Human is a biorobot who fucks and eats. Is it worthy of existence? It is the same as existence of worm.
We have a lot of " humanitarian" sentiments. But what are they in their essence? It is nothing, " humanitarianism" has no any logical justifucation at all.
What are morals then? Just a whim of the legacy of past tradition.
What are human rights since human being has no any valid philosophical justification of its existence. It is nothing. It is just a whim.
What is the truly valid philosophical justification of society - there is none.
We abide old fashioned sentements because of habit to do so.
The civilisation ridicilously devoid of everything thay can protect itself against the truth.
There is not even rat's ass to all of it.
All your rights are fucking void.
So you insist on brainless pursuit of hapliness - whatever it means- but what do justify your whim to satisfie your animal instincts of pleasure that abide nothing than mindless whim of nature. You want your happiness because nature wants you to fuck and suck, - but there is no true philosophical justification of blind, premordial instincts of nature. Nature is immoral and so you are with your animal like " pursuit if happiness" for no good reason but for suffering of those at whose expence you are nicely happy.
But people dont think they just want - but when one asks them what is the sane meaning of all this human rights and pursuits of hapliness they have nothing to say. They just want it like animals thoughlessly.
All the civilisation is based on "i want" . But what if everybody starts to folllow the famous Crowely's meme knowing that is only one law is " i want"? At least dont speak about entitlement , dubious human rights and morals since there is only one right- the right of strongest.
We have a lot of " humanitarian" sentiments. But what are they in their essence? It is nothing, " humanitarianism" has no any logical justifucation at all.
What are morals then? Just a whim of the legacy of past tradition.
What are human rights since human being has no any valid philosophical justification of its existence. It is nothing. It is just a whim.
What is the truly valid philosophical justification of society - there is none.
We abide old fashioned sentements because of habit to do so.
The civilisation ridicilously devoid of everything thay can protect itself against the truth.
There is not even rat's ass to all of it.
All your rights are fucking void.
So you insist on brainless pursuit of hapliness - whatever it means- but what do justify your whim to satisfie your animal instincts of pleasure that abide nothing than mindless whim of nature. You want your happiness because nature wants you to fuck and suck, - but there is no true philosophical justification of blind, premordial instincts of nature. Nature is immoral and so you are with your animal like " pursuit if happiness" for no good reason but for suffering of those at whose expence you are nicely happy.
But people dont think they just want - but when one asks them what is the sane meaning of all this human rights and pursuits of hapliness they have nothing to say. They just want it like animals thoughlessly.
All the civilisation is based on "i want" . But what if everybody starts to folllow the famous Crowely's meme knowing that is only one law is " i want"? At least dont speak about entitlement , dubious human rights and morals since there is only one right- the right of strongest.
Last edited:
