Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Blackpill [Heightpill]Parental Height Differences Predict Need For A C-Section

DarkStar

DarkStar

I failed at life
★★★★★
Joined
Nov 20, 2022
Posts
11,211

Just when you thought those bastard femlets were not wretched enough for passing on their shitty genes & inflicting many poor souls with manletism, science comes around to hit us with another brutal blackpill reminder.

This study from the UK revealed quite some interesting patterns in regards to that of height & medical problems, so let's dive in:feelswhere:
Controlling for birth weight, maternal height had a negative effect on the occurrence of ECS. Shorter women were more likely to have had ECS compared to taller women, and this was a decelerating pattern as indicated by a significant quadratic effect of height (Table 3B; Figure 2A).
This also further reminds us that bad genes in general -face, height, intelligence, and even health- seem to all correlate & "come in packages" as others here pointed out.
Maternal height interacted with birth weight (Table 3C; Figure 2B), indicating that the risk resulting from the size of the newborn depended on the height of the mother
Obviously, I think it's common sense to know that most short women will have babies with a lower birth weight, which ofc links to:
Emergency cesarean is associated with a greater risk of severe neonatal outcome; with low birth weight, an additional independent risk factor for poor condition at birth.
To illustrate these findings, table 4A provides model predictions for the interaction between maternal height and birth weight. As expected, the highest risk for an ECS arises when short women carry heavy babies. Short women (below mean −1 s.d.) were more than twice as likely to need an ECS (46.3% versus 21.7%) than tall women (above mean +1 s.d.) when carrying a heavy newborn (above mean +1 s.d.). Generally, with increasing birth weight the risk of ECS also increased, but in tall women the risk of having ECS when carrying an average weight newborn was marginally lower compared to when having a light weight newborn (respectively 16.6% and 18.7%; Table 4A, see Table S2 and Figure S1 for model predictions across the entire range of female height).
Now this did find that foids whom have a c-section most commonly are short with overweight kids, however when compared to even more healthy foids, it shows quite the discrepancy between how even carrying an unhealthy fetus doesn't impact them as negatively as it does for shorter foids.

And for those whom are unfortunate to have a tall/tallish dad with a femlet mom:
Having a relatively tall compared to short partner increased the risk for ECS in average height women when carrying a heavy (from 25.9% to 32.6%) or average weighing newborn (from 18.6% to 20.9%; Table 4B). For average height women carrying light weight newborns, increasing PHD hardly changed the likelihood of an ECS (from 19.2% to 18.8%).
And considering we all know that femlets aren't exactly loyal to manlets & with the increase in hypergamy...yeah I think we all know what is bound to come of this in the future. :forcedsmile::feelsbadman:

Ultimately, this just reflects how foids are increasing the overall dysgenic state of society; seemingly not caring for the actual quality of the product & rather on just having one. :blackpill:
 
Brutal. "Natural selection made us want tall men" my ass. Maybe women's height fetish is sexual selection too? that'd be funny
 
@Diddy @WorthlessSlavicShit @Lazyandtalentless @Friezacel @Koomersarj @wereq
 
I was 8.5 lbs as a newborn, so I was too big for my femlet mother to give birth to me the conventional way.
 
Obviously, the more time spent in the womb, the better the development, but this can only happen if the womb is large enough. Taller women can provide more space and time for their fetus to grow so they turn out better developed, especially in the brain. Unfortunately, we no longer allow foids with subhuman narrow pelvises and short womb spaces to die out from childbirth like in the past which produces dysgenic outcomes and also increases inequality in life outcomes.
 
Ultimately, this just reflects how foids are increasing the overall dysgenic state of society; seemingly not caring for the actual quality of the product & rather on just having one. :blackpill:
At this stage only a totalitarian eugenicist government brutally enforcing their control over foids bodies, as well as ensuring that only highly-looksmatched parings were allowed, can save the human species.
 
Most hapacels have to be born by c-section, guess why :forcedsmile:
 
Tfw "the height difference she deserves:foidSoy:" becomes the c-section she requires:feelshaha:.

Most hapacels have to be born by c-section, guess why :forcedsmile:
Really:feelswhere:? Wouldn't surprise me.

Brutal. "Natural selection made us want tall men" my ass. Maybe women's height fetish is sexual selection too? that'd be funny
 

Similar threads

Lazyandtalentless
Replies
1
Views
753
R(p)apist1488
R(p)apist1488
Lazyandtalentless
Replies
4
Views
419
lifeisfucked215
lifeisfucked215
Grodd
Replies
30
Views
1K
over_department
over_department

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top