Gang rapists should receive prison sentences that are divided by the number of gang rapists because they weren't all solely responsible for the rape. It wasn't one person's sole idea. They only committed a fraction of the rape. I support this idea because I think there should be lighter punishments for rapists. I don't know what the punishment for rape is, but let's say it's 5 years(60 months), but it was a gang rape with 20 gang rapists. 60 divided by 20 means each should only do 3 months in prison. Of course, it's been said that the punishment for rape should just be to pay the victim the going price for a prostitute, so the monetary punishment should depend on how long the rape lasted and it should be divided by the number of gang rapists and paid for by each gang rapist, but until we have that policy, the law should give lighter sentences to gang rapists. It's also already been said before that rape has at least a neutral effect on happiness, or positive effect if a child is conceived in rape. It's obviously a net gain in world happiness when it's a gang rape because all the gang rapists benefitted. The happiness of a gang outweighs the unhappiness of a victim. It's the same logic as saying that a prostitute should be paid the same amount whether it's one John or more Johns, who can divide the price among themselves. It's not like the prostitute has to work harder since they often give starfish sex where they don't work on it. Even if she does work on it, it's not difficult work.
Perhaps another example of why gang rapists should receive lighter punishments is that perhaps some of them get egged on into raping. They were a victim of peer pressure. Therefore some members of the rape gang may be victims too. Perhaps they were forced with the threat of violence to rape. They're as much victims as the rape victim, yet I've never heard of the gang leader receiving the sole punishment for pushing the gang members to rape. The gang leader actually did the rapist a favor by forcing him.
Also, we already know rape is okay, but isn't gang rape progressive because it's basically an orgy? It's like polyamory or heterosexual polyandry. It's not traditional monogamy. Isn't polyandry actually practiced by some non-Whites? Frankly, gang rapes are often by non-Whites. You know this if you read Adios, America by Ann Coulter. Therefore foids being against gang rape is racist. I guess rape in general is often a non-White thing, so I guess this paragraph is redundant.
Perhaps another example of why gang rapists should receive lighter punishments is that perhaps some of them get egged on into raping. They were a victim of peer pressure. Therefore some members of the rape gang may be victims too. Perhaps they were forced with the threat of violence to rape. They're as much victims as the rape victim, yet I've never heard of the gang leader receiving the sole punishment for pushing the gang members to rape. The gang leader actually did the rapist a favor by forcing him.
Also, we already know rape is okay, but isn't gang rape progressive because it's basically an orgy? It's like polyamory or heterosexual polyandry. It's not traditional monogamy. Isn't polyandry actually practiced by some non-Whites? Frankly, gang rapes are often by non-Whites. You know this if you read Adios, America by Ann Coulter. Therefore foids being against gang rape is racist. I guess rape in general is often a non-White thing, so I guess this paragraph is redundant.
Last edited:
