Some of you will say it’s not real because it’s based off of neurophysiological processes. I don’t agree since every aspect of ourselves has a biological component, unless you’re a spiritualcel I guess, which would mean nothing really exists.
So assuming it’s real, do you still want it? I think many here would agree that a woman’s love for a man stems form her perceiving the man as having a high SMV. Knowing this, would it bother you knowing a woman only loves you for superficial features? I ask this because it seems that the stereotypical love that is recognized by society, as seen in Disney fairy tales, and which many of us were were indoctrinated into believing,is not compatible with the black pilled understanding of love. I guess if I had to personally describe my past, child-like perception of love, a perception that I believe at least some of you here also possess, I would describe love as being a sort of unconditional intimacy, where the other person loves the other for who they are. That’s sounds great, right? Being loved for who you are? Well, once you explore what that means and your realize that “who you are”refers to more specific traits that reflect your quality of dna. And because love is dependent on these factors, you cannot say that love is unconditional. RealIzing all of this kind of shattered my naive views on love, and kind of destroyed the magic behind it. I’d compare it to figuring out how a magician performs a magic trick; once you figure out the inner workings of it, the magic is lost. And the awe that it used to induce, replaced by rationalization.
Anyways, do you still want love? If so, are you okay with the factors behind love?
So assuming it’s real, do you still want it? I think many here would agree that a woman’s love for a man stems form her perceiving the man as having a high SMV. Knowing this, would it bother you knowing a woman only loves you for superficial features? I ask this because it seems that the stereotypical love that is recognized by society, as seen in Disney fairy tales, and which many of us were were indoctrinated into believing,is not compatible with the black pilled understanding of love. I guess if I had to personally describe my past, child-like perception of love, a perception that I believe at least some of you here also possess, I would describe love as being a sort of unconditional intimacy, where the other person loves the other for who they are. That’s sounds great, right? Being loved for who you are? Well, once you explore what that means and your realize that “who you are”refers to more specific traits that reflect your quality of dna. And because love is dependent on these factors, you cannot say that love is unconditional. RealIzing all of this kind of shattered my naive views on love, and kind of destroyed the magic behind it. I’d compare it to figuring out how a magician performs a magic trick; once you figure out the inner workings of it, the magic is lost. And the awe that it used to induce, replaced by rationalization.
Anyways, do you still want love? If so, are you okay with the factors behind love?
