Many times ive seen girls admit that they find most men physically/sexually unattractive. As a few of my female friends describe it, apparently they feel absolutely no desire to fuck most the men they come across, even if they are healthy, groomed, and in their age range. When confronted about their shallowness, girls will then follow up and say that if they got to know a unattractive/average guy and form a emotional connection with them, they can potentially generate a physical/sexual attraction for them if they enjoy his personality and approve of his qualifications.
I just don't see how this is possible. Maybe a platonic attraction may form, but the potential for girls to develop genuine sexual/physical attraction for non-handsome men they previously found unfuckable solely on the basis of abstract character traits is impossible.
From what ive experienced, most relationships between girls and nonchads they are "emotionally attracted to" are volatile, transactional, and mostly platonic. They seem more like contracts/arrangements instead of sexual relationships, its basically a friendship where a guy supports a girl and and once she deems he has "earned it" he potentially gets sex if she's in the mood to put up with it. The likelihood of her behaving romantically and agreeing to sex depends entirely on his qualifications and her satisfaction, generosity, and livelihood conditions. Ultimately a girl's romantic feelings and sexual desire for her nonchad partner are fake, they are lies she compelled herself to believe out of guilt due to her shallowness clashing with expected moral values. If she does love him, she only loves him as a close friend and fucks him out of obligation
There isn't a mutual sexual attraction between partners, this is only the illusion of attraction. Relationships between girls and nonchads aren't entirely black and white though, some do fall into grey areas if a nonchad has one or multiple desirable physical/genetic traits.
Biologically speaking, girls don't possess a genuine instinctive and compulsive sexual desire to fuck the majority of men. They only agree to have sex with them depending on circumstances, especially if no chads are readily available.
I just don't see how this is possible. Maybe a platonic attraction may form, but the potential for girls to develop genuine sexual/physical attraction for non-handsome men they previously found unfuckable solely on the basis of abstract character traits is impossible.
From what ive experienced, most relationships between girls and nonchads they are "emotionally attracted to" are volatile, transactional, and mostly platonic. They seem more like contracts/arrangements instead of sexual relationships, its basically a friendship where a guy supports a girl and and once she deems he has "earned it" he potentially gets sex if she's in the mood to put up with it. The likelihood of her behaving romantically and agreeing to sex depends entirely on his qualifications and her satisfaction, generosity, and livelihood conditions. Ultimately a girl's romantic feelings and sexual desire for her nonchad partner are fake, they are lies she compelled herself to believe out of guilt due to her shallowness clashing with expected moral values. If she does love him, she only loves him as a close friend and fucks him out of obligation
There isn't a mutual sexual attraction between partners, this is only the illusion of attraction. Relationships between girls and nonchads aren't entirely black and white though, some do fall into grey areas if a nonchad has one or multiple desirable physical/genetic traits.
Biologically speaking, girls don't possess a genuine instinctive and compulsive sexual desire to fuck the majority of men. They only agree to have sex with them depending on circumstances, especially if no chads are readily available.
