![IncelWithNoLuck](/data/avatars/m/44/44660.jpg?1662567523)
IncelWithNoLuck
Banned
-
- Joined
- Jul 22, 2022
- Posts
- 1,017
It's not even the fact that we are being labelled as by far worse, or anything, I wanted to point out the methodology.
Look how in nowadays woke world, you can't say anything about GROUPS. You have something against gay people? Homophobe. You have something against Jews? Xenophobe. It goes along with literally every group, you can't say that certain group does something or shares some feature which is wrong. However, it is completely valid to cancel people, organisations AND criticize people but only based on things which don't reason their group belonging. As in - you can't criticize a gay person that he is obnoxious with being gay, you have to find another argument, etc. But anyway, it is completely viable to criticize normal people, if only we don't do it to a group.
However, when it comes to us, check what they are saying. They always say that there are incels who are not evil who are just unlucky, but anyway "all incels are the same". You see a contradiction, right? But they don't. Every single time when they notice a person who shares ALL features of incels, they want to "relabel" them and say, "nooooo you are just a virgin, not an incel, just stop being misogynistic" - but the generalisation of incels goes the same way. It's absurd in its construction even, look how would it look if we twisted it.
It's just hilarious how their leftism only works in fields, where it is convenient for them - if only something is what they don't like - free for all, you can hate it any way you want.
Look how in nowadays woke world, you can't say anything about GROUPS. You have something against gay people? Homophobe. You have something against Jews? Xenophobe. It goes along with literally every group, you can't say that certain group does something or shares some feature which is wrong. However, it is completely valid to cancel people, organisations AND criticize people but only based on things which don't reason their group belonging. As in - you can't criticize a gay person that he is obnoxious with being gay, you have to find another argument, etc. But anyway, it is completely viable to criticize normal people, if only we don't do it to a group.
However, when it comes to us, check what they are saying. They always say that there are incels who are not evil who are just unlucky, but anyway "all incels are the same". You see a contradiction, right? But they don't. Every single time when they notice a person who shares ALL features of incels, they want to "relabel" them and say, "nooooo you are just a virgin, not an incel, just stop being misogynistic" - but the generalisation of incels goes the same way. It's absurd in its construction even, look how would it look if we twisted it.
"There are some incels who are good, caring, not hateful, but all incels are the same."
They always say, that you must be an individual, your personality is based on your actions and behaviour, but if you are sexless and without relationship, you still remain with a label, which makes you "the same"."There are some priests who are good, caring and not bad at all, but all priests are pedophiles.
It's just hilarious how their leftism only works in fields, where it is convenient for them - if only something is what they don't like - free for all, you can hate it any way you want.