (while the same thing would never be true for man which don't behave in a way that modernity deems as acceptable).

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T2RonyJ_Ts

MUH FREEEDOM

They don't, that's the only reason they marry normies and consequently divorce rape them.

High IQ

 

[Lebensmüder]

View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7T2RonyJ_Ts

MUH FREEEDOM

Freedom is in our modern so(y)ciety nothing more than a tautology that gets repeated over and over again, freedom nowadays only exists for the sake of freedom without even questioning the desirability of freedom in itself. No other so(y)ciety saw freedom as something that should come without merit and to anyone because they knew about the socially destructive consequences that would arise from the implementation of social freedom without responsibilities.

Freedom is ultimately defined as an abscence of order and without order we have darwinism and this is exactly what we see nowadays: In the past eras there were groups like nations, religions, ideologies like capitalism/communism, etc. and people who belonged to a group had a certain worth automatically and most aggressions were done to members of the out-group, with the abolishment of all orders and the group identity we devolved into a state where we nowadays have an expanded battle zone in every aspect of life (e.g. romance, jobs, etc.).

The conflict between nations/religions/ideologies was thereby replaced by a competition between all individuals on the planet where all people are natural enemies and fight for the scraps while the mighty corporations/politicians and on a more local level the chads/women flourish in excess. The aggressions that were canalized into a competition between groups and therefore expressed in a controlled manner are nowadays uncontrollably expressed against everyone by everyone (in jobs/in relationships/etc.), the implementation of freedom meant nothing more than the total destruction of the individual worth (unless that individual belongs to a protected class or to the A-class).

This is why our modern world feels so shitty despite our material comfort and the lack of real threat for our lifes: 1) the true and honest macroaggression and open confrontation has nowadays been replaced by dozens and dozens of deeply dishonest and passively done microaggressions under plausible deniability (the same as with macroauthoritarianism, they don't throw in jail for misbehaving, they take away your job, everything under plausible deniability and without dirty hands), 2) the individual value is nowadays not existant anymore, you don't have a value unless you fight for it, but you don't even know your enemies and fight a fight against everyone and everything, 3) restrictions are selectively put on people and this is why women/chads can behave in all manners of abhorrent ways without penalization while even the slightest hint of frustration that we (as losers in the current system) feel is pathologized. We replaced a big, macroscopic war with many small wars.

 

[Gymcelled]

Nothing makes sense in our modern world teleologically speaking. If women decide to kill their unborn children when they have defects like Down's Syndrome it is celebrated as an expression of liberty and "freedom", if a eugenicist said that aborting disabled people would be favorable they would lynch him although ultimately speaking the consequence is the same: Disabled kids bite the dust.

One thing would be Nazi-like (and therefore of course the expression of ultimate evil in our post-WWII-soyciety) and the other thing is "freedom" - certain acts and words are wrong when they come from the wrong people. And another thing: Women have replaced god in our postmodern and atheistic so(y)ciety and therefore offending or even just questioning them is generally seen as the ultimate act of heresy. This is why they talk about stigmas affecting Asian men in dating sometimes, but all strategies for solution would be seen as monstrous, you cannot even talk about many problems regarding women, but even when you do you just "have to accept it" (Why?) without criticizing them or wanting to enforce a change in their respective behavior (while the same thing would never be true for man which don't behave in a way that modernity deems as acceptable).

If you tell men or children that they have to lose weight because obesity is unhealthy people react well.
If you tell obese women to lose weight you get socially shredded for it

 

[Fancy Alcoholic]

Freedom is in our modern so(y)ciety nothing more than a tautology that gets repeated over and over again, freedom nowadays only exists for the sake of freedom without even questioning the desirability of freedom in itself. No other so(y)ciety saw freedom as something that should come without merit and to anyone because they knew about the socially destructive consequences that would arise from the implementation of social freedom without responsibilities.

Freedom is ultimately defined as an abscence of order and without order we have darwinism and this is exactly what we see nowadays: In the past eras there were groups like nations, religions, ideologies like capitalism/communism, etc. and people who belonged to a group had a certain worth automatically and most aggressions were done to members of the out-group, with the abolishment of all orders and the group identity we devolved into a state where we nowadays have an expanded battle zone in every aspect of life (e.g. romance, jobs, etc.).

The conflict between nations/religions/ideologies was thereby replaced by a competition between all individuals on the planet where all people are natural enemies and fight for the scraps while the mighty corporations/politicians and on a more local level the chads/women flourish in excess. The aggressions that were canalized into a competition between groups and therefore expressed in a controlled manner are nowadays uncontrollably expressed against everyone by everyone (in jobs/in relationships/etc.), the implementation of freedom meant nothing more than the total destruction of the individual worth (unless that individual belongs to a protected class or to the A-class).

This is why our modern world feels so shitty despite our material comfort and the lack of real threat for our lifes: 1) the true and honest macroaggression and open confrontation has nowadays been replaced by dozens and dozens of deeply dishonest and passively done microaggressions under plausible deniability (the same as with macroauthoritarianism, they don't throw in jail for misbehaving, they take away your job, everything under plausible deniability and without dirty hands), 2) the individual value is nowadays not existant anymore, you don't have a value unless you fight for it, but you don't even know your enemies and fight a fight against everyone and everything, 3) restrictions are selectively put on people and this is why women/chads can behave in all manners of abhorrent ways without penalization while even the slightest hint of frustration that we (as losers in the current system) feel is pathologized. We replaced a big, macroscopic war with many small wars.

Zeta High IQ ngl

 

[Pikacel]

Hypergamy is too unstable. Even if a foid bags Chad, what happens if the top 0.5% gigachad comes along? A bunch of kids raised in a broken home. The only ways to maintain stability are for men to be cucks and stay loyal while their wife fucks chad, for women to be dependent on men somehow and/or for disloyal whores to be ostracised and punished

 

[TallCelFag]

Would be funny if the reverse happened, men becoming attracted to young stacies exclusively.