I bet if he didn't miss they might overlook that.
The thing is, I don't think they would. They'd still be mocking him for being ugly. That's how normies/foids are, completely mindless, it's just about looks and the social ladder to them.
The point: Thomas Crooks was ugly, Luigi Mangione is attractive.
Everything you said in this reply was correct, you characterized how foids perceive Thomas Crooks perfectly. It all comes down to looks, the whole point of the blackpill is that this has always been the most important thing for success, social perception, everything.
Now just apply the same logic to Luigi Mangione, realizing he's attractive and this is why if anything foids place more emphasis on this than the act itself. (of course that's the reason anyone is talking about him at all, but that goes without saying.)
I mean they are now. what I meant was I don't think they would if he were just another person they saw.
Does not the fact that they talk about Thomas Crooks the way they do, purely for being ugly, demonstrate that it's all about looks to them? Ergo, if Luigi Mangione never killed Brian Thompson, the same people would still like him to the extent they found him attractive. By saying that many of the same people dismissing Thomas Crooks due to his looks would overlook his looks if he successfully shot and killed Trump, you're downplaying the significance of looks, in the face of the fact that women are emphasizing and praising the looks of Luigi Mangione. It's not consistent. What I'm saying is, again, many of these foids would be like - "Thomas Crooks killed Trump, but he's still ugly"
Basically, you're underestimating their superficiality with a misunderstanding of the "attraction to violence/criminality/antisocial/DT"/hybristophilia talking-point.
SilverBullet:
No. They blamed the reason for not liking him because he failed which is false. Why were foids on twitter asking for Luigi’s height and for his full face if him simply killing the CEO was all he needed to be thirsted for? People on soycial media were shitting on Crooks for his looks and would even if he succeeded
Luigi Mangione is maybe a 5/10. Average, not bad looking.
Thomas Matthew Crooks is a literal 1/10 so looks do matter but most of the people on this forum are not 1/10. I bet over half of everyone here looks better than him.
Depending on the foid Luigi Mangione is anywhere from a 6, 7, or even 8 for foids where he is their type. Luigi Mangione was definitely above average, the way foids talk about him online demonstrates this.
Thomas Matthew Crooks is a literal 1/10
This is wrong. Thomas Crooks was a 2 or 3, not a 1. A 1 means that they couldn't possibly be more unattractive. Thomas Crooks was certainly ugly and below average, but calling him a 1 is hyperbolic. He could've found a below average woman willing to sleep with him.
but most of the people on this forum are not 1/10. I bet over half of everyone here looks better than him.
It's true that most guys on this forum are not 1/10. Your basic point is correct, more than ever even average looking guys become incel or risk doing so. However, it's not necessarily true that the majority of users here are average/above average in facial attractiveness, you're being hyperbolic. This is also why you said Thomas Crooks was a 1/10. In reality he is a 2 or 3. (or 4 for a girl that's attracted to his general look.) He is below average, but not so below average he is a 1. Similarly, most guys here are likely at least somewhat below average in looks.
Women have time and time stated that they dont find men under 6 feet tall to be attractive. those same women suddenly like this guy despite the fact.
You're being extremely pedantic in a weak attempt to defend your broader stance. Luigi Mangione is 5'11'' so
just under 6'0. Foids are obviously attracted to him because of his face and he obviously was an adequate height. You're going out of your way to miss the point at this point. Yes, it is true they're picky about minute differences in height, but that doesn't mean you're doing anything other than straw-grasping right now.
So yes looks matter. Lots of average guys are incels because of the unrealistically high standards of women.
There are many average looking guys on this forum.
This is of course completely correct, so much so it goes without saying. None of us were denying this.
What's bizarre is your stance seems to be downplaying the extent looks matter. You acknowledge how they talked about Thomas Crooks for being ugly, but notably were hyperbolic about how ugly he was in a similar manner many of them would be. For Luigi Mangione, you actually downplay how attractive he is to make the argument it was more their desire to see killing than anything else.
Hell personally I think I look better than Luigi. We look similar in some ways. I've got wavy black hair, skinny, about the same height... Yet, women fucking hate me everywhere I go.
What is your height? You just said you are about the same height as him, but honestly this could mean anything unless you are specific. There could be other reasons they dislike you, assuming you aren't short. (if you were, that could be enough) Either way, this isn't to suggest it's your fault, but every factor must be taken into consideration. Assuming you have a good face and an adequate height, for all I know you possess a disability that accounts for the scorn from women. Also, women are racist even though no one but people like us are willing to acknowledge it. So your experience will be entirely different depending on whether or not you are white/European, something like Sicilian, Middle Eastern, South Asian, etc.
Yet I'm jealous as fuck because I've never in my got lucky with so much as a mere date with a girl. I literally scare women everywhere I go. Yet, I look similar enough to Luigi. Just without the smug smile and eyebrows not as thick.
Honestly something is off with these descriptions. I'm not sure what your height is, but it's been established by myself and the others on this thread from abundant evidence which is how foids online talk about Luigi Mangione that he
is attractive to them. It's quite evident that isn't the case with you, so while you may have similar facial features and traits to him, if women are as repulsed by you as you claim they are, then it seems clear your facial features are below average.
I'm just being thorough, not trying to be overbearing. I appreciate you read what I wrote and wrote a constructive response even though it's clear we're in disagreement. This is the only way things get anywhere.
