micropenis29
Banned
-
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2018
- Posts
- 4,183
I recently had a long discussion about inceldom with an intelligent Chad-lite at a bar. This was your standard 8/10 Chad-lite. 6'1, solid frame, white, blonde-haired, blue-eyed, and status-maxed.
I presented our case the best I could, using everything in my arsenal. Poured my heart and soul into my arguments, but was careful to not become emotional; I wanted the numbers, logic and reason to speak for themselves. I wanted to make the most of the opportunity, as I don't have a social circle and even if I did have one, it certainly wouldn't include any Chads.
I described our plight in as much detail as possible, citing Tinder data, male sexless statistics, Baumeister's research, etc.
He ultimately was unconvinced that there was any real problem. I was both confused and crushed. I hoped to make some headway, as he was clearly not a closed-minded normie by any stretch. His retort basically amounted to the following two points:
1. "Ugly men can always just pay for sex".
2. "Kind, loving, perfectly obedient sexbots, even if implemented, wouldn't even resemble real women because real women aren't like that at all".
Point (1) I felt was wrong (the 5'2 balding Indian janitor might be rejected by even the cheapest escorts).
And point (2) had me scratching my head. Are we fundamentally confused about what we want here? Do we want fake female desire or real female desire? And if we want the latter, maybe sexbots aren't the answer. Advancements in surgery might be the only way.
I presented our case the best I could, using everything in my arsenal. Poured my heart and soul into my arguments, but was careful to not become emotional; I wanted the numbers, logic and reason to speak for themselves. I wanted to make the most of the opportunity, as I don't have a social circle and even if I did have one, it certainly wouldn't include any Chads.
I described our plight in as much detail as possible, citing Tinder data, male sexless statistics, Baumeister's research, etc.
He ultimately was unconvinced that there was any real problem. I was both confused and crushed. I hoped to make some headway, as he was clearly not a closed-minded normie by any stretch. His retort basically amounted to the following two points:
1. "Ugly men can always just pay for sex".
2. "Kind, loving, perfectly obedient sexbots, even if implemented, wouldn't even resemble real women because real women aren't like that at all".
Point (1) I felt was wrong (the 5'2 balding Indian janitor might be rejected by even the cheapest escorts).
And point (2) had me scratching my head. Are we fundamentally confused about what we want here? Do we want fake female desire or real female desire? And if we want the latter, maybe sexbots aren't the answer. Advancements in surgery might be the only way.