RageFuel Gen Z subreddit drops a blackpill and foid writes a 5 page essay full of gaslighting

[Darth Aries]

“Personality” isn’t the reason why.

Finally a post on soyddit that admits this.

This fucking gaslighting whore should hang herself in front of her own parents, I’m beyond sick of foids like this that decide to sit down and waste their precious time writing a fucking essay about why men are wrong about their own feelings of loneliness or inadequacy. This foid is not a fucking man, she has no idea what it’s like. Hell, even some men have no idea what we go through, which shows just how brutal our circumstances really are. Accountability is truly a woman’s kryptonite. They would rather write a wall of text about why you’re wrong than give you even the slightest sympathy.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

Can you link the original post?

 

[DeliriousMerchant]

I am convinced this whore gave herself that gold award. No way anybody read that and forked out cash.

 

[Darth Aries]

Can you link the original post?

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenZ/s/uhX5D8RQn7

 

[AntoCel]

"Trust the science trust the data... oh wait, it doesnr back up my worldview? Wrong, its wrong umm sample size... umm different culture.. umm... wrong, its wrong you are hateful incel, its wrong!"

 

[DeliriousMerchant]

I am convinced this whore gave herself that gold award. No way anybody read that and forked out cash.

View: https://www.reddit.com/r/GenZ/s/uhX5D8RQn7

Why do you look at this stuff, bro?

 

[lowz1r]

JFL at these copers.

Anecdotal outliers mean more to them than large sample sizes from real world data.

 

[Darth Aries]

Why do you look at this stuff, bro?

Because it’s ragefuel, hence the purpose of the prefix on this thread

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

What a silly series of retorts, I don't think she even understands how to read scientific studies and what methodology is at play.

Her "critiques" are just her making up hypothetical reasons as to why the studies aren't valid while ignoring empirical realities.

 

[Darth Aries]

View attachment 1353180

JFL at these copers.

Anecdotal outliers mean more to them than large sample sizes from real world data.

Those “average” men are most likely moggers but he or she is making it sound like they are subhumans who slay. Reddit fags love cherry picking

 

[light]

JFL at these copers.

literally the most average=chad tier jaw area + bug eyes
hot girls=LTBs with a big rack

 

[Maikowski]

arguing with a misandrist is like arguing with a flat earther except the flat earthers are more intelligent

 

[light]

What a silly series of retorts, I don't think she even understands how to read scientific studies and what methodology is at play.

Her "critiques" are just her making up hypothetical reasons as to why the studies aren't valid while ignoring empirical realities.

its a fools errand to expect a women to be objective. females are inherently emotional creatures incapable of looking at things logically. a woman evolved to be a parasite and hence had 0 use for intelligence that went beyond whatever was required to rear children

 

[Nihilistic Lowlife]

View attachment 1353180

JFL at these copers.

Anecdotal outliers mean more to them than large sample sizes from real world data.

"i know a guy' the hotgirl in question

 

[Notkev]

View attachment 1353154

View attachment 1353155

Finally a post on soyddit that admits this.

View attachment 1353157

View attachment 1353158

View attachment 1353159

This fucking gaslighting whore should hang herself in front of her own parents, I’m beyond sick of foids like this that decide to sit down and waste their precious time writing a fucking essay about why men are wrong about their own feelings of loneliness or inadequacy. This foid is not a fucking man, she has no idea what it’s like. Hell, even some men have no idea what we go through, which shows just how brutal our circumstances really are. Accountability is truly a woman’s kryptonite. They would rather write a wall of text about why you’re wrong than give you even the slightest sympathy.

Fucking dumb chad in class doesn't have to do shit and foids flock to him. But oh my personality sucks huh?

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

I'm not going to address all the bullshit she said, but just her interpretation of the study about niceness is so retarded:

In the study, responsiveness is defined as a characteristic "that may signal to potential partners that one understands, values and supports important aspects of their self-concept and is willing to invest resources in the relationship." A limitation of this definition, the authors state, is that the concept of "responsiveness" is ultimately elusive—it can mean different things to different people.

The study defines being responsive as nice; that definitely makes sense since by definition it is the quality of reacting quickly and positively.

In the first of three studies, researchers explored whether women or men perceived a receptive opposite-sex stranger as sexually desirable and, if so, whether that "responsive" quality registered as overtly feminine or masculine. The researchers found that men who perceived possible female partners as responsive found them to be "more feminine and more attractive." Past research suggests that physical cues of femininity stimulate sexual attraction because they suggest higher estrogen levels, better overall mate quality and solid reproductive health.

On the other hand, women didn't necessarily perceive a responsive man as less masculine, but they also did not find a responsive man more attractive. What's more, when women perceived their male partner to be responsive, they were less attracted to the man.

So according to this: women did not find responsive men more attractive. In fact, when women perceived their male partner as responsive, it decreased their attraction towards him. And the exact opposite was observed in men, who perceived responsive women as more attractive.

In other words, it appeared that in an initial encounter men liked nice ladies; women thought nice guys were kind of lame.

Jfl

The other 2 studies pretty much come to the same conclusions. And in the end this is said:

"Women may perceive a responsive stranger as less desirable for different reasons," said Birnbaum in a press release. "Women may perceive this person as inappropriately nice and manipulative (i.e., trying to obtain sexual favors) or eager to please, perhaps even as desperate, and therefore less sexually appealing. Alternatively, women may perceive a responsive man as vulnerable and less dominant."

In the end, the foid's entire argument against this study is that responsiveness doesn't equate to niceness. But at that point, one might begin to question how do we even define niceness? Is it objective? And if it isn't then how can one possibly know what it is to be nice?

 

[erenyeager]

View attachment 1353154

View attachment 1353155

Finally a post on soyddit that admits this.

View attachment 1353157

View attachment 1353158

View attachment 1353159

This fucking gaslighting whore should hang herself in front of her own parents, I’m beyond sick of foids like this that decide to sit down and waste their precious time writing a fucking essay about why men are wrong about their own feelings of loneliness or inadequacy. This foid is not a fucking man, she has no idea what it’s like. Hell, even some men have no idea what we go through, which shows just how brutal our circumstances really are. Accountability is truly a woman’s kryptonite. They would rather write a wall of text about why you’re wrong than give you even the slightest sympathy.

Why cant women own to their evilness like villains do already and let us take away their rights.

Like organic stfu and be the retard nature made you to be. I’m killing nature too

 

[BPJ]

View attachment 1353180

JFL at these copers.

Anecdotal outliers mean more to them than large sample sizes from real world data.

''I know a guy'' JFL

 

[BPJ]

I'm not going to address all the bullshit she said, but just her interpretation of the study about niceness is so retarded:


The study defines being responsive as nice; that definitely makes sense since by definition it is the quality of reacting quickly and positively.


So according to this: women did not find responsive men more attractive. In fact, when women perceived their male partner as responsive, it decreased their attraction towards him. And the exact opposite was observed in men, who perceived responsive women as more attractive.


Jfl

The other 2 studies pretty much come to the same conclusions. And in the end this is said:



In the end, the foid's entire argument against this study is that responsiveness doesn't equate to niceness. But at that point, one might begin to question how do we even define niceness? Is it objective? And if it isn't then how can one possibly know what it is to be nice?

in conclusion, even if you are chad enough to get her to respond, you cant respond back all the time or else she will quickly lose intrest. women are mentally ill whores.

 

[AtrociousCitizen]

in conclusion, even if you are chad enough to get her to respond, you cant respond back all the time or else she will quickly lose intrest. women are mentally ill whores.

 

[Darth Aries]

in conclusion, even if you are chad enough to get her to respond, you cant respond back all the time or else she will quickly lose intrest. women are mentally ill whores.

It is deeply over.

 

[ThanostheGOAT]

View attachment 1353154

View attachment 1353155

Finally a post on soyddit that admits this.

View attachment 1353157

View attachment 1353158

View attachment 1353159

This fucking gaslighting whore should hang herself in front of her own parents, I’m beyond sick of foids like this that decide to sit down and waste their precious time writing a fucking essay about why men are wrong about their own feelings of loneliness or inadequacy. This foid is not a fucking man, she has no idea what it’s like. Hell, even some men have no idea what we go through, which shows just how brutal our circumstances really are. Accountability is truly a woman’s kryptonite. They would rather write a wall of text about why you’re wrong than give you even the slightest sympathy.

Just from the way she talks I can tell she’s a disgusting slut irl

 

[KFM]

View attachment 1353154

View attachment 1353155

Finally a post on soyddit that admits this.

View attachment 1353157

View attachment 1353158

View attachment 1353159

This fucking gaslighting whore should hang herself in front of her own parents, I’m beyond sick of foids like this that decide to sit down and waste their precious time writing a fucking essay about why men are wrong about their own feelings of loneliness or inadequacy. This foid is not a fucking man, she has no idea what it’s like. Hell, even some men have no idea what we go through, which shows just how brutal our circumstances really are. Accountability is truly a woman’s kryptonite. They would rather write a wall of text about why you’re wrong than give you even the slightest sympathy.

"Nah bro ur the problem"

 

[DarthBurritoBastard]

Pseudo intellectual whore

 

[Spooky_Heejin]

"Trust the science trust the data... oh wait, it doesnr back up my worldview? Wrong, its wrong umm sample size... umm different culture.. umm... wrong, its wrong you are hateful incel, its wrong!"

 

[Spooky_Heejin]

in conclusion, even if you are chad enough to get her to respond, you cant respond back all the time or else she will quickly lose intrest. women are mentally ill whores.

If you respond too quick she blocks you, if you take too long she blocks you. There's no fucking winning wit this bullshit.

 

[iicc66]

"Trust the science trust the data... oh wait, it doesnr back up my worldview? Wrong, its wrong umm sample size... umm different culture.. umm... wrong, its wrong you are hateful incel, its wrong!"

Jfl

 

[lifesucksandyoudie]

Too bad data outside of online dating also proves looks > personality
Trust the science bigots

 

[Ibrahim997]

This is proof Foids could read.

 

[Officer KD6-3.7]

Someone go run over that fucking brainless foid. what she said is literally her being delusional and in her dream fantasy land.

- if we use statistics about blackpill - "uhmm its wrong (even tho statistics right Infront of her), uhmm its seen the wrong way, *blocked*, *someone report this incel*, literally rejects years worth of popular research just because it doesnt align with their shitty bluepilled feminist agenda "
- if we dont use statistics while talking about blackpill - "where are the statistics, your just an incel , stop being misoginistic

soyddit and foids make my blood boil

 

[justuseless]

Stab these cunts to the death in minecraft

 

[Vakasneb3856]

I like how many arguments are "your sample size is too small" Yet this bitch says hey inky your sample size is too big
"Second is irrelvent to dating" How retarded is this bitch? Of course sexual body counts matter, it shows your capability of getting in a sexual relationship as IS important in dating. If you aint getting sex you ain't in a sexual relationship what a smooth brain fucking slag.
3rd part she admits it but it's and bad boys win but goes "muh high school bubbles" she can't admit the dark triad reality of the real world.
"That doesn't count because that kind of niceness is not nice to me therefore study wrong!"
How does she shove the "prone people get easy access to sex" of course they do, they are foids that go brain dead for dark triad chad!
Tinder is a hookup site? To this bitch it is because all she uses it is to get 1000's of dudes to blow up her beef flaps. Tinder is a dating app regardless if people search up others for hookups or dates, reason being its pointing that looks only matter and personality has no influence on getting people to desire you, just because people search for difference things does not disprove the values which people want.
This bitch deserves the currypits.

 

[LastGerman]

Just the gaslighting from other people there is outlandish. They seriously say stuff like "just go outside brah". What incredible advice that is. I have never heard that one before.