Ive literally never met one, neither on the internet or RL. At most there are a few that reject the just world fallacy in an economic sense, but even these are overwhelmingly fewer than men.
Serious Have you ever met a woman who didnt believe in the just world fallacy
They've won at life by being born with a vagina. They can get away with so much shit and they're told since birth that they're a princess who deserves the best and has intrinsic value.
Also
Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning
Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.
Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.
They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.
Quotes:
Also
Winners in a rigged game will consider the game fair as long as they keep winning
Many people are prone to believing in the just-world fallacy—the notion that our victories and failures are just and the appropriate reward or punishment to our actions. People like to continue believing the world is fair even when they intellectually know that it is not.
Researchers tested people's predispositions to the just-world fallacy by having them engage in a rigged card game. The game was designed so that one player would have a clear advantage throughout the game that would essentially guarantee their victory. They found that although both players could recognize the game was imbalanced, the winner was consistently more likely to still believe the game was "fair" and that their victory was the result of their skill and merit.
They suggest this can help understand how people react to inequalities in life. Generally, in a rigged game, their findings show that those who "win" will have a greater tendency to ignore the legitimate complaints of those who lose.
Quotes:
- Winners were generally more likely to believe that the game was fair, even when the playing field was most heavily tilted in their favor.
- In short, it’s not just how the game is played, it’s also whether you win or lose.
- Molina M, Bucca M, Macy MW. 2019. It’s not just how the game is played, it’s whether you win or lose. Science Advances. 5(7): eaau1156. [FullText]
O shit.
This is actually a brilliant observation. I haven't either
This is actually a brilliant observation. I haven't either
R
I mean.... define "met", cause I never really talked to one.
Talked on discord, read posts made by women on reddit/4chan, etc
Have you ever seen bigfoot?
Foids believe in the fallacy to make themselves seen as morally superior and cope with the fact that their only value comes from their hole that simps worship.
Similar threads
Users who are viewing this thread
