Serious Haplogroup-maxxing...R1a vs. R1b... are foids descended from R1a more friendly to rice and vice versa?

[Dotrinfobe]

With my limited experience with foids real life, online, and escorts, it seems foids from countries where r1a is dominant is more friendly towards rice.

r1b foids are much more likely to be racist and hostile.

also, i suspect Scandinavian I1 haplogroup might also be more friendly to rice. I saw a youtube channel with a giga stacy Norwegian foid and she had a plain looking Indonesian ex-bf in Los Angles and everyone in the comment section was like "he gives off a bad vibe" (obviously hinting on his mismatched looks-level vs. the giga stacy) My own experience with Nordic foid escorts is that they seem to be more friendly and less racist towards rice, more docile, perhaps more inhib, but not overly hostile.

Not sure about middle eastern E and J haplogroup, though. hardly any interaction.

Also in my experience, Italian foids seem more likely to be friendly, even though Italy is r1b dominant, there might be significant non-r1b hablogroup, so it might make sense.

I wonder why... is it coz R1a and I1 foids are genetically more likely to find rice attractive and be more objective about the looks of rice, rather than outright deny the looks of rice no matter the looks level due to racism-bias?

Perhaps r1b branched off Indo-European much earlier, and they migrated westwards, mixed with native europeans who were inferior in intelligence, therefore nowadays people who are r1b dominant are more "tribal", more racist, more hostile against rice? wheras r1a groups are more intellectual and "enlightend" in some way and more open to rice? Is it just purely conincidence that countries that are r1b dominant tend to be much more racist and xenophobic? while r1a countries tend to be more open to non-native races?

 

[Lonelycel]

Well I'm not rice, I'm curry, but slavic foids on the whole are nicer to me than white foids, I can say that with certainty. However they're not romantically interested.

 

[Dotrinfobe]

Well I'm not rice, I'm curry, but slavic foids on the whole are nicer to me than white foids, I can say that with certainty. However they're not romantically interested.

being treated more humanely is always better than the opposite. the r1b white foids often are hostile, standoff-ish, and hostile af. racism in white coutries imo is probably overwelmingly r1b-trait, male and female.

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

With my limited experience with foids real life, online, and escorts, it seems foids from countries where r1a is dominant is more friendly towards rice.

r1b foids are much more likely to be racist and hostile.

also, i suspect Scandinavian I1 haplogroup might also be more friendly to rice. I saw a youtube channel with a giga stacy Norwegian foid and she had a plain looking Indonesian ex-bf in Los Angles and everyone in the comment section was like "he gives off a bad vibe" (obviously hinting on his mismatched looks-level vs. the giga stacy) My own experience with Nordic foid escorts is that they seem to be more friendly and less racist towards rice, more docile, perhaps more inhib, but not overly hostile.

Not sure about middle eastern E and J haplogroup, though. hardly any interaction.

Also in my experience, Italian foids seem more likely to be friendly, even though Italy is r1b dominant, there might be significant non-r1b hablogroup, so it might make sense.

I wonder why... is it coz R1a and I1 foids are genetically more likely to find rice attractive and be more objective about the looks of rice, rather than outright deny the looks of rice no matter the looks level due to racism-bias?

Perhaps r1b branched off Indo-European much earlier, and they migrated westwards, mixed with native europeans who were inferior in intelligence, therefore nowadays people who are r1b dominant are more "tribal", more racist, more hostile against rice? wheras r1a groups are more intellectual and "enlightend" in some way and more open to rice? Is it just purely conincidence that countries that are r1b dominant tend to be much more racist and xenophobic? while r1a countries tend to be more open to non-native races?

But those are Y-haplogroups, not mtDNA-haplogroups. Foids don't inherit that.

 

[solblue]

Where is your sig from?

 

[Lonelycel]

being treated more humanely is always better than the opposite. the r1b white foids often are hostile, standoff-ish, and hostile af. racism in white coutries imo is probably overwelmingly r1b-trait, male and female.

 

[Dotrinfobe]

But those are Y-haplogroups, not mtDNA-haplogroups. Foids don't inherit that.

yes i am aware. but foids do descend from fathers, speaking of the obvious, who would carry the y haplogroup.

in genetic testing, its often encourage for foids to get Y tested by testing their male relative, like father, uncle etc. so they know their Y haplogroup heritage.

Where is your sig from?

A Russian movie

 

[Ika-Sama]

yes i am aware. but foids do descend from fathers, speaking of the obvious, who would carry the y haplogroup.

in genetic testing, its often encourage for foids to get Y tested by testing their male relative, like father, uncle etc. so they know their Y haplogroup heritage.

I think Autosomal DNA is more reliable. And If their fathers Y-Dna played a part in personality, there would be multiple influences, because most people have a mixed variety of Haplogroups in their Dna. Not to mention the various Subclades of those Haplogroups.

 

[Emba]

Hapagroups are doomed

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

Hapagroups are doomed

@kanyepilled

 

[kanyepilled]

@kanyepilled

us mixed race people are the most oppressed group in the world

 

[TheDarkEnigma]

us mixed race people are the most oppressed group in the world

Agreed. We don't belong to any group and our parent races reject us, and no one wants to breed with a mongrel.

 

[starcrapoo]

Yea a country's Y-DNA haplogroup makeup says a lot about that nation because it reveals the different pre-history tribes that constitute the nation (and yes, for you coping white stormfrontcels, no nation today has one single y-DNA or mtDNA haplogroup marker, unless it is some isolated ethnic tribe, say the Sami in Finland, the various ethnic hill tribes of south western China, Andaman islanders, etc etc. where 99+ percent of people in that tribe all have the same y-DNA marker). These are historically isolated tribes with virtually no interaction with outsiders or very little, and have very little or no genetic admixture with any outside tribes.

Back to your original post, y-DNA R1a is a Slavic marker. Most slavic countries have a high frequency of r1a. And Slavics can be seen as Caucasians from the Eurasian region which is a vast open region with a rich history (good or bad) of interaction with other peoples in the region.

Whereas y-DNA R1b is a Western European marker of Europe and these tribes were often isolated not just from one another due to geographic barriers but also to the rest of the world. Therefore imo, making them feel more tribalistic and thus seemingly more racist. Obviously there are other factors at play as well. Every group is unique because of their geographical location, and of course there is a saying in anthro and history, that geography is destiny.

As for scandinavia, Sweden can be seen as the border between the Baltic-Uralic area where there is a relatively high presence of haplogroup N. And of course, y-DNA N is a Uralic Eurasian marker. So Sweden (and FInland's) presence of I1 and N makes them unique to other Europeans in that sense. They're not western Europeans (y-DNA R1b) and they are closer to the Baltic Eurasian region.

These genetic difference border areas are often zones of conflict though, that is the downside, the upside is that any interaction is better than no interaction. So these people in the end, can be viewed as seemingly more worldly in the modern day, and most of the time that is often the case. Whereas western European interaction with the world is a fairly recent phenomenon often involving complete dominance and displacement of ethnic subhumans .

 

[suigin]

haplogroups me

 

[Languishingrn]

Agreed. We don't belong to any group and our parent races reject us, and no one wants to breed with a mongrel.

Reading Er's book made me realize that. I2 yugoslav checking in

 

[Dotrinfobe]

Yea a country's Y-DNA haplogroup makeup says a lot about that nation because it reveals the different pre-history tribes that constitute the nation (and yes, for you coping white stormfrontcels, no nation today has one single y-DNA or mtDNA haplogroup marker, unless it is some isolated ethnic tribe, say the Sami in Finland, the various ethnic hill tribes of south western China, Andaman islanders, etc etc. where 99+ percent of people in that tribe all have the same y-DNA marker). These are historically isolated tribes with virtually no interaction with outsiders or very little, and have very little or no genetic admixture with any outside tribes.

Back to your original post, y-DNA R1a is a Slavic marker. Most slavic countries have a high frequency of r1a. And Slavics can be seen as Caucasians from the Eurasian region which is a vast open region with a rich history of interaction with other peoples in the region.

Whereas y-DNA R1b is a Western European marker of Europe and these tribes were often isolated not just from one another due to geographic barriers but also to the rest of the world. Therefore imo, making them feel more tribalistic and thus seemingly more racist. Obviously there are other factors at play as well. Every group is unique because of their geographical location, and of course there is a saying in anthro and history, that geography is destiny.

As for scandinavia, Sweden can be seen as the border between the Baltic-Uralic area where there is a relatively high presence of haplogroup N. And of course, y-DNA N is a Uralic Eurasian marker. So Sweden (and FInland's) presence of I1 and N makes them unique to other Europeans in that sense. They're not western Europeans (y-DNA R1b) and they are closer to the Baltic Eurasian region.

your 1st paragraph gives me a very strong deja vu feeling. did you post that before?

as for r1b, it doesnt seem exclusively western european. Tocharians were in china and they were r1b. and modern day Armenia or some other country also is r1b.

 

[starcrapoo]

your 1st paragraph gives me a very strong deja vu feeling. did you post that before?

as for r1b, it doesnt seem exclusively western european. Tocharians were in china and they were r1b. and modern day Armenia or some other country also is r1b.

Yea i've posted about haplogroups before concerning y-DNA haplogroup N in Finland.

That wouldn't surprise me, when I studied anthro I didn't read as much about Europe but as I understood it, y-DNA R1 in general was a Eurasian steppe marker (proto-Indo European imo, north of the Caucasus mountains) before it spread in different directions polarizing into different subclades (tribes & languages). Much like the way y-DNA haplogroup 03 of East Asia is spread all throughout but the different subclades of y-DNA 03 indicate different languages and different tribes, example, y-DNA O2b = Korean marker, y-DNA O2b1 = Japanese marker)

I think the ISCC has updated the nomenclature already as they keep doing but you get the picture.