Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

JFL Hahahaha. This legit 2/10 ugly twink got a mid looking Becky as a wife

57801.jpg
 
He is pretty tall so that makes up for his other flaws
 
Actually she is a 4 now looking at her in other shots, but still this is insane. Who hurt her? Lol.
 
If your world view is shattered by a single counter example you are a simpleton
 
Last edited:
Haha. So you can't theorise for this one occasion?
Sure you can. But if you couldn't find any reason it would make no difference to the overall picture. And no one is theorizing, people are guessing randomly with 0 evidence or effort invested and they are using this single event, which is just as meaningless as a piece of evidence for the overall female preferance as it is meaningless as a piece of evidence against it, to keep their everlasting argument about height vs race vs face vs NT alive.
 
She looks ethnic so she is just using his western status.
 
There's three things in LMS. Looks, money, status. Being a well-known, if in a somewhat niche environment, Youtuber gave this dude enough of the latter two to compensate for shit looks enough to marry a chick that's slightly (as you yourself have admitted) better looking than him. Plus, if the dude is as tall as the others are saying, then even his looks aren't so bad overall.

It's the same reason why obese Western boomers get laid with young, skinny, good-looking women in Eastern Europe, South-East Asia, Latin America and so on. Money and status, even though the delusional ethnics here would have you believe that those young women are actually sexually attracted to those men because "muh JBW is law:soy::soy::soy:":feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::lul::lul::lul::lul:.

Being NT is easy.
Tell that to the autists and schizophrenics who struggle with simple social interactions their entire lives no matter how much they try, because they are simply wired different, and as a result have a pathetic rate of marrying and having children.

750px-Fertility_Ratios.png



If your world view is shattered by a single counter example you are a simpleton
Good point, but as I said, this isn't really even much of a counter example, it's just money and especially status carrying this dude.
 
Good point, but as I said, this isn't really even much of a counter example, it's just money and especially status carrying this dude.
Sure, but out there are ugly men loved by women for things unrelated to all there parts of LMS.

They might be the exception, and with how narrow the female trait distribution is they are maybe a fairly rare type of exception, but they do exist. If IT or whomever brings up one of those type of men, it shouldn't affect us much. Because we shouldn't be making absolute claims, but observations about strong trends across large samples / entire populations. When you observe something in thousands or millions of people, a single additional data point is irrelevant (most of the time).

Think there is a bit of a holyness spiral going on here, where being highly pessimistic and expressing blackpilled ideas strongly and with certainty are seen as good things in and of themselves, leading to a feedback loop spiraling into complete absurdity. "No woman would ever do X" is only reasonable as an overstatement amongst the ingroup, a concious lowering of epsiteomological standards amongst likeminded people, like dressing more casually around friends.

But I suspect people post single outlier examples so much because they really are emotionally affected by them, and also made to doubt the validity of their precious believes because of them. Frequent use of these outliers as "evidence" for someone's position on face vs height and so on happens for the same reason, I would guess.

I'm not saying this to be pedantic, I'm making a point so more insecure members with a tendency towards black/white thinking realize they can spare themselves all the emotional tourmoil connected with doubting everything you thought you knew again and again and again everytime you see an ugly dude who's not rich or famous with a girl.

Also, this kind of talk makes us look stupid. Which we / some of us might be, but no reason to show it this openly.
 
Last edited:
There's three things in LMS. Looks, money, status. Being a well-known, if in a somewhat niche environment, Youtuber gave this dude enough of the latter two to compensate for shit looks enough to marry a chick that's slightly (as you yourself have admitted) better looking than him. Plus, if the dude is as tall as the others are saying, then even his looks aren't so bad overall.

It's the same reason why obese Western boomers get laid with young, skinny, good-looking women in Eastern Europe, South-East Asia, Latin America and so on. Money and status, even though the delusional ethnics here would have you believe that those young women are actually sexually attracted to those men because "muh JBW is law:soy::soy::soy:":feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::feelskek::lul::lul::lul::lul:.


Tell that to the autists and schizophrenics who struggle with simple social interactions their entire lives no matter how much they try, because they are simply wired different, and as a result have a pathetic rate of marrying and having children.

750px-Fertility_Ratios.png



And thanks for providing a reasonable take on this.
 
She will obviously divorcerape him after she gets her nice passport while jumping from man to man living a life of leisure in the west after escaping from whatever shithole the whore came from, slit her throat she's just a drain on my tax money.
 
Sure, but out there are ugly men loved by women for things unrelated to all there parts of LMS.

They might be the exception, and with how narrow the female trait distribution is they are maybe a fairly rare type of exception, but they do exist. If IT or whomever brings up one of those type of men, it shouldn't affect us much. Because we shouldn't be making absolute claims, but observations about strong trends across large samples / entire populations. When you observe something in thousands or millions of people, a single additional data point is irrelevant (most of the time).

Think there is a bit of a holyness spiral going on here, where being highly pessimistic and expressing blackpilled ideas strongly and with certainty are seen as good things in and of themselves, leading to a feedback loop spiraling into complete absurdity. "No woman would ever do X" is only reasonable as an overstatement amongst the ingroup, a concious lowering of epsiteomological standards amongst likeminded people, like dressing more casually around friends.

But I suspect people post single outlier examples so much because they really are emotionally affected by them, and also made to worry about the validity of their precious believes because of them. Frequent use of these outliers as "evidence" for someone's position on face vs height and so on happens for the same reason, I would guess.

I'm not saying this to be pedantic, I'm making a point so more insecure members with a tendency towards black/white thinking realize they can spare themselves all the emotional tourmoil connected with doubting everything you thought you knew again and again and again everytime they see an ugly dude who's not rich or famous with a girl.

Also, this kind of talk makes us look stupid. Which we / some of us might be, but no reason to show it this openly.
:yes::yes::yes:

And thanks for providing a reasonable take on this.
Thanks, you also provided great takes as usual.
 
Also, this kind of talk makes us look stupid. Which we / some of us might be, but no reason to show it this openly.

Me posing this question doesn't make me look stupid.

It makes me look inquisitive, as far as I'm concerned as that's what I am being, but thanks for your projection. Dickface.
 
Me posing this question doesn't make me look stupid.

It makes me look inquisitive, as far as I'm concerned as that's what I am being, but thanks for your projection. Dickface.
I have yet to address you directly. You are taking the general statement
If your world view is shattered by a single counter example you are a simpleton
and making it about yourself. I don't mind wondering about what caused an obvious outlier event, it's the natural and sensible reaction to have. But using this to make a larger, overarching point about female preferences in general is silly, unless this is just used to examplify something already indicated by other, more meaningful data.
 
Me posing this question doesn't make me look stupid.

It makes me look inquisitive, as far as I'm concerned as that's what I am being, but thanks for your projection. Dickface.
I have yet to address you directly. You are taking the general statement

and making it about yourself. I don't mind wondering about what caused an obvious outlier event, it's the natural and sensible reaction to have. But using this to make a larger, overarching point about female preferences in general is silly, unless this is just used to examplify something already indicated by other, more meaningful data.

To make it more clear:

Speculating "his youtube fame and money and status as a first worlder probably led to him scoring someone this attractive" is completly reasonable. Same with "his height helped him out".

Coming to the conclusion that "this just shows face doesn't matter if you have the height" is stupid. Just as "see, whites can't be incel" would be stupid. These kind of conclusions based on one exception are basically what an outsider might use to "disprove" our arguments. "Here, see, there is an ugly guy with a girl, so how could the blackpill be true?".
 
The wife has epilepsy, nursemaxxing at its peak
 

Similar threads

Darth Aquarius
Replies
5
Views
559
Darth Aquarius
Darth Aquarius
tandoorichickencel
Replies
9
Views
724
5ft4ropeconnoisseur
5ft4ropeconnoisseur
UnchargedSamsung
Replies
1
Views
163
Sir Silentium
Sir Silentium
DarkStar
Replies
13
Views
699
DarkStar
DarkStar

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top