
BeatingInceldom
Banned
-
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2023
- Posts
- 222
He is pretty tall so that makes up for his other flaws
Is he NT by any chance?
status saved him
Come on now.
If your world view is shattered by a single counter example you are a simpleton
t.How does that help her? Explain it to me.
"wow you're such a gentle soul for marrying him" jfl i hate foids so much kick em allHow does that help her? Explain it to me.
That's like saying "being tall is easy." You get what you get.Being NT is easy.
Sure you can. But if you couldn't find any reason it would make no difference to the overall picture. And no one is theorizing, people are guessing randomly with 0 evidence or effort invested and they are using this single event, which is just as meaningless as a piece of evidence for the overall female preferance as it is meaningless as a piece of evidence against it, to keep their everlasting argument about height vs race vs face vs NT alive.Haha. So you can't theorise for this one occasion?
Some people said 6'3 but I'm not sureHow tall? I get that, but how is a 4-5 with him? That's crazy. What does she get from this?
Tell that to the autists and schizophrenics who struggle with simple social interactions their entire lives no matter how much they try, because they are simply wired different, and as a result have a pathetic rate of marrying and having children.Being NT is easy.
Good point, but as I said, this isn't really even much of a counter example, it's just money and especially status carrying this dude.If your world view is shattered by a single counter example you are a simpleton
Sure, but out there are ugly men loved by women for things unrelated to all there parts of LMS.Good point, but as I said, this isn't really even much of a counter example, it's just money and especially status carrying this dude.
There's three things in LMS. Looks, money, status. Being a well-known, if in a somewhat niche environment, Youtuber gave this dude enough of the latter two to compensate for shit looks enough to marry a chick that's slightly (as you yourself have admitted) better looking than him. Plus, if the dude is as tall as the others are saying, then even his looks aren't so bad overall.
It's the same reason why obese Western boomers get laid with young, skinny, good-looking women in Eastern Europe, South-East Asia, Latin America and so on. Money and status, even though the delusional ethnics here would have you believe that those young women are actually sexually attracted to those men because "muh JBW is law"
.
Tell that to the autists and schizophrenics who struggle with simple social interactions their entire lives no matter how much they try, because they are simply wired different, and as a result have a pathetic rate of marrying and having children.
![]()
![]()
Autistic and schizophrenic males have fertility rates of around 20% of normal males, with their brothers also having fewer children.
View: https://www.reddit.com/r/BlackPillScience/comments/15n0brl/autism_blackpill_autistic_male_fertility_rate_of/ Not exactly a new study, it's even on the scientific blackpill page on incels.wiki with an entire graph summarizing the results, but it's always good to bring this up in case...incels.is
Sure, but out there are ugly men loved by women for things unrelated to all there parts of LMS.
They might be the exception, and with how narrow the female trait distribution is they are maybe a fairly rare type of exception, but they do exist. If IT or whomever brings up one of those type of men, it shouldn't affect us much. Because we shouldn't be making absolute claims, but observations about strong trends across large samples / entire populations. When you observe something in thousands or millions of people, a single additional data point is irrelevant (most of the time).
Think there is a bit of a holyness spiral going on here, where being highly pessimistic and expressing blackpilled ideas strongly and with certainty are seen as good things in and of themselves, leading to a feedback loop spiraling into complete absurdity. "No woman would ever do X" is only reasonable as an overstatement amongst the ingroup, a concious lowering of epsiteomological standards amongst likeminded people, like dressing more casually around friends.
But I suspect people post single outlier examples so much because they really are emotionally affected by them, and also made to worry about the validity of their precious believes because of them. Frequent use of these outliers as "evidence" for someone's position on face vs height and so on happens for the same reason, I would guess.
I'm not saying this to be pedantic, I'm making a point so more insecure members with a tendency towards black/white thinking realize they can spare themselves all the emotional tourmoil connected with doubting everything you thought you knew again and again and again everytime they see an ugly dude who's not rich or famous with a girl.
Also, this kind of talk makes us look stupid. Which we / some of us might be, but no reason to show it this openly.
Thanks, you also provided great takes as usual.And thanks for providing a reasonable take on this.
Also, this kind of talk makes us look stupid. Which we / some of us might be, but no reason to show it this openly.
I have yet to address you directly. You are taking the general statementMe posing this question doesn't make me look stupid.
It makes me look inquisitive, as far as I'm concerned as that's what I am being, but thanks for your projection. Dickface.
and making it about yourself. I don't mind wondering about what caused an obvious outlier event, it's the natural and sensible reaction to have. But using this to make a larger, overarching point about female preferences in general is silly, unless this is just used to examplify something already indicated by other, more meaningful data.If your world view is shattered by a single counter example you are a simpleton
Me posing this question doesn't make me look stupid.
It makes me look inquisitive, as far as I'm concerned as that's what I am being, but thanks for your projection. Dickface.
I have yet to address you directly. You are taking the general statement
and making it about yourself. I don't mind wondering about what caused an obvious outlier event, it's the natural and sensible reaction to have. But using this to make a larger, overarching point about female preferences in general is silly, unless this is just used to examplify something already indicated by other, more meaningful data.
Glad he found somebodyHow does that help her? Explain it to me.