Serious Honestly, I'm not bitter at all.

[WhiteCel]

So many men have said it before, and better than I can...

...disorganized mentalcel ramblings...


I don't 'hate women', or want to control what they do with their vaginas,
I just want to be what they desire. Stringent sexual selection is necessary to produce
viable offspring, and without it, I wouldn't exist... I embrace sexual selection by females.


The only gripe I have is the influence of the media on the values of women.
The representation of phenotypes in the media effects the attitudes of the viewers toward analogous phenotypes IRL.
Promiscuity and broken homes depreciate the dignity of children, sex, and the very foundation of human lives.
We have been dehumanized, reduced to reproductive units rather than individuals, mere mortal meat.
No child should grow up fatherless, regardless of their race, their pedigree, their IQ...


You likely came from the womb of a woman who rejected dozens of incels and
lusted after 'chads' before settling for your father, remember that.
Come to peace with what you are, don't overthink your place in the world...
You occupy a completely arbitrary position in the normal variation of humanity, accept it.

 

[StillBitter]

I am StillBitter.

 

[ApoplecticRage]

Shouldn't sexual selection include traits like intelligence, integrity, compassion, etc.? The only thing women are "selecting" for is looks.

 

[Mainländer]

Against this Darwinian bullshit. It's not like foids are reproducing at their prime and only with Chads nowadays at all, OP.

 

[ApoplecticRage]

Before women were "lusting after chads", they were marrying men of character and other admirable traits. In what shape is humanity and civilization today? How has focusing almost entirely on looks served society?

You occupy a completely mediocre intellectual position on this forum. Accept it, rather than giving lectures on your first day.

 

[WhiteCel]

Against this Darwinian bullshit. It's not like foids are reproducing at their prime and only with Chads nowadays at all, OP.

I addressed that, that women eventually 'settle' for 'betabux' or whatever terminology tickles your fancies.

 

[Henry de Montherlant]

You occupy a completely arbitrary position in the normal variation of humanity, accept it.

Exactly like you ... We never denied that, what's the whole point ?

 

[WhiteCel]

Before women were "lusting after chads", they were marrying men of character and other admirable traits. In what shape is humanity and civilization today? How has focusing almost entirely on looks served society?

You occupy a completely mediocre intellectual position on this forum. Accept it, rather than giving lectures on your first day.

I recognize that some copes are too powerful to dispel...
You're only considering the West, ignoring the cultures where
'traditional' mate selection(whatever concept you have of that) is still ongoing, and you seem to have
invented an entire alternative history TBH, the burden of proof is on you to prove that women select
more for 'looks' and less for 'character' than they did in the past.


This is a very common coping mechanism, probably stemming from the 'chosen one' and 'misunderstood genius' tropes in popular fiction.

 

[ApoplecticRage]

I recognize that some copes are too powerful to dispel...
You're only considering the West, ignoring the cultures where
'traditional' mate selection(whatever concept you have of that) is still ongoing, and you seem to have
invented an entire alternative history TBH, the burden of proof is on you to prove that women select
more for 'looks' and less for 'character' than they did in the past.


This is a very common coping mechanism, probably stemming from the 'chosen one' and 'misunderstood genius' tropes in popular fiction.

Alternative history? Burden of proof? There are single mothers with kids from multiple men (called "losers" which is what roastie wall-hitters call chad after he uses them for tonsil bruising sessions for a while and then dismisses them) strewn across society. Women today find their "dates" on tinder and at college parties whereas they used to find them at church and through introductions through family and friends. Look at the family photos of grandparents and great grandparents and you will see a boatload of average and below average men smiling in wedding pictures with decent looking 23 year old girls who in most cases were virgins. Nice try dude. Post # 3: another FAIL.

 

[WhiteCel]

Alternative history? Burden of proof? There are single mothers with kids from multiple men (called "losers" which is what roastie wall-hitters call chad after he uses them for tonsil bruising sessions for a while and then dismisses them) strewn across society. Women today find their "dates" on tinder and at college parties whereas they used to find them at church and through introductions through family and friends. Look at the family photos of grandparents and great grandparents and you will see a boatload of average and below average men smiling in wedding pictures with decent looking 23 year old girls who in most cases were virgins. Nice try dude. Post # 2: another FAIL.

Yeah, yeah, I've heard this so many times man, you don't even know who you're talking to...
What are you trying to refute anyway? All I said was that I was against societal degeneration rather than female nature...
I literally agreed with you on all points except for your narcissistic delusions about your character and intellect.

 

[ApoplecticRage]

Yeah, yeah, I've heard this so many times man, you don't even know who you're talking to...
What are you trying to refute anyway? All I said was that I was against societal degeneration rather than female nature...
I literally agreed with you on all points except for your narcissistic delusions about your character and intellect.

*Makes ridiculous points and is effortlessly refuted (not a difficult task for most on this forum)

*Then resorts to saying "you don't even know who you're talking to..." as he calls me "narcissistic"

*Literally changes his story as he went from challenging statements I made to claiming that his issue is my personal attributes.

You're not having a good first day, Rene Descartes.

 

[Deleted member 677]

Surgery is the only way.

 

[WhiteCel]

*Makes ridiculous points and is effortlessly refuted (not a difficult task for most on this forum)

*Then resorts to saying "you don't even know who you're talking to..." as he calls me "narcissistic"

*Literally changes his story as he went from challenging statements I made to claiming that his issue is my personal attributes.

View attachment 20535

You're not having a good first day, Rene Descartes.

Your 'statements' about an idealistic past are coping mechanisms- you like to believe you would have been happier in the past...
...because men of high character and intellect(such as yourself) were more highly valued... That implies narcissism...
In reality women were simply more subdued... they weren't as free to ride the cock carousel(do I sound like in-group yet?)
they had to go straight to the betabux...

 

[ApoplecticRage]

Your 'statements' about an idealistic past are coping mechanisms- you like to believe you would have been happier in the past...
...because men of high character and intellect(such as yourself) were more highly valued... That implies narcissism...
In reality women were simply more subdued... they weren't as free to ride the cock carousel(do I sound like in-group yet?)
they had to go straight to the betabux...

Now you've contradicted yourself. First it was that our great grandmothers lusted after chads. They did NOT. Now the story has changed to "They did not lust after chads; instead they went straight for beta-bux."
You're also comically unaware that the term "beta-bux" is one of this era. The term can only exist in an environment in which women are going around lusting after alpha chads. My great grandfather, a 4/10, was not a "beta-bux" married to a 5.5/10 woman. He was a GOOD MAN.
I know your type. You can't accept the fact that you could ever be wrong about something. So after I do my bicycle ride, I'm sure I'll find your next iteration of pilpul.