Blackpill Gurkhas vs Vikings a classic example of lookism

[currymuncher007]

I mean yeah, vikings were pretty strong and shit, tall, muscular, blue eyes, blond hair and shitee, but why doesn't holywood potray gurkhas in the same way? There are countless incidences where one gurkha soldier has slaughtered his way out of 30-50 abduls. Why? IT IS ALL ABOUT LOOKS. Gurkhas are short and deadly soldiers, but they are not the chads that women want, they are not sexualized in the same way viking men have been sexualized another reason why being good at certain skill doesn't automatically pull foids towards you. It's over for chinks. And they're Hindu on top of that so it's super overr

 

[TedKacynski271828]

wtf is a gurkha

 

[AutistSupremacist]

wtf is a gurkha

Soldiers from Nepal during the colonial era

 

[Aegon Targaryen]

Churka vs Vikings. Who mogs more.

 

[currymuncher007]

wtf is a gurkha

a warrior from a specific nepali clan, IDK about deep details, but they are cold blooded killers

 

[currymuncher007]

Soldiers from Nepal during the colonial era

they serve in the british and Indian army till this day. There are many instances where one gurkha soldier has slaughtered his way out of countless men

 

[bruhwtf]

vikings will rip their dicks off

 

[nightbane]

a warrior from a specific nepali clan, IDK about deep details, but they are cold blooded killers

Lmao a jeet is anything but a cold blooded killer. A street shitter perhaps.

 

[currymuncher007]

Lmao a jeet is anything but a cold blooded killer. A street shitter perhaps.

cope. Gurkhas are the most feared battalion

 

[WorthlessSlavicShit]

Lookism likely plays a part, but there's also exposure playing a role here tbh. Vikings have left their mark on basically every country in Europe and have had a millenium for their legend to grow. Meanwhile, Gurkhas are mostly only know in their immediate region and have only had 1/10th of the time Vikings had for their reputation to grow and become well-known. While Gurkhas did serve for what was the biggest empire in history, the British Empire, they never dominated it and weren't even well-known across it, while the Vikings did frequently raid Britain before it became an empire and dominated large portions of it, were the first Europeans to reach the Americas, and are traditionally believed to have created and ruled the first Russian state. Those things give them a role in the history of the empire which employed the Gurkhas, as well as at least something of a role in the histories of the US and Russia, which are two of the very strongets countries in the world.

 

[currymuncher007]

vikings will rip their dicks off

not in modern combat.

 

[bruhwtf]

not in modern combat.

but in a fair melee battle they do

 

[currymuncher007]

but in a fair melee battle they do

obviously, a viking can rip a gurkha off in two in a fair melee. but in modern combat with guns and knives, no one beats gurkhas, not even Navy seals

 

[currymuncher007]

Lookism likely plays a part, but there's also exposure playing a role here tbh. Vikings have left their mark on basically every country in Europe and have had a millenium for their legend to grow. Meanwhile, Gurkhas are mostly only know in their immediate region and have only had 1/10th of the time Vikings had for their reputation to grow and become well-known. While Gurkhas did serve for what was the biggest empire in history, the British Empire, they never dominated it and weren't even well-known across it, while the Vikings did frequently raid Britain before it became an empire and dominated large portions of it, were the first Europeans to reach the Americas, and are traditionally believed to have created and ruled the first Russian state. Those things give them a role in the history of the empire which employed the Gurkhas, as well as at least something of a role in the histories of the US and Russia, which are two of the very strongets countries in the world.

makes sense. thanks

 

[weaselbomber]

Lookism likely plays a part, but there's also exposure playing a role here tbh. Vikings have left their mark on basically every country in Europe and have had a millenium for their legend to grow.

Yeah, it's as simple as that, really. Not surprising that Westerners write stuff we grew up learning and knowing about, instead of something more obscure from a far away culture. I don't see Nips making anime about ancient Rome, even if they love the Sengoku period.

 

[weaselbomber]

Churka vs Vikings. Who mogs more.

considering the fact that viking trade routes reached all the way into the caucasus (and a bit beyond), we prolly have seen this matchup irl

 

[Jud Pottah]

vikings will rip their dicks off

Kamikaze suicide Mitsubishi MOGGS Them All.

 

[DarkStar]

Well, Lookism does likely play a role.

Vikings are always portrayed physically as the White ideal: Nordic-pheno(robust face, tall, blonder hair+blue eyed) as well as the fact Gurkhas are literal Rice+Curry mixes, which by racepill logic is basically the most undesirable mix possible.

I don't deny that Gurkhas were brave warriors, but Vikings did more than just "muh rape n pillage" they were quite skilled navigators who literally found America before Columbus. They also impacted the Western world a lot culturally- for example "Earl" comes from the world Jarl which is Norse. I also am mostly NW European in ancestry, so I ofc want to see stuff which I have a "connection" with to some degree.

Lookism likely plays a part, but there's also exposure playing a role here tbh. Vikings have left their mark on basically every country in Europe and have had a millenium for their legend to grow. Meanwhile, Gurkhas are mostly only know in their immediate region and have only had 1/10th of the time Vikings had for their reputation to grow and become well-known. While Gurkhas did serve for what was the biggest empire in history, the British Empire, they never dominated it and weren't even well-known across it, while the Vikings did frequently raid Britain before it became an empire and dominated large portions of it, were the first Europeans to reach the Americas, and are traditionally believed to have created and ruled the first Russian state. Those things give them a role in the history of the empire which employed the Gurkhas, as well as at least something of a role in the histories of the US and Russia, which are two of the very strongets countries in the world.

Basically this

The thinking of OP in this regard -chalking it up to looksim- is just pure solipsism and neglects nuance.

Gurkhas also simply were just warriors, whereas Vikings had seafaring achievements to add on and culturally shaped a lot of Europe. I mean heck, the Normans who changed Britain forever in 1066 were descended of Vikings.

He also neglected the fact that Western media is soy nowadays, and often tries to be "woke" about history by replacing White characters with non-white ones. Whereas Curry media, whilst somewhat White-worshiping(choosing the most "White passing" who usually look Sand) Curries of the lot.

 

[The Scarlet Prince]

Curry delusions