Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Based George Orwell (author of Animal Farm and 1984) drops a high IQ scientific blackpill WITH STATISTICS

shii410

shii410

الصابئي
★★★★★
Joined
Apr 6, 2020
Posts
17,555
this guy was a fucking visionary, this passage basically summarizes my entire socioeconomic analysis of women and it was written decades before any of us were born. there is no female equivalent to an incel or "tramp" (a man at the bottom of the socioeconomic hierarchy) because women ALWAYS have a social safety net, courtesy of their vagina. pussy is a valuable and precious commodity, so just having a vagina ensures that women will be coddled, taken care of and provided for. society's #1 priority is ensuring that women ALWAYS have their financial, social and sexual needs met unconditionally. any less is seen as a travesty that has to be immediately rectified. men, on the contrary, are seen as expendable and no one cares if they're left to rot on the streets or kill themselves

and you KNOW that if he wrote this in 2021, feminists would respond by calling him an incel and saying he has a small dick (because they don't have any other way to refute it). props to @GeneticTrashLoser for finding this

"The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.G.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

Spending the night in the streets,
60 men, 18 women.[6]
In shelters and homes not licensed as common lodging-houses,
1,057 men, 137 women.
In the crypt of St Martin’s-in-the-Fields Church,
88 men, 12 women.
In L.C.C. casual wards and hostels,
674 men, 15 women.

It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above—even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon"
 
Last edited:
It’s over for many men
 
Men must rope or cope. Nothing else
Rope or cope is law. The sad truth is that for the rest of eternity females will be given preferential treatment over males simply because of their beef curtains. Men know that the purpose of life is to engage in sexual intercourse, and so they will most likely take the soycuck route of becoming a simp. Therefore men will save women from poor situations, but the other way around will never happen because women only go for the top percentile of men that are already well-off. Here Orwell's census is from fucking 1931, and we observe the exact same behavior occurring almost a century later. Society is fucking doomed for men unless we become hyper-monogamous and restrict women's degenerate and discriminatory ways.
 
Rope or cope is law. The sad truth is that for the rest of eternity females will be given preferential treatment over males simply because of their beef curtains. Men know that the purpose of life is to engage in sexual intercourse, and so they will most likely take the soycuck route of becoming a simp. Therefore men will save women from poor situations, but the other way around will never happen because women only go for the top percentile of men that are already well-off. Here Orwell's census is from fucking 1931, and we observe the exact same behavior occurring almost a century later. Society is fucking doomed for men unless we become hyper-monogamous and restrict women's degenerate and discriminatory ways.
Even then it’s literally over
 
Even then it’s literally over
True lmao. I like using my sperg retardation to hypothesize optimally logical utopias, but at the end of the day monogamy will not quell the female nature. Even if a perfect sexual system is developed wherein people are forced to either date their looksmatch or not have a relationship at all, many women would actually just opt to not be in a relationship and just masturbate to erotica with Chad until the day they die. Even if some foids do get with their looksmatch, they will just be utterly unenthusiastic, and the passion/love that Chad experiences will never compare to your poor starfish sex that is comparable to that of fucking a hooker off the street. It's fucking over, generations alpha/beta and beyond will be even more troubled with this predicament due to the rise of openly eugenicist hypergamy. ROPE OR COPE.
 
Orwell was a fuckin genius

brb predicted rise of communist china
brb predicted flat screen televisions
brb predicted shit like alexa that spies on us
etc etc in 1948
 
There's more:

"But deeper than these there is the degradation worked in a man who knows that he is not even considered fit for marriage. The sexual impulse, not to put it any higher, is a fundamental impulse, and starvation of it can be almost as demoralizing as physical hunger. The evil of poverty is not so much that it makes a man suffer as that it rots him physically and spiritually. And there can be no doubt that sexual starvation contributes to this rotting process. Cut off from the whole race of women, a tramp feels himself degraded to the rank of a cripple or a lunatic. No humiliation could do more damage to a man’s self-respect."

Even 1984 is full of Blackpills.
 
I need to reread 1984
 
Stay away from women if you are ugly, short, bald, average.
 
Women were privileged back then, yet they claim they were oppressed in those times.
They still claim being oppressed jfl :feelskek:
 
this guy was a fucking visionary, this passage basically summarizes my entire socioeconomic analysis of women and it was written decades before any of us were born. there is no female equivalent to an incel or "tramp" (a man at the bottom of the socioeconomic hierarchy) because women ALWAYS have a social safety net, courtesy of their vagina. pussy is a valuable and precious commodity, so just having a vagina ensures that women will be coddled, taken care of and provided for. society's #1 priority is ensuring that women ALWAYS have their financial, social and sexual needs met unconditionally. any less is seen as a travesty that has to be immediately rectified. men, on the contrary, are seen as expendable and no one cares if they're left to rot on the streets or kill themselves

and you KNOW that if he wrote this in 2021, feminists would respond by calling him an incel and saying he has a small dick (because they don't have any other way to refute it). props to @GeneticTrashLoser for finding this

"The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.G.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

Spending the night in the streets,
60 men, 18 women.[6]
In shelters and homes not licensed as common lodging-houses,
1,057 men, 137 women.
In the crypt of St Martin’s-in-the-Fields Church,
88 men, 12 women.
In L.C.C. casual wards and hostels,
674 men, 15 women.

It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above—even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon"
supreme cope. Homeless Chad still slays.
 
Is that from Down and Out in Paris and London?
I read that when I was bluepilled.
 
This thread is BASED
 
this guy was a fucking visionary, this passage basically summarizes my entire socioeconomic analysis of women and it was written decades before any of us were born. there is no female equivalent to an incel or "tramp" (a man at the bottom of the socioeconomic hierarchy) because women ALWAYS have a social safety net, courtesy of their vagina. pussy is a valuable and precious commodity, so just having a vagina ensures that women will be coddled, taken care of and provided for. society's #1 priority is ensuring that women ALWAYS have their financial, social and sexual needs met unconditionally. any less is seen as a travesty that has to be immediately rectified. men, on the contrary, are seen as expendable and no one cares if they're left to rot on the streets or kill themselves

and you KNOW that if he wrote this in 2021, feminists would respond by calling him an incel and saying he has a small dick (because they don't have any other way to refute it). props to @GeneticTrashLoser for finding this

"The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.G.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

Spending the night in the streets,
60 men, 18 women.[6]
In shelters and homes not licensed as common lodging-houses,
1,057 men, 137 women.
In the crypt of St Martin’s-in-the-Fields Church,
88 men, 12 women.
In L.C.C. casual wards and hostels,
674 men, 15 women.

It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above—even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon"
good post but you should have put the quote in a quote box

like this

or in a spoiler. it was slightly hard to see where the quote started :feelswhat:
 
Most people rejected His message. Shut up! They hated Jesus because He told them the truith. Gal.4.1e Galactic Junk League text cartoon human behavior history
 
Last edited:
this guy was a fucking visionary, this passage basically summarizes my entire socioeconomic analysis of women and it was written decades before any of us were born. there is no female equivalent to an incel or "tramp" (a man at the bottom of the socioeconomic hierarchy) because women ALWAYS have a social safety net, courtesy of their vagina. pussy is a valuable and precious commodity, so just having a vagina ensures that women will be coddled, taken care of and provided for. society's #1 priority is ensuring that women ALWAYS have their financial, social and sexual needs met unconditionally. any less is seen as a travesty that has to be immediately rectified. men, on the contrary, are seen as expendable and no one cares if they're left to rot on the streets or kill themselves

and you KNOW that if he wrote this in 2021, feminists would respond by calling him an incel and saying he has a small dick (because they don't have any other way to refute it). props to @GeneticTrashLoser for finding this

"The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.G.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

Spending the night in the streets,
60 men, 18 women.[6]
In shelters and homes not licensed as common lodging-houses,
1,057 men, 137 women.
In the crypt of St Martin’s-in-the-Fields Church,
88 men, 12 women.
In L.C.C. casual wards and hostels,
674 men, 15 women.

It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above—even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon"
can someone make a compilation thread of famous people saying blackpilled stuff? I know tesla was pretty blackpilled too
 
And this was posted on April 4th. Based as fuck for those who have read 1984. lol
 
this guy was a fucking visionary, this passage basically summarizes my entire socioeconomic analysis of women and it was written decades before any of us were born. there is no female equivalent to an incel or "tramp" (a man at the bottom of the socioeconomic hierarchy) because women ALWAYS have a social safety net, courtesy of their vagina. pussy is a valuable and precious commodity, so just having a vagina ensures that women will be coddled, taken care of and provided for. society's #1 priority is ensuring that women ALWAYS have their financial, social and sexual needs met unconditionally. any less is seen as a travesty that has to be immediately rectified. men, on the contrary, are seen as expendable and no one cares if they're left to rot on the streets or kill themselves

and you KNOW that if he wrote this in 2021, feminists would respond by calling him an incel and saying he has a small dick (because they don't have any other way to refute it). props to @GeneticTrashLoser for finding this

"The second great evil of a tramp’s life—it seems much smaller at first sight, but it is a good second—is that he is entirely cut off from contact with women. This point needs elaborating.

Tramps are cut off from women, in the first place, because there are very few women at their level of society. One might imagine that among destitute people the sexes would be as equally balanced as elsewhere. But it is not so; in fact, one can almost say that below a certain level society is entirely male. The following figures, published by the L.G.C. from a night census taken on February 13th, 1931, will show the relative numbers of destitute men and destitute women:

Spending the night in the streets,
60 men, 18 women.[6]
In shelters and homes not licensed as common lodging-houses,
1,057 men, 137 women.
In the crypt of St Martin’s-in-the-Fields Church,
88 men, 12 women.
In L.C.C. casual wards and hostels,
674 men, 15 women.

It will be seen from these figures that at the charity level men outnumber women by something like ten to one. The cause is presumably that unemployment affects women less than men; also that any presentable woman can, in the last resort, attach herself to some man. The result, for a tramp, is that he is condemned to perpetual celibacy. For of course it goes without saying that if a tramp finds no women at his own level, those above—even a very little above—are as far out of his reach as the moon"
Wow
This no longer applies.
?
 
Most people rejected His message. Shut up! They hated Jesus because He told them the truith. Gal.4.1e Galactic Junk League text cartoon human behavior history
Why do I keep getting quote notis from you when you haven't quoted me? :feelswhat:
 
Men must rope or cope. Nothing else
I am coping because if I rope, the feminists will have won. They want us to suffer and die so they can laugh about it in their own forums. They want to make jokes about our lives. I do my best to ignore them and get on with my life.
 
All animals are equal :feelsrope:
 

Similar threads

Logic55
Replies
25
Views
971
Plggy20144
Plggy20144
InMemoriam
Replies
4
Views
329
highschoolcel
highschoolcel
Destroyed lonely
Replies
22
Views
582
Julaybib
Julaybib
AsiaCel
Replies
56
Views
2K
Jotasso
Jotasso

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top