Blackpill Great Looks is Still Not Enough for Men. Thugpill

[Deleted member 5861]

When we strained our subjects’ attentional capacities, we found exactly what I had suspected several decades before: Men overestimated the number of beautiful women (though their estimates of handsome men were unaffected). Female subjects also overestimated the frequency of gorgeous women in the rapidly presented crowds, but they did not overestimate the frequency of handsome men. The whole body of findings points to a simple conclusion about beautiful women: They capture everyone’s attention and monopolize downstream cognitive processes. The conclusion about handsome men is different: They grab women’s eyes but do not hold their minds; good-looking guys quickly get washed out of the stream of mental processing.

EVERYONE believes women are gorgeous, but men simply aren't aesthetic enough to truly capture anyone's mind for an extended period of time quite like a pretty woman. Men are sexually and aesthetically inferior.

In our first study, [we] asked people to judge an average-looking woman after being exposed to one of two series of other women. Half the participants judged the target woman after seeing a series of unusually beautiful women; the other half judged her after seeing a series of average-looking women. As in the case of exposure to extremes of water temperature, exposure to extremes of physical appearance affected people’s judgments of what was average. As we had predicted, an average-looking woman was judged significantly uglier than normal if the subjects had just been gazing at a series of beauties.

SMV is all relative, so having an "improved" global gene stock isn't going to solve inceldom. Because of this, even a 7/10 man will be incel if every other guy is 10/10.

Subjects in the control group first judged the artistic merit of abstract paintings such as Josef Albers’s Homage to the Square. The men in the experimental group saw centerfolds from Playboyand Penthouse; the women saw handsome naked men from Playgirl. After they had looked at either paintings or centerfolds, we asked our participants to rate their feelings about their current relationship partners. Again, there was a cover story — that psychologists were divided on whether being in a relationship opened people up to new aesthetic experiences or made them less open to novelty. To test which side was right, we told them, we needed to know about the extent to which their reported level of commitment depended on whether they had seen centerfolds.​

Once again, the results displayed a curious gender difference:​

​

Men who had viewed the centerfolds rated themselves as less in love with their partners; women’s judgments of their partners were not so easily swayed.​

...But lest we’re too quick to assume men are the only ones who conform to the worst of their gender’s stereotypes, women didn’t fare much better when the experiment was repeated with power rather than beauty as the variable:

Seeing a series of socially dominant men undermined women’s commitment, just as seeing attractive women had done to men’s.

Socially dominant behavior does most certainly make men more attractive to women. Just picture this: a woman eating out a used porta potty would repulse you, right? Well women feel the same way when a man acts beta. They want to throw up. In the bright side, being visually mogged isn't the end of the world for a man, at least as much as it is for females when chad sees a prettier woman, as long as status mogging isn't a problem.

o men value physical attractiveness in a mate more than women? Scientists in numerous disciplines believe that they do, but recent research using speed-dating paradigms suggests that males and females are equally influenced by physical attractiveness when choosing potential mates. Nevertheless, the premise of the current work is that sex differences in the importance of physical attractiveness are most likely to emerge in research on long-term relationships. Accordingly, the current work drew from 4 independent, longitudinal studies to examine sex differences in the implications of partner physical attractiveness for trajectories of marital satisfaction. In all 4 studies, both partners’ physical attractiveness was objectively rated at baseline, and both partners reported their marital satisfaction up to 8 times over the first 4 years of marriage. Whereas husbands were more satisfied at the beginning of the marriage and remained more satisfied over the next 4 years to the extent that they had an attractive wife, wives were no more or less satisfied initially or over the next 4 years to the extent that they had an attractive husband. Most importantly, a direct test indicated that partner physical attractiveness played a larger role in predicting husbands’ satisfaction than predicting wives’ satisfaction. These findings strengthen support for the idea that sex differences in self-reported preferences for physical attractiveness do have implications for long-term relationship outcomes.

Being good looking as a man is vital in order to be able to even enter a relationship, but you need an "exciting personality" (social dominance and status) in order to simply keep her. Meanwhile a woman just needs to not be landwhale and use make up efficiently and the man is completely happy with her. Women are hard pressed to be satisfied because men are just not as sexy.

The emotion control center of the brain, the amygdala, shows significantly higher levels of activation in males viewing sexual visual stimuli than females viewing the same images, according to a Center for Behavioral Neuroscience study led by Emory University psychologists Stephan Hamann and Kim Wallen. The finding, which appears in the April edition of “Nature Neuroscience,” demonstrates how men and women process visual sexual stimuli differently, and it may explain gender variations in reproductive behavior. […]
The fMRI scans revealed significantly higher levels of activation in the amygdala, which controls emotion and motivation, in the brains of the male subjects compared to the females, despite the fact that both males and females expressed similar subjective assessments of their levels of arousal after viewing the images.

Hamann and Wallen had a separate group pre-select the images to ensure they would be equally arousing to both males and females.
“If males and females found the pictures equally arousing, you would assume they would have similar patterns of brain activation,” said Hamann. “But we discovered the male brain seems to process visual sexual cues differently.”
The scientists’ discovery also is consistent with an evolutionary theory that natural selection spurred the development of different sexual behaviors in males and females.

“There is an advantage for males in quickly recognizing and responding to receptive females through visual cues,” explains Hamann. “This allows them to maximize their mating opportunities, which increases their chances for passing on their genes.”

Nothing more accurate in judging sexual desire than an MRI looking right at their brain. Women just do not respond to a sexy man to the same degree that a man get horny from a sexy woman. Women are far less horny than men.


TLDR: Women are not as horny, especially visually, as men. Males are also objectively not as sexually appealing as women, according to everyone. Because of this, men need to compensate by being socially dominant or by having higher status. That doesn't mean that being decent/good looking is not a requirement for a relationship, it most certainly is for a man, it just means that the man ALSO needs to be high status or socially dominant if he wants the attention to last. Its over for betas.

Sources: https://www.brainpickings.org/2013/07/03/kenrick-beauty/
https://meinnaturwissenschaftsblog.blogspot.com/2014/07/sex-differences-in-implications-of.html
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/03/040316072953.htm

 

[deadman123]

How long did it take you to write and compile all this data op?

 

[Deleted member 5861]

How long did it take you to write and compile all this data op?

Around 2 hours

 

[NEETAndTidy]

A man needs looks+status+height+personality+money+large social circle to be what a woman wants ideally.

The system is rigged

 

[mylifeistrash]

curious what the hell "socially dominate" means

 

[Frameceljeff]

curious what the hell "socially dominate" means

Not introverted more or less and not a pushover

 

[Deleted member 5861]

curious what the hell "socially dominate" means

Guess

 

[Izayacel]

Guess

Y its retarded,

 

[mylifeistrash]

Not introverted more or less and not a pushover

redundant as any tall good looking guy won't be a pushover or introverted

 

[Gyros_Pretcel]

Exactly. This whole "male toxicity" is basically evolutionary conditioned mating behavior and therefore unironically needs to die. It's time shitty apehumans grow up and ascend to the next level of existence.

 

[Captvic]

redundant as any tall good looking guy won't be a pushover or introverted

 

[Deleted member 5861]

redundant as any tall good looking guy won't be a pushover or introverted

That is true for the most part. That is why women like that type of appearance in a primal level to begin with, tall men aren't push overs.

 

[Deleted member 1252]

So basically I’d youre a man, you need good facial looks, height, frame, fitness, social dominance, and status.
If you’re a woman, you need a pulse.

JFL @ this joke of a species.
JFL @ this ridiculous mockery of an existence.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

So basically I’d youre a man, you need good facial looks, height, frame, fitness, social dominance, and status.
If you’re a woman, you need a pulse.

JFL @ this joke of a species.

I think that is actually the cases for most species actually. Like only one percent of elephant seal males get to mate while all the females who survive to reproduction age get to mate.

 

[Deleted member 1252]

I think that is actually the cases for most species actually. Like only one percent of elephant seal males get to mate while all the females who survive to reproduction age get to mate.

Yeah, true. Being a male animal of any species is basically losing from the beginning. Even if you’re chad it’s 1,000,000 times easier to be a female.

 

[Deleted member 5861]

-

 

[FiveFourManlet]

A man needs looks+status+height+personality+money+large social circle to be what a woman wants ideally.

The system is rigged

Cope

 

[NEETAndTidy]

Cope

I am with a nice bottle of moonshone!

 

[FiveFourManlet]

I am with a nice bottle of moonshone!

Pic with timestamp you better deliver as I rated you without doxx