
ALifeWastedOnRot
Captain
★★★★★
- Joined
- May 16, 2025
- Posts
- 1,963
I'm serious, everytime I speak to somebody they have no solution to balance the budget. They just say something like "tax the rich"..
Problem is online shopping and illegals are good for the economy since online shopping creates efficeicnies and illegals grow a lot of the farm crops.Remove illegals, stop funding wars, anti online shopping (save the high street), private investment into sport (create jobs), films, musicians, athletes, manufacturers will be PEOPLE jobs.
Overall whatever I can do to reduce unemployment because obviously I someone who was taking out is putting in I’m going to reduce the deficit.
I’ll import workers when the unemployment isn’t 4-5% mateProblem is online shopping and illegals are good for the economy since online shopping creates efficeicnies and illegals grow a lot of the farm crops.
The lazy ones yes, the ones who actually need it noI'd be all for cutting their welfare and deporting the gang members but the hard workers can stay.
Do away with green is good.Decrease the budgetary apparatus both in size and scope, INVEST in profitable industry (as a government) even through debt, fire non essential cops like traffic etc., do away with green policies.
How will you get the unemployment rate down without using immigration to boost the economy?I’ll import workers when the unemployment isn’t 4-5% mate
The lazy ones yes, the ones who actually need it no
By fucking low skill workers off and training up our own.How will you get the unemployment rate down without using immigration to boost the economy?
Some can stay but majority of them need to go mate along with ALL ai and robotsAnd im talking actually hard working immigrants not gangmembers.
I seeBy fucking low skill workers off and training up our own.
No A.I and robots are based.Some can stay but majority of them need to go mate along with ALL ai and robots
America used to be 90%+ white just a while ago and had no problems producing food. It's not like (white) americans aren't willing to get jobs. They are just taken by the masses of unskilled Mexicans who work for shit wages that they just remittance to their own country anyways and it leaves our economy. Make America put itself first again instead of putting the rich Jews and their Mexican invaders first.How will you get the unemployment rate down without using immigration to boost the economy?
And im talking actually hard working immigrants not gangmembers.
The problem with American workers is they don't remit the money to Mexico, they keep the money in America which drives up inflation. I want to keep the hard working immigrants here because I'm America First, that's why I want to expand immigration of those who are actually hard working, I don't think America can survive without it.America used to be 90%+ white just a while ago and had no problems producing food. It's not like (white) americans aren't willing to get jobs. They are just taken by the masses of unskilled Mexicans who work for shit wages that they just remittance to their own country anyways and it leaves our economy. Make America put itself first again instead of putting the rich Jews and their Mexican invaders first.
Also immigration is entirely propagated by the Jews. Fuck them and their plans, idc if immigrants are hard workers, the goal is white genocide
View attachment 1467140View attachment 1467141View attachment 1467142View attachment 1467144View attachment 1467146View attachment 1467147View attachment 1467149
Have i twisted you're arm mate, kekNo A.I and robots are based.
A.I will enhance productivity.Have i twisted you're arm mate, kek
Productivity of crime and unemployment mateA.I will enhance productivity.
Not true, unemployment will fix itself as SRAS shifts right.Productivity of crime and unemployment mate
I'm not so sure this time around mateNot true, unemployment will fix itself as SRAS shifts right.
Mises institute wrote a great article on this.I'm not so sure this time around mate
That would reduce way more revenue than it would generate.-Reduce federal corporate tax rates to a flat 18% and to 12% after 10 years.
-Reduce federal income tax for everyone to a maximum of 15%
-Every airline landing at an American airport pays an extra fee of $1000 per flight/landing (tickets cost around $3-6 more). 100% of the money will go to the federal gov
-A tax of 0.5% on every car and house sale.
-Stop funding foreign wars and Israel
-Leave NATO
I know rich Americans who with their parents live here in Switzerland because of the relatively high US federal taxes.That would reduce way more revenue than it would generate.
This has been debunked.I know rich Americans who with their parents live here in Switzerland because of the relatively high US federal taxes.
And a number of other rich nationalities I don’t know personally.
Unfortunately I myself am not rich.
What I’m saying is, reducing taxes can increase revenue as it attracts rich people.
If what you're saying was true, I would support high taxes because that would drive down revenue and starve the government of money. If the Laffer Curve was true I'd be a huge advocate for tax hikes.The Swedish IKEA founder lives in Switzerland because of the shitty Swedish taxes. He pays millions in taxes here but saves millions too.
Low taxes do more good than high taxes
Like myself, Trump/the republicans are also mostly pro low taxes. Many rich foreigners literally live in countries like Switzerland (I’m not even Swiss, just live here), I went to an international school for 4 years with many rich foreigners. Or in countries like Monaco/Cyprus and UAE (Dubai).This has been debunked.
It is true, look it up. I don’t get your point, you’re saying exactly what I’m saying? I’m literally saying lowering taxes helps the economy.If what you're saying was true, I would support high taxes because that would drive down revenue and starve the government of money. If the Laffer Curve was true I'd be a huge advocate for tax hikes.
tax the rich
The Laffer curve is true though. Due to the tax avoidance (country avoidance). The Republicans use this theory and they are right!This has been debunked.
If what you're saying was true, I would support high taxes because that would drive down revenue and starve the government of money. If the Laffer Curve was true I'd be a huge advocate for tax hikes.
The Laffer curve says low taxes = increase revenue, so why do you say you’re pro tax hikes?This has been debunked.
If what you're saying was true, I would support high taxes because that would drive down revenue and starve the government of money. If the Laffer Curve was true I'd be a huge advocate for tax hikes.
They’re pro low taxes because they know that what you said was not trueLike myself, Trump/the republicans are also mostly pro low taxes. Many rich foreigners literally live in countries like Switzerland (I’m not even Swiss, just live here), I went to an international school for 4 years with many rich foreigners. Or in countries like Monaco/Cyprus and UAE (Dubai).
You’re actually making the exact opposite case, you’re saying low taxes destroys the economy. You’re saying lower taxes gives the government more revenueIt is true, look it up. I don’t get your point, you’re saying exactly what I’m saying? I’m literally saying lowering taxes helps the economy.
Look up where the higher concentration of millionaires and billionaires are - Germany or Switzerland
They’re pro low taxes because they know that what you said was not trueLike myself, Trump/the republicans are also mostly pro low taxes. Many rich foreigners literally live in countries like Switzerland (I’m not even Swiss, just live here), I went to an international school for 4 years with many rich foreigners. Or in countries like Monaco/Cyprus and UAE (Dubai).
You’re actually making the exact opposite case, you’re saying low taxes destroys the economyIt is true, look it up. I don’t get your point, you’re saying exactly what I’m saying? I’m literally saying lowering taxes helps the economy.
Look up where the higher concentration of millionaires and billionaires are - Germany or Switzerland
Because that’s the most efficient way to starve the government of moneyThe Laffer curve says low taxes = increase revenue, so why do you say you’re pro tax hikes?
It did survive without meximutt remittances. For a long time actually. If you don't believe that Charlie Kirk "America can still exist if its 90% Indian" bs then you should understand demographic replacement is actually the death of America and should be fought at all cost.I don't think America can survive without it.
What’s not true LMFAO. Never did I say high taxes are goodThey’re pro low taxes because they know that what you said was not true
No I’m not LMAO, are you drunk ?You’re actually making the exact opposite case, you’re saying low taxes destroys the economy
No, we argue for lower taxes because they want to decrease revenue and therefore have a political reason to cut social security, medicaid, food aid, and dept of education.What’s not true LMFAO. Never did I say high taxes are good
Your statement makes absolutely no sense. You literally asked how to lower the deficit.
I said lower taxes, as per the Laffer curve’s arguments. So I really don’t understand where I wasn’t clear.
Republicans argue for lower taxes because it increases government revenue !
Exactly, so if you're a right-winger you should oppose tax cuts. The whole goal of the right-wing is to starve the government of money so you can justify cutting taxes.No I’m not LMAO, are you drunk ?
The Laffer curve is exactly that. To increase government revenue.
You openly said that lower taxes gives the evil government more money to screw with the economy.I’m genuinely confused where I said low taxes destroy the economy. Your question was about the deficit (debt), not the economy… i said it both helps the economy and in turn the government! Exactly like the Laffer curve’s arguments (more investments and rich people)
Reagan's goal, according to his advisors like Friedman and Greenspan, was to justify spending cuts.Now i see.
When you’re saying republicans, are you talking about voters or politicians?
Politicians’ goal is always to increase money one way or another for the government, no?
The goal is to increase military spending, but cut entitlements to an even greater degree. The budget becomes closer to a balance.![]()
Ronald Reagan, supply-side economics, Reaganomics, economic policy, tax cuts, American economy, 1980s
billofrightsinstitute.org
More money for government - higher military budget
Ask Elon MushroomI'm serious, everytime I speak to somebody they have no solution to balance the budget. They just say something like "tax the rich"..