Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion halo effect rooted in mythology

ChinaCurry

ChinaCurry

Banned
-
Joined
Jan 15, 2019
Posts
5,685
if we look at the pre amharic religions/mythology, we can see that the projections and depictions basically seem to align totally to the world modern foids see around them.

what's funny though here is that because these are mythologies /religion they all have to basically tell the same story, hence it's a fair comparison.

1. Norse - best phenotype today, their main mythological characters display dark triad traits, are masculine / feminine features, and both good and bad guys are highly dominant, truly gods rather than men. even the non human depictions like the world serpent, are alpha af and cool af.

Greek- basically same, but everything turned down a notch, including height, jaw, muscle mass, and dark triad. aligns to real world, stacies will happily fuck off to Ayia Napa and get fucked by unemployed illiterate Stavros, but would always prefer to capture and lockdown Aleksander or Frederik if they can.

Curry/rice - then you look at Ramayana or Shan Hai Ching, again same shit, princes, nobles, warriors, love, giants, mythical animals and dragons. All the heroic humans and gods are depicted as either skinny, fat, or normally skinny fat, basic people, some of the curries are even blue. the women are decidedly average, and the mythical creatures arent even going to scare a baby into eating drinking his milk, and in many cases just look like stupid comedy characters, even when they are supposed to be doing some epic shit.

starting from a blueprint like this has led to the halo we see in modern society and media. having a tattoo of Thor or Odin or Zeus or Apollo is going to be seen favourably by men and women, just try having a tattoo of Hanuman or Laxman or Jiachong or Niwa and see what reaction you get (hint, its vaginal dehumidifucation)
 
Last edited:
greeks are the biggest example imo
 
just try having a tattoo of Hanuman or Laxman or Jiachong or Niwa and see what reaction you get (hint, its vaginal dehumidifucation)
:lul::lul::lul:
based & high IQ thread :feelsokman:
 
if we look at the pre amharic religions/mythology, we can see that the projections and depictions basically seem to align totally to the world modern foids see around them.

what's funny though here is that because these are mythologies /religion they all have to basically tell the same story, hence it's a fair comparison.

1. Norse - best phenotype today, their main mythological characters display dark triad traits, are masculine / feminine features, and both good and bad guys are highly dominant, truly gods rather than men. even the non human depictions like the world serpent, are alpha af and cool af.

Greek- basically same, but everything turned down a notch, including height, jaw, muscle mass, and dark triad. aligns to real world, stacies will happily fuck off to Ayia Napa and get fucked by unemployed illiterate Stavros, but would always prefer to capture and lockdown Aleksander or Frederik if they can.

Curry/rice - then you look at Ramayana or Shan Hai Ching, again same shit, princes, nobles, warriors, love, giants, mythical animals and dragons. All the heroic humans and gods are depicted as either skinny, fat, or normally skinny fat, basic people, some of the curries are even blue. the women are decidedly average, and the mythical creatures arent even going to scare a baby into eating drinking his milk, and in many cases just look like stupid comedy characters, even when they are supposed to be doing some epic shit.

starting from a blueprint like this has led to the halo we see in modern society and media. having a tattoo of Thor or Odin or Zeus or Apollo is going to be seen favourably by men and women, just try having a tattoo of Hanuman or Laxman or Jiachong or Niwa and see what reaction you get (hint, its vaginal dehumidifucation)

Jupiter level IQ
 
greeks are the biggest example imo
how so? You mean the sculptures portraying the greek gods and heros huh? That's kinda funny because in real life, greeks are quite ugly by west europeans standards
Greek- basically same, but everything turned down a notch, including height, jaw, muscle mass, and dark triad. aligns to real world, stacies will happily fuck off to Ayia Napa and get fucked by unemployed illiterate Stavros, but would always prefer to capture and lockdown Aleksander or Frederik if they can.
If foids knew how the average greek man looked like they would go frederik or bust. Many depictions of the greek phenotype are quite off, it really isnt gl at all. Sure beats deathnics like curries but nords mog us to oblivion pheno wise
 
Last edited:
how so? You mean the sculptures portraying the greek gods and heros huh? That's kinda funny because in real life, greeks are quite ugly by west europeans standards

If foids knew how the average greek man looked like they would go frederik or bust. Many depictions of the greek phenotype are quite off, it really isnt gl at all. Sure beats deathnics like curries but nords mog us to oblivion pheno wise
agree average Greek is nowhere near as good as average nordic, but Greeks who get the right mix of med features, with diet and lifestyle do look good. they are more like curries and arabs than nordics and Germanic, ie a very high ceiling cos they can get exoticness right, but the average is nothing great, unlike nordics.

point is Greek mythology symbols look good, not as good as Norse, and Mediterranean are good looking when their shit comes together.

for curries and rices it's been over for 10k years based on my theory
 
point is Greek mythology symbols look good, not as good as Norse, and Mediterranean are good looking when their shit comes together.
My point is that ancient greeks were frauding their phenos with their depictions. Norse people werent so far off their depictions as greeks were from their sculptures. They depicted the minority of greeks that look exotic without looking subhuman to gain looks halo, but ofc what they didnt mention is that its extremely rare for a greek to look like that and was a notable exception when that happened, whereas it isnt so improbable to find norse people who resembled a lot their depictions
 
how so? You mean the sculptures portraying the greek gods and heros huh? That's kinda funny because in real life, greeks are quite ugly by west europeans standards
Yes I meant the sculptures lol not the actual people
 
My point is that ancient greeks were frauding their phenos with their depictions. Norse people werent so far off their depictions as greeks were from their sculptures. They depicted the minority of greeks that look exotic without looking subhuman to gain looks halo, but ofc what they didnt mention is that its extremely rare for a greek to look like that and was a notable exception when that happened, whereas it isnt so improbable to find norse people who resembled a lot their depictions
So tell me this, would Greek foids find a Nordic or Anglo trucel more attractive than a Mediterranean chad, because he's exotic?
Ok maybe not trucel, but is it like noodles where they would find a jbw 4/10 more attractive than a 6/10 Aryan or a 7/10 riceman? Would gyrowhores apply same logic because they want to have white kids like noodles do?
 
So tell me this, would Greek foids find a Nordic or Anglo trucel more attractive than a Mediterranean chad, because he's exotic?
Ok maybe not trucel, but is it like noodles where they would find a jbw 4/10 more attractive than a 6/10 Aryan or a 7/10 riceman? Would gyrowhores apply same logic because they want to have white kids like noodles do?
Yes, greek foids lust over aryan chads, not as much as noodles tho. In gyroland, there are quite a few guys that look west european and they are the most sought after on average, whereas guys with traditional greek pheno need to have chad tier bone structure and height to compete with an average west euro looking guy. In the case of truecel bone structure and/or height, the guy who is average wins regardless of pheno in most cases.
 
if we look at the pre amharic religions/mythology, we can see that the projections and depictions basically seem to align totally to the world modern foids see around them.

what's funny though here is that because these are mythologies /religion they all have to basically tell the same story, hence it's a fair comparison.

1. Norse - best phenotype today, their main mythological characters display dark triad traits, are masculine / feminine features, and both good and bad guys are highly dominant, truly gods rather than men. even the non human depictions like the world serpent, are alpha af and cool af.

Greek- basically same, but everything turned down a notch, including height, jaw, muscle mass, and dark triad. aligns to real world, stacies will happily fuck off to Ayia Napa and get fucked by unemployed illiterate Stavros, but would always prefer to capture and lockdown Aleksander or Frederik if they can.

Curry/rice - then you look at Ramayana or Shan Hai Ching, again same shit, princes, nobles, warriors, love, giants, mythical animals and dragons. All the heroic humans and gods are depicted as either skinny, fat, or normally skinny fat, basic people, some of the curries are even blue. the women are decidedly average, and the mythical creatures arent even going to scare a baby into eating drinking his milk, and in many cases just look like stupid comedy characters, even when they are supposed to be doing some epic shit.

starting from a blueprint like this has led to the halo we see in modern society and media. having a tattoo of Thor or Odin or Zeus or Apollo is going to be seen favourably by men and women, just try having a tattoo of Hanuman or Laxman or Jiachong or Niwa and see what reaction you get (hint, its vaginal dehumidifucation)

This thread is pretty good, makes sense when you think about it
 
Interesting thread,i agree.
I have been really obsessed with norse mythology and culture as of lately and they really do have the ideal pheno
 
This thread is pretty good, makes sense when you think about it
Thanks, my first thread back after a ban.
Btw here are some illustrations of what I'm trying to say
Adam wesierski odin final flat


Vs

DISCOURSE 1

Jiaochong
 

:feelskek:

Another thing too is hat the lore of the Norse Gods and the "religion" around these Gods is more "masculine", you have to die in battle holding your weapon to get into heaven, someone killing you in your sleep without your weapon next to you is something to be feared, you literally go to hell for not dying a warriors death (with small exceptions)

That kind of religion is going to breed a strong people, only the best of the best will survive to breed
 
:feelskek:

Another thing too is hat the lore of the Norse Gods and the "religion" around these Gods is more "masculine", you have to die in battle holding your weapon to get into heaven, someone killing you in your sleep without your weapon next to you is something to be feared, you literally go to hell for not dying a warriors death (with small exceptions)

That kind of religion is going to breed a strong people, only the best of the best will survive to breed
Also the high latitude, this is a proven indicator of genetic quality. To survive in those latitudes u need to have much harder spirit, be physically higher quality, optimise and innovate like fuck, and optimise the hell out of your diet.
There isn't the option like ricemen and curries have of mass farming useless crap like rice and wheat to maintain energy levels to just exist for 50 years (when your crap genes give in and you die), hence there aren't the food type copes than rices and curries have, which have become fat worse post Instagram
 

Similar threads

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top