Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

How did the feminist hate propaganda become this successful?

V

virgin4life

Banned
-
Joined
Jun 22, 2018
Posts
4,157
Feminist hate propaganda has become extremely successful recently. Reddit, Youtube etc. all are biased against MRA, MGTOW, Incels etc. But how did feminism become this successful? Do powerful entities like huge corporations have an interest in feminism? I.e. do large corporations hope to get more female employees and thus lower wages as there is more competition? Do those companies dump cash on feminist hate groups? I just want to understand where all their power is coming from all of a sudden...
 
Academia and some politicians that "sympathise " with their cause, I guess.
 
(((They))) want ugly men bred out.
 
Feminist hate propaganda has become extremely successful recently. Reddit, Youtube etc. all are biased against MRA, MGTOW, Incels etc. But how did feminism become this successful? Do powerful entities like huge corporations have an interest in feminism? I.e. do large corporations hope to get more female employees and thus lower wages as there is more competition? Do those companies dump cash on feminist hate groups? I just want to understand where all their power is coming from all of a sudden...

They did become successful because of their brainwashing rhetoric that appealed to the weak minded with promises of "equality", "fairness" and "choice".

All they did was to trigger natural human mating strategies (genetical superiority trumping everything), and kick away thousands of years of conditioning and tradition.

Good times bred weak people and weak people bred preposterous ideas. Those ideas create a decline which in turn create bad times, and bad times breed good men. Good men create good times... and the circle continues.

If you are not convinced, see the fall of Rome and understand that what is happening today is analogous to what happened that much time ago. Degeneracy will bring our end.
 
Femoids have always been magnets for money. Before explicit feminism, charities focused on women always received shitloads of money. Naturally, they still do now, but everywhere foids go, money follows. You have to dig more into the anti-feminism side of mgtow to learn more about how gigantic and far reaching the entire Gynocentral Industrial Complex is. From domestic abuse shelters, to Title IX in the universities, to Equal Opportunity tax breaks, etc.

The "philosophy" of feminism is all just smoke and mirrors for the business of feminism and business is booming.
 
Feminist hate propaganda has become extremely successful recently. Reddit, Youtube etc. all are biased against MRA, MGTOW, Incels etc. But how did feminism become this successful? Do powerful entities like huge corporations have an interest in feminism? I.e. do large corporations hope to get more female employees and thus lower wages as there is more competition? Do those companies dump cash on feminist hate groups? I just want to understand where all their power is coming from all of a sudden...
It's simple really:. Feminism gives a lot of political clout. The biggeat, most relevant example is welfare:. The majority of welfare is spent on women (particularly single moms). Those are easy votes for the left, so they are going to support those programs and feminism as a whole to the detriment of everyone at else and society at large. This is something most rational people would define as evil

Of course the lobbyists supporting them and the companies they represent will take that opinion as well, and it snowballs from there.

That's a quick, short, simple answer.
 
Fucking whores all of them. I hate them all fucking cunts. I hate my mother too because she gave birth to me. Worthless cunts all of them.
 
"(((Who))) do you think owns the press?"
-Elon Musk
 
It's simple really:. Feminism gives a lot of political clout. The biggeat, most relevant example is welfare:. The majority of welfare is spent on women (particularly single moms). Those are easy votes for the left, so they are going to support those programs and feminism as a whole to the detriment of everyone at else and society at large. This is something most rational people would define as evil

Of course the lobbyists supporting them and the companies they represent will take that opinion as well, and it snowballs from there.

That's a quick, short, simple answer.
"the left" is again at it... :feelshehe:

The welfare problem is a symptom of man penalting child support and abortion rights. Welfare is not only helpful for women...


Feminism had genuin ideals in the beginning but it just got too popular and big money, virtue signaling retards and profiteers stepped in. (I know you won't believe me but gender relations were okay in feminist USSR for example). It is pretty much a suppresive ideology and fake ventile for libs and right alike today. Maybe it's even done in this way on purpose to split people and radicalizing each other to quietly reek in the money without anyone questioning the system.

Just the normal human hypocrisy.

The lowering of wages is achieved through other means tbh. (Paying media to demonize worker rights and declaring economical conservative bullshit as axioms etc.)
I pointed out in some discussion about increased female to male birth ratio, that the productivity increases per person even with females over a long time. So they must add some economical power, otherwise companies wouldn't simply employ them. The jobs are leggit needed on top and not just substitutes to lower the supply.
But sure more workers, more economical growth, more money for the shareholders. (Not necessarily bad, but in an optimal system the money would go to the workers and not to people who bought themselves in.)
 
Last edited:
Feminism is the natural way of things
 
Feminist hate propaganda has become extremely successful recently. Reddit, Youtube etc. all are biased against MRA, MGTOW, Incels etc. But how did feminism become this successful? Do powerful entities like huge corporations have an interest in feminism? I.e. do large corporations hope to get more female employees and thus lower wages as there is more competition? Do those companies dump cash on feminist hate groups? I just want to understand where all their power is coming from all of a sudden...

Take a closer look, they're starting to lose ground. Albeit slowly, it's happening.
 
"the left" is again at it... :feelshehe:

The welfare problem is a symptom of man penalting child support and abortion rights. Welfare is not only helpful for women...


Feminism had genuin ideals in the beginning but it just got too popular and big money, virtue signaling retards and profiteers stepped in. (I know you won't believe me but gender relations were okay in feminist USSR for example). It is pretty much a suppresive ideology and fake ventile for libs and right alike today. Maybe it's even done in this way on purpose to split people and radicalizing each other to quietly reek in the money without anyone questioning the system.

Just the normal human hypocrisy.

The lowering of wages is achieved through other means tbh. (Paying media to demonize worker rights and declaring economical conservative bullshit as axioms etc.)
I pointed out in some discussion about increased female to male birth ratio, that the productivity increases per person even with females over a long time. So they must add some economical power, otherwise companies wouldn't simply employ them. The jobs are leggit needed on top and not just substitutes to lower the supply.
But sure more workers, more economical growth, more money for the shareholders. (Not necessarily bad, but in an optimal system the money would go to the workers and not to people who bought themselves in.)

Look at the statistics on welfare. You could make the same arguement about alimony too, but just because a small fraction of a fraction of the cases are men who beat the system doesn't mean it isn't feminist bullshit.

Many companies have to hire women, if nothing else to prevent discrimination lawsuits. The last company I worked at gave every woman an extra $5000 or so a year to look more diversified, but none of them ever amounted to anything or worked well enough to make any significant moves upward.
 
Look at the statistics on welfare. You could make the same arguement about alimony too, but just because a small fraction of a fraction of the cases are men who beat the system doesn't mean it isn't feminist bullshit.

Many companies have to hire women, if nothing else to prevent discrimination lawsuits. The last company I worked at gave every woman an extra $5000 or so a year to look more diversified, but none of them ever amounted to anything or worked well enough to make any significant moves upward.

As I said it is true but, a result of partly unwanted children, failed marriages, lower amount of single dads and historically patriarchal structures in conservative companies probably as well.

I saw those statistics somewhere as well. But I can't find it anymore. Is there maybe some site in the US where data like this is collected?

Can you linke me to the law pls? I am not American. Are these federal laws for certain sectors or something?
 
Last edited:
As I said it is true but, a result of partly unwanted children, failed marriages and lower amount of single dads.

I saw those statistics somewhere as well. But I can't find it anymore. Is there maybe some site in the US where data like this is collected?

Can you linke me to the law pls? I am not American. Are these federal laws for certain sectors or something?
Uh-huh, and whose fault is that? 3/4 of divorces are initiated by women, dad's rarely get custoduly because of the gynocentric court system, and unwanted children are duebtonwhores whoring around with Chad. I don't know what your point is other than to reinforce what I wrote above.

I am not an attorney; I don't just have these laws bookmarked, you can findany of them just as easily as I can. Start by searching DBE and Title IX laws and affirmative action.
 
Uh-huh, and whose fault is that? 3/4 of divorces are initiated by women, dad's rarely get custoduly because of the gynocentric court system, and unwanted children are duebtonwhores whoring around with Chad. I don't know what your point is other than to reinforce what I wrote above.

I am not an attorney; I don't just have these laws bookmarked, you can findany of them just as easily as I can. Start by searching DBE and Title IX laws and affirmative action.
Exactly this, my point is it is not welfares fault.

There is no official law website? I only get long descriptive texts via google, but nvm.
 
Last edited:
But how did feminism become this successful?
I could write a fucking book about this, but the core answer is: money. The industrial revolution kickstarted feminism because it gave women a socially acceptable way of gaining money indipendently from their family. Money means power. When men were sent to be slaughtered in WW1, women effectively became the majority of workers at home. More money is more power. That's how they were able to get the vote.
After a century of snowball effect, here we are.
 
I still wonder how did the accepting of millions of low IQ, aggressive "refugees" from shitholes become normal in Europe, and how it will benefit Europe in any way?

Crime rates have risen by 30%, 90% of "refugees" live off of welfare, they are not getting any jobs, they are destroying Europe culturally.

And still, the majority of people in Germany and other countries is voting for Merkel or similar politicians. I mean something doesn't add up here.
 
Exactly this, my point is it is not welfares fault.

There is no official law website? I only get long descriptive texts via google, but nvm.
Welfare is as inherently broken as alimony. Both should be restricted to a year or two at the most.
 
Because it's the "in" thing to be a feminist.
plus too many cucks that validate those cunts
 
Welfare is as inherently broken as alimony. Both should be restricted to a year or two at the most.
Is it? What would be the alternative? Honest question. I probably know you answer but surprise me.

I still wonder how did the accepting of millions of low IQ, aggressive "refugees" from shitholes become normal in Europe, and how it will benefit Europe in any way?

Crime rates have risen by 30%, 90% of "refugees" live off of welfare, they are not getting any jobs, they are destroying Europe culturally.

And still, the majority of people in Germany and other countries is voting for Merkel or similar politicians. I mean something doesn't add up here.

Economical reasons and to make people want to vote afd a potential ideologically related future partner of cdu.

Crime rate is plumitting even with our War on Drugs. It is a symptom of relative poverty, speak social ostracization and lack of education anyway. If I remember correctly, a refugee is like fourty times more likely to comitt a crime. Still extremely low in total crimes per 1000 people. Don't have the numbers in my head anymore.
 
Last edited:
Personally, I can't wait until the degeneracy of society shuts down society as a whole, because then we can rise up and start over.
 
Feminist hate propaganda has become extremely successful recently. Reddit, Youtube etc. all are biased against MRA, MGTOW, Incels etc. But how did feminism become this successful? Do powerful entities like huge corporations have an interest in feminism? I.e. do large corporations hope to get more female employees and thus lower wages as there is more competition? Do those companies dump cash on feminist hate groups? I just want to understand where all their power is coming from all of a sudden...

When it combined with Leftism against White Heterosexual CIS Males. That's when it became successful. HOWEVER Islamic misogyny is soon enough blowing apart feminism quite literally left, right & centre.
 
Because it's easier to sell goodies, mugs and T shirt that say "this is how a proud feminist looks like" rather than goodies saying "I'm a male virgin and I will stay a virgin until my miserable death because of what society has become".

Positivity is a sell-out, negativity is just out.
 
Is it? What would be the alternative? Honest question. I probably know you answer but surprise me.



Economical reasons and to make people want to vote afd a potential ideologically related future partner of cdu.

Crime rate is plumitting even with our War on Drugs. It is a symptom of relative poverty, speak social ostracization and lack of education anyway. If I remember correctly, a refugee is like fourty times more likely to comitt a crime. Still extremely low in total crimes per 1000 people. Don't have the numbers in my head anymore.
People not buying useless crap and loving above their means and instead choosing to save their money.
 
Academia and some politicians that "sympathise " with their cause, I guess.
That and bluepilled betas who wanted pussy
Women only ever succeed because men allowed them to. Kek if there were no desperate betas who “sympathized”, women would have nothing and they’d be nothing.
 
People not buying useless crap and loving above their means and instead choosing to save their money.
You don't need to live above your means to fuck up financially after you lose your job. Most jobs don't pay anything anymore anyway. But even if you have leftover money you are encouraged by you peers to spend it otherwise you get ostracized. Consumerism and materialism is to deeply engraved into our todays culture. Both for the exact same reason. The elite can't get enough.
 
You don't need to live above your means to fuck up financially after you lose your job. Most jobs don't pay anything anymore anyway. But even if you have leftover money you are encouraged by you peers to spend it otherwise you get ostracized. Consumerism and materialism is to deeply engraved into our todays culture. Both for the exact same reason. The elite can't get enough.
All I see is a bunch of bullshit excuses until the very last sentence.

Yeah the wealth gap is ridiculously huge, and those who earn over a million a year should be taxed more heavily. Doesn't mean the lazy and incompetent should be handed free money for breathing or spitting out children they can't afford.
 
Well, same as we Incels they have human urges too, I guess. Lazy and incompetent are just degorative terms of the current economical reality. Most people really want to work and a now workless person could have been a highly seeked skilled labourer fifty years before. This ideological problem will break our neck anyway in the next years with the ongoing automatization. On the other side some people even don't have to work at all because their money "works" for them. But as we all now it's not the money, it's the people behind who do this work.

Don't forget that companies work against welfare as well to be able, to strongarm people into bad jobs out of a position of power.
 
All I see is a bunch of bullshit excuses until the very last sentence.

Yeah the wealth gap is ridiculously huge, and those who earn over a million a year should be taxed more heavily. Doesn't mean the lazy and incompetent should be handed free money for breathing or spitting out children they can't afford.

And how is this bullshit? This is just the reality, wtf.
Some are jews. But I try not to generalize.
:feelsohh:
 
Females spend the most shekels and (((they))) profit the most with having females be financially independent.
 
Preying on young dumb kids.
 

Similar threads

Sasukecel
Replies
76
Views
2K
XDFLAMEBOY
XDFLAMEBOY
Sasukecel
Replies
90
Views
2K
Sasukecel
Sasukecel
Shaktiman
Replies
16
Views
653
Hoppipolla
Hoppipolla
B
Replies
15
Views
527
Friezacel
Friezacel

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top