Welcome to Incels.is - Involuntary Celibate Forum

Welcome! This is a forum for involuntary celibates: people who lack a significant other. Are you lonely and wish you had someone in your life? You're not alone! Join our forum and talk to people just like you.

Discussion Game of Thrones: Better rates of success for incels in 14th 15th century?

Scr3am0u33ns

Scr3am0u33ns

Recruit
★★★★
Joined
Dec 27, 2018
Posts
313
I recently started watching Game of Thrones and am encouraged to believe that if a manlet like Tyrion is able to fornicate with some of the women of that era as an imp, i probably would have cleaned house too as an incel. Actually starting to believe that an incel from the 21st century is probably a normie back then.
 
The only people that were incels during that century were those that died in war before ascending. That or dying at a young age by some illness before ascension.
 
Bro it's literally a tv series. Tyrion HIMSELF said that no one finds him attractive and people just virtue signal on the internet. And again, he HIMSELF said that girls would always choose a 6 foot guy over him
 
Game of soys is just a fantasy written by some fat fuck feminist. It doesn't reflect reality.
 
That show is set in a fantasy world, not 14/15th century. It has dragons and magic in it.
 
Lotr mogs GoT to oblivion
Also
Game of soys is just a fantasy written by some fat fuck feminist. It doesn't reflect reality.
 
Breaking Bad is superior.
 
well if we're talking about the medieval era yea a incel now could be a normie then.
Men died at a far higher rate then females so there was a gender disparity with more women then men meaning women couldn't be as picky plus societal pressure to marry early and your father being the one to decide who you would marry basically meant hypergamy was kept to a minimum.
But also its a TV show based off a fantasy novel so it obviously not realistic.
 
Last edited:
The only people that were incels during that century were those that died in war before ascending. That or dying at a young age by some illness before ascension.
Well Tyrion, in my opinion, is clearly an incel at 2'5" and Tyrion, in my opinion, is clearly fornicating with upper level foids on a regular basis!!!
 
The only people that were incels during that century were those that died in war before ascending. That or dying at a young age by some illness before ascension.
 
Well Tyrion, in my opinion, is clearly an incel at 2'5" and Tyrion, in my opinion, is clearly fornicating with upper level foids on a regular basis!!!
Never watched games of thrones as I don't watch TV. I'm not a normie. I'm just talking statistics in the 14th and 15th century. I mean, if you go just to the 1800s and see some of the really old early photographs of families, you can see many people who if they were alive to this day would be incel. Statistically, you see more, and more, and more, and more guys becoming incel as time goes on.
Illness and war were the only ones that were incel if they didn't have sex before death from those.
 
Bro it's literally a tv series. Tyrion HIMSELF said that no one finds him attractive and people just virtue signal on the internet. And again, he HIMSELF said that girls would always choose a 6 foot guy over him
Game of soys is just a fantasy written by some fat fuck feminist. It doesn't reflect reality.
That show is set in a fantasy world, not 14/15th century. It has dragons and magic in it.
Oh really, bro? Thought it was based on a true story, bro? I still think I wouldve had an easier time and more chances at meaningful relationship in that era...bro.
 
Oh really, bro? Thought it was based on a true story, bro? I still think I wouldve had an easier time and more chances at meaningful relationship in that era...bro.

Actually starting to believe that an incel from the 21st century is probably a normie back then.

The bolded part made me think you believed it was historical fiction.
I don't watch the show, maybe dragons and magic aren't in the first seasons that you watched.
 
Bro it's literally a tv series. Tyrion HIMSELF said that no one finds him attractive and people just virtue signal on the internet. And again, he HIMSELF said that girls would always choose a 6 foot guy over him
 
Oh really, bro? Thought it was based on a true story, bro? I still think I wouldve had an easier time and more chances at meaningful relationship in that era...bro.
Bro that's not an "era" in history JFL its literally fiction. It's not like a depiction of whatever time period in human history, it's literally FICTION from top to bottom.

I think even hundreds of years ago, someone like Tyrion would have rotted in a river alone and virgin, even with his intelligence and charisma JFL.
 
Bro that's not an "era" in history JFL its literally fiction. It's not like a depiction of whatever time period in human history, it's literally FICTION from top to bottom.

I think even hundreds of years ago, someone like Tyrion would have rotted in a river alone and virgin, even with his intelligence and charisma JFL.
Maybe, but a good cope series to watch just the same.
 
he was literally son of noble and even worked as hand of the king, statusmaxxed for sure

yet throughout the series he basically just coped drinking and escortcelling.
 
The bolded part made me think you believed it was historical fiction.
I don't watch the show, maybe dragons and magic aren't in the first seasons that you watched.
No, there are dragons and a bit of magic in the first 2 seasons, but void of that, I still think in that era things wouldve been easier at potentially meeting and maintaining a relationship with possibly a normie or becky for that matter. Maybe just a cope on my part but so be it!
 
Bro it's literally a tv series. Tyrion HIMSELF said that no one finds him attractive and people just virtue signal on the internet. And again, he HIMSELF said that girls would always choose a 6 foot guy over him
JFL I saw that video of him saying that. Truly over.
 
Well Tyrion, in my opinion, is clearly an incel at 2'5" and Tyrion, in my opinion, is clearly fornicating with upper level foids on a regular basis!!!
He is a Lannister.. aka a noble.. other lords kill those that don't fornicate with them.. some even if they do. It's really fucking stupid that series.. not enough gore, rape and torture to be any kind of accurate representation of anything so don't read too much into it. In this world for instance king Richard III was an Incel Hunch Backed tyrant (which is based). In Shakespeare's Richard III there is a Soliloquy:

Now is the winter of our discontent
Made glorious summer by this son of York;
And all the clouds that lour’d upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths,
Our bruised arms hung up for monuments,
Our stern alarums chang’d to merry meetings,
Our dreadful marches to delightful measures.
Grim-visaged war hath smooth’d his wrinkled front:
And now, instead of mounting barded steeds
To fright the souls of fearful adversaries,
He capers nimbly in a lady’s chamber,
To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.
But I, that am not shap’d for sportive tricks,
Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;
I, that am rudely stamp’d, and want love’s majesty
To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;
I, that am curtail’d of this fair proportion,
Cheated of feature by dissembling Nature,
Deformed, unfinish’d, sent before my time
Into this breathing world, scarce half made up –
And that so lamely and unfashionable
That dogs bark at me, as I halt by them –
Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,
Have no delight to pass away the time,
Unless to spy my shadow in the sun,
And descant on mine own deformity.
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a villain,
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.
Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,
By drunken prophecies, libels and dreams,
To set my brother Clarence and the King
In deadly hate, the one against the other:
And if King Edward be as true and just
As I am subtle, false and treacherous,
This day should Clarence closely be mew’d up,
About a prophecy, which says that ‘G’
Of Edward’s heirs the murderer shall be –
Dive, thoughts, down to my soul: here Clarence comes.
Spoken by Richard (Act 1, Scene 1)

Here in the real world such fantasy does not exist. It baffles me that normies think fantasy can become reality in such ways as to bite its thumb at realities harshness. Here the ugly Man suffers verily while the attractive Man saunters merrily. Richard III comes off as a warning that is unheeded by modern day retards of how abuse can affect a Man. But instead imagine a small but growing population of Men that think like Richard III does? He was real and a murderous tyrant(which I have no problem with.. it is only natural to seek superiority). The more society cares not for our plight the more Richards fall through their fingers like sand.
And again, he HIMSELF said that girls would always choose a 6 foot guy over him
Just like Bagelcel. :feelsbadman: They know the struggle.
 
Last edited:
He is a Lannister.. aka a noble.. other lords kill those that don't fornicate with them.. some even if they do. It's really fucking stupid that series.. not enough gore, rape and torture to be any kind of accurate representation of anything so don't read too much into it. In this world for instance king Richard III was an Incel Hunch Backed tyrant (which is based). In Shakespeare's Richard III there is a Soliloquy:

Now is the winter of our discontent
Made glorious summer by this son of York;
And all the clouds that lour’d upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths,
Our bruised arms hung up for monuments,
Our stern alarums chang’d to merry meetings,
Our dreadful marches to delightful measures.
Grim-visaged war hath smooth’d his wrinkled front:
And now, instead of mounting barded steeds
To fright the souls of fearful adversaries,
He capers nimbly in a lady’s chamber,
To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.
But I, that am not shap’d for sportive tricks,
Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;
I, that am rudely stamp’d, and want love’s majesty
To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;
I, that am curtail’d of this fair proportion,
Cheated of feature by dissembling Nature,
Deformed, unfinish’d, sent before my time
Into this breathing world, scarce half made up –
And that so lamely and unfashionable
That dogs bark at me, as I halt by them –
Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,
Have no delight to pass away the time,
Unless to spy my shadow in the sun,
And descant on mine own deformity.
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a villain,
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.
Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,
By drunken prophecies, libels and dreams,
To set my brother Clarence and the King
In deadly hate, the one against the other:
And if King Edward be as true and just
As I am subtle, false and treacherous,
This day should Clarence closely be mew’d up,
About a prophecy, which says that ‘G’
Of Edward’s heirs the murderer shall be –
Dive, thoughts, down to my soul: here Clarence comes.
Spoken by Richard (Act 1, Scene 1)

Here in the real world such fantasy does not exist. It baffles me that normies think fantasy can become reality in such ways as to bite its thumb at realities harshness. Here the ugly Man suffers verily while the attractive Man saunters merrily. Richard III comes off as a warning that is unheeded by modern day retards of how abuse can affect a Man. But instead imagine a small but growing population of Men that think like Richard III does? He was real and a murderous tyrant(which I have no problem with.. it is only natural to seek superiority). The more society cares not for our plight the more Richards fall through their fingers like sand.

Just like Bagelcel. :feelsbadman: They know the struggle.
Did you really just quote Shakespeare (a play) to answer my post? Im flattered buddy, but I'll still go with the belief that I'd be better off in that era than today.
 
Now is the winter of our discontent
Made glorious summer by this son of York;
And all the clouds that lour’d upon our house
In the deep bosom of the ocean buried.
Now are our brows bound with victorious wreaths,
Our bruised arms hung up for monuments,
Our stern alarums chang’d to merry meetings,
Our dreadful marches to delightful measures.
Grim-visaged war hath smooth’d his wrinkled front:
And now, instead of mounting barded steeds
To fright the souls of fearful adversaries,
He capers nimbly in a lady’s chamber,
To the lascivious pleasing of a lute.
But I, that am not shap’d for sportive tricks,
Nor made to court an amorous looking-glass;
I, that am rudely stamp’d, and want love’s majesty
To strut before a wanton ambling nymph;
I, that am curtail’d of this fair proportion,
Cheated of feature by dissembling Nature,
Deformed, unfinish’d, sent before my time
Into this breathing world, scarce half made up –
And that so lamely and unfashionable
That dogs bark at me, as I halt by them –
Why, I, in this weak piping time of peace,
Have no delight to pass away the time,
Unless to spy my shadow in the sun,
And descant on mine own deformity.
And therefore, since I cannot prove a lover,
To entertain these fair well-spoken days,
I am determined to prove a villain,
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.
Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,
By drunken prophecies, libels and dreams,
To set my brother Clarence and the King
In deadly hate, the one against the other:
And if King Edward be as true and just
As I am subtle, false and treacherous,
This day should Clarence closely be mew’d up,
About a prophecy, which says that ‘G’
Of Edward’s heirs the murderer shall be –
Dive, thoughts, down to my soul: here Clarence comes.
Spoken by Richard (Act 1, Scene 1)

That play is really overrated.
It's Shakespeare's fourth play (I think), and he wasn't a master of his art yet.
It has around 10,000 characters and two or three memorable speeches.
It tells you a lot that every film adaptation of it cuts out around half the play.

The Hollow Crown did a good adaptation of it. They moved the "hand in hand to hell" line to just before Richard's final charge (Richard III with Ian McKellan moved it to the very end), which is clearly where the line should have been in the first place.
 
That play is really overrated.
It's Shakespeare's fourth play (I think), and he wasn't a master of his art yet.
It has around 10,000 characters and two or three memorable speeches.
It tells you a lot that every film adaptation of it cuts out around half the play.

The Hollow Crown did a good adaptation of it. They moved the "hand in hand to hell" line to just before Richard's final charge (Richard III with Ian McKellan moved it to the very end), which is clearly where the line should have been in the first place.
Ok.. I only really know about the Soliloquy tbh.
Did you really just quote Shakespeare (a play) to answer my post? Im flattered buddy, but I'll still go with the belief that I'd be better off in that era than today.
I was tired tbh. :feelskek: My posts tend to get more autistic the more tired I am.
 
Ok.. I only really know about the Soliloquy tbh.

Clarence's speech right before he dies is good too, but it's a worse version of Prospero's speech in The Tempest.
I want to discuss Shakespeare, anyone PM me if you want to do this.
 
Fuck that stupid normscum show
 
This is what happens when an autistic person watches a TV show
 
Well Tyrion, in my opinion, is clearly an incel at 2'5" and Tyrion, in my opinion, is clearly fornicating with upper level foids on a regular basis!!!
it doesn't matter if he was a fucking frog its a TV show. Even though is a fiction, he only have been with prostitutes
Breaking Bad is superior.
 
Last edited:
Clarence's speech right before he dies is good too, but it's a worse version of Prospero's speech in The Tempest.
Kaliban was my favourite character.. the teacher asked us our favourite character and when I said it they recoiled in disgust. He was my favourite because I could relate to him. :feelsbadman:
 
Kaliban was my favourite character.. the teacher asked us our favourite character and when I said it they recoiled in disgust. He was my favourite because I could relate to him. :feelsbadman:

That's understandable.
Everyone is so needlessly cruel to him in the play.
He's like a hapa, born of a sea witch and something else.
I don't love that play, I think it's too boring.
I like Hamlet, King Lear, Macbeth, Measure for Measure, Julius Caesar, and Corianolus.
 
That's understandable.
Everyone is so needlessly cruel to him in the play.
He's like a hapa, born of a sea witch and something else.
I don't love that play, I think it's too boring.
I like Hamlet, King Lear, Macbeth, Measure for Measure, Julius Caesar, and Corianolus.
Cool.. had to do a school study on that boring play. I'm not so into plays.. unless the play is about ER or other Incels then what is the point? :feelsokman:
 
In that time, people drank so much alcohol, even Stacey could not tell Chad from a normie or an incel. And women had much less freedom. AND NO TINDER ALGORITMS. Probably also not too many mirrors, so Stacey could not know about her beauty as much
 
Cool.. had to do a school study on that boring play. I'm not so into plays.. unless the play is about ER or other Incels then what is the point? :feelsokman:

Caliban tried to rape Miranda so he became an outcast.

A lot of modern Shakespeare scholars try to say that Caliban was black, so they can connect The Tempest to BLM and "race studies", even though Shakespeare never said Caliban was black in any way.
It also pisses me off when they try to put Shakespeare in a feminist frame and study Hamlet through the lens of Ophelia or even act like Shylock the Jew is the hero protagonist of Merchant of Venice when he's clearly the villain.
It's especially annoying with Othello and The Tempest because now the criticism is all about how black people are oppressed and not the other parts of the play.
You have to read only the old criticism of Shakespeare, Arden 2 and before.
 
A lot of modern Shakespeare scholars try to say that Caliban was black, so they can connect The Tempest to BLM and "race studies", even though Shakespeare never said Caliban was black in any way.
I always thought he was green.. like the seaweed and algae.
It also pisses me off when they try to put Shakespeare in a feminist frame and study Hamlet through the lens of Ophelia or even act like Shylock the Jew is the hero protagonist of Merchant of Venice when he's clearly the villain.
Yeah.. it all fits a slimy narrative when they try to spin it like one way.
It's especially annoying with Othello and The Tempest because now the criticism is all about how black people are oppressed and not the other parts of the play.
You have to read only the old criticism of Shakespeare, Arden 2 and before.
Normies ruin everything.. you can't even look at intelligent critique anymore.. it is non stop race bating and feminist sabre rattling.
Caliban tried to rape Miranda so he became an outcast.
Over for Calibancles.
 
Over for Calibancles.

Miranda fucked Caliban for his BBC and when Prospero found out his daughter was a coalburner, she lied and said he raped her, thus Caliban got #MeTooed.
 
Miranda fucked Caliban for his BBC and when Prospero found out his daughter was a coalburner, she lied and said he raped her, thus Caliban got #MeTooed.
#FreeCaliban #Calibandidnothingwrong. :feelsbadman:

Shakespeare is Blackpilled tbh. He knows what whores are like. They'll have sex then falsely claim they were raped when confronted about it and they can lose status from not doing so. Another story from history that is notable is the story of Helen of Troy.. of how a Foid will happily pick the victor of a conflict and will seek to create the conflict so well.. but they will all to happily remove themselves from any responsibility.
 
#FreeCaliban #Calibandidnothingwrong. :feelsbadman:

Shakespeare is Blackpilled tbh. He knows what whores are like. They'll have sex then falsely claim they were raped when confronted about it and they can lose status from not doing so. Another story from history that is notable is the story of Helen of Troy.. of how a Foid will happily pick the victor of a conflict and will seek to create the conflict so well.. but they will all to happily remove themselves from any responsibility.

Yeah, Trollius and Cressida deals with the Helen of Troy conflict.
I haven't read that one yet.
But Hamlet himself says a lot of blackpilled things in the play. His mom is a whore.
 
it doesn't matter if he was a fucking frog its a TV show. Even though is a fiction, he only have been with prostitutes
I know its a tv show, so is breaking bad. I also know its fiction and that dragons and magic arent real. What I do know, is that there was an era in time in which the world was made up of kings, queens, princes, princesses, commoners, and bottom feeders. Im happy to see that this thread turned into a Shakespeare book reading club but back to my point. I think i would have had a better chance at a meaningful relationship then as opposed to now. Thats it.
 
I know its a tv show, so is breaking bad. I also know its fiction and that dragons and magic arent real. What I do know, is that there was an era in time in which the world was made up of kings, queens, princes, princesses, commoners, and bottom feeders. Im happy to see that this thread turned into a Shakespeare book reading club but back to my point. I think i would have had a better chance at a meaningful relationship then as opposed to now. Thats it.
Depends how rich or poor you would be, then there was much less people so it was easer to own piece of land.
 
Depends how rich or poor you would be, then there was much less people so it was easer to own piece of land.
So youre suggesting that if you were rich back then, it wouldve been easier to attract foids? Im sorry but im confused, my initial post was a simple statement that morphed into discussing Shakespeare, and now turned into wealthmaxxing theory as an element of attracting foids? Anyways, thanks to everyone for input but i still think Tyrion (the imp manlet) did pretty good for an incel!!!!
 
Everyone got their looksmatch pussy back then. However, a big portion of the men in lots of countries died to wars and diseases. If you're the lucky part of the population to survive, life was gruel, but worth it (because of the pussy and offspring).

The men that had it best ever are the people that were born in the first few decades post WW2 though. Those boomers and Gen Xers married their looksmatches in their early 20s for the most part and enjoyed virgin looksmatch pussy as well as the stability of a nuclear family and a thriving economy. For early and middle millennials it has been hit or miss while for late millennials and zoomers (so about '95 and up) it's terrible. Terrible economies with ever decreasing middle classes and hypergamy on steroids meaning less than 20% of the western population of post '95 born males having sex on a regular base (few times a week), while everyone else has sex a few times a year or not at all. Not to forget the way ur treated in this new eat or be eaten/mog or be mogged world and the constant aggression and gaslighting when you dare to even mention something related to the blackpill in public.
 
Everyone got their looksmatch pussy back then. However, a big portion of the men in lots of countries died to wars and diseases. If you're the lucky part of the population to survive, life was gruel, but worth it (because of the pussy and offspring).

The men that had it best ever are the people that were born in the first few decades post WW2 though. Those boomers and Gen Xers married their looksmatches in their early 20s for the most part and enjoyed virgin looksmatch pussy as well as the stability of a nuclear family and a thriving economy. For early and middle millennials it has been hit or miss while for late millennials and zoomers (so about '95 and up) it's terrible. Terrible economies with ever decreasing middle classes and hypergamy on steroids meaning less than 20% of the western population of post '95 born males having sex on a regular base (few times a week), while everyone else has sex a few times a year or not at all. Not to forget the way ur treated in this new eat or be eaten/mog or be mogged world and the constant aggression and gaslighting when you dare to even mention something related to the blackpill in public.
Makes sense, thanks for the reply.
 
Yeah, Trollius and Cressida deals with the Helen of Troy conflict.
Had no idea about that. I don't really know much about Shakespeare tbh. Glad the conflicts were chronicled by him.. he is a timeless genius.
But Hamlet himself says a lot of blackpilled things in the play. His mom is a whore.
Are not all Foids whores before Chad?
 
Are not all Foids whores before Chad?

Yes, but the play implies that Hamlet (king) was the chad and Claudius was an ugly incel.

After Hamlet's (protagonist) father died, his mother immediately married Claudius, the brother of the deceased.
And there are many clues that she had been fucking Claudius even before King Hamlet was murdered. (the "enseamed bed" Hamlet refers to).
Some scholars even think she conspired with Claudius in the murder, although in my reading, I think she was innocent of that.

So Hamlet (protagonist) is disgusted by his mother's disloyalty to his father and immediate remarriage to Claudius, which makes her a whore in his eyes.
 
Yes, but the play implies that Hamlet (king) was the chad and Claudius was an ugly incel.

After Hamlet's (protagonist) father died, his mother immediately married Claudius, the brother of the deceased.
And there are many clues that she had been fucking Claudius even before King Hamlet was murdered. (the "enseamed bed" Hamlet refers to).
Some scholars even think she conspired with Claudius in the murder, although in my reading, I think she was innocent of that.

So Hamlet (protagonist) is disgusted by his mother's disloyalty to his father and immediate remarriage to Claudius, which makes her a whore in his eyes.
Shakespeare is based and blackpilled tbh. Shakespearepilled. :blackpill:
 
Shakespeare is based and blackpilled tbh. Shakespearepilled. :blackpill:

Agreed, although he made a lot of virginal foid characters too, though maybe it was common during his time.

A message to OP:
These discussions about Shakespeare are relevant to this thread, especially about Hamlet, since both stories take place around the same time period (like Game of Thrones) and also the play of Hamlet proves that an incel-tier Claudius was able to fuck Gertrude through killing King Hamlet, thus proving your original hypothesis.
 
Agreed, although he made a lot of virginal foid characters too, though maybe it was common during his time.
One aspect that makes little sense in the modern world.. if Shakespeare was alive today his plays would be degenerate.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

shape1
shape2
shape3
shape4
shape5
shape6
Back
Top