fucking reddit

[Deleted member 3291]

I make a post asking for knowledge and help and they go through my history then start bringing it up in comments

 

[Deleted member 818]

which subreddit?

 

[PersonalityChad]

Stop going on ((((((reddit)))))) buddy

 

[Deleted member 3291]

which subreddit?

cscareerquestions

 

[Indari]

i fuckin hate that shit

 

[heroinfather]

cscareerquestions

they are incels themselves then kek

 

[Indari]

u hav cs question? lol uwill nevr b sucesful in cs as long as u disrepeck wimin. take that dirtty insell

 

[Deleted member 3291]

u hav cs question? lol uwill nevr b sucesful in cs as long as u disrepeck wimin. take that dirtty insell

i asked them what options i could do since i dropped a semester of uni due to mental problems and lost my scholarships and can't get student loans, and then they started going through my history and my username since i had incel in it. then deleted my acc

 

[Indari]

i asked them what options i could do since i dropped a semester of uni due to mental problems and lost my scholarships and can't get student loans, and then they started going through my history and my username since i had incel in it. then deleted my acc

 

[Deleted member 2119]

i asked them what options i could do since i dropped a semester of uni due to mental problems and lost my scholarships and can't get student loans, and then they started going through my history and my username since i had incel in it. then deleted my acc

Are they serious? That is utterly retarded.

 

[Deleted member 6329]

Posting on Reddit was your first mistake

 

[Deleted member 3291]

Posting on Reddit was your first mistake

yeah it’s why I got rid of my account or in case they would search for me

 

[Incellectual]

Posting on Reddit was your first mistake

 

[PM_ME_STRIPPERS]

yea thats just reddit numales at work once again

 

[Ritalincel]

u hav cs question? lol uwill nevr b sucesful in cs as long as u disrepeck wimin. take that dirtty insell

 

[Timothy2:12]

fuck if i know that feeling, i had to delete all my identifying shit because those idiots won't stop harassing us

 

[BasedGod1]

they are incels themselves then kek

 

[Juxtaposition6]

I make a post asking for knowledge and help and they go through my history then start bringing it up in comments

Jfl that's some grudge-holding cuntery like i've never seen, they look at your entire post history like they're appointed to foil a terrorist plot.

 

[averageblokecel]

i asked them what options i could do since i dropped a semester of uni due to mental problems and lost my scholarships and can't get student loans, and then they started going through my history and my username since i had incel in it. then deleted my acc

Holy crappo and then are we the scum?

 

[boojies]

I was banned from reddit on my original account there due to so-called "child sexualization", which was in fact me posting things such as this:

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/cop_shop/article_2ee0f064-7888-11df-9e7a-001cc4c03286.html

Some law-enforcement officials contend that disrupting the companies making a profit off child pornography may only be the tip of the iceberg. Matt Dunn, of the Cyber Crimes Center at the Immigration and Customs Enforcement bureau, said that non-commercial child pornography -- images shared without money changing hands -- is more of a concern than the for-profit industry.

Swapping child porn over file-sharing networks is ongoing -- and it's usually non-commercial, Dunn said. "It's happening every second of every day," he said.

Dunn also questions the estimate that commercial child porn is a $20 billion a year industry -- a figure cited in a 2006 congressional hearing -- and instead thinks it's substantially lower, perhaps in the tens of millions of dollars.

http://libertus.net/censor/resources/statistics-laundering.html#s3bfg

"child pornography is a $20 billion industry worldwide"

This out-of-date/discredited $20 billion 'statistic' was given new life in March 2008 when it appeared in Australian media reports as a result of a joint media release between the Australian Federal Police and Microsoft. The statistic was disowned in April 2006 by the organisations to which it had been, and still is being, attributed (i.e. the FBI and Unicef).

"child pornography is one of the fastest growing online businesses generating approximately $US3 billion ($3.43 billion) each year"

This '$US3 billion' figure has no credibility and even if it was factual as at January 2008, (when it appeared in an opinion article by Bernadette McMenamin, CEO of Child Wise/ ECPAT in Australia, with citing a source), then it could be regarded as 'good news' because it would mean (based on previously promulgated 'statistics') that there had been no increase at all in the five years to 2008, therefore 'child pornography' could not be "one of the fastest growing online businesses".

The '$US3 billion' figure has been promulgated far and wide since at least mid 2003, when Utah-based Jerry Ropelato commenced publishing it, without citing a source, on his web site InternetFilterReview.com, which has since become part of his TopTenReviews.com. According to Texas-based Red Orbit News (5 Nov 2006) Ropelato was "formerly chief operating officer of ContentWatch, a Salt Lake City-based developer of Internet filtering and virus protection software. He is also known locally as a speaker and presenter on Internet safety issues, and as a crusader against online pornography."[44]

The "fastest growing online businesses" claim originated with the U.S. NCMEC, in August 2005, which based its claim on the then two-year old US$3 billion 'statistic' promulgated by Ropelato. (The U.S. NCMEC has a long history of promulgating exaggerated/false statistics[45].)

http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3596661/House+Hears+Online+Child+Porn+Testimony.htm

Congressional estimates put the online child pornography business at $20 billion a year and growing. Online or offline, child pornography is illegal in the United States and most other countries.

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32880508/...ty/t/un-expert-child-porn-internet-increases/

More than 4 million Web sites worldwide show images of children being sexually exploited, said the U.N. investigator on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography, Najat M'jid Maalla.
....
Maalla urged international cooperation to stop the child pornography industry, which she estimated to be worth between $3 billion and $20 billion. She recommended countries share information on sites containing child pornography in order to block them faster.

In an attempt to draw attention to the fact that the Sex Cult is a 20th century establishment of religion. I did not sexualize children, I drew attention to the state of psychotic decompensation of the adherents to the Sex Cult. Of course though, I am well aware that on 99.99% of the Internet it is the crime of heresy to do anything other than sing the praises of the Sex Cult, which is traced back through an outbreak of schizophrenia in which individuals believed magical flying teachers were sexually abusing children in the name of the dark lord Satan.

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/p...n/news-story/da15171042d0783c6c8f6deb87dc579b

In 1983, Judy Johnson, of California, accused a teacher at her son’s preschool of raping him, said faculty members had sex with animals and even claimed the teacher could fly.

Johnson was hospitalised with paranoid schizophrenia and died before the end of the preliminary hearing from problems related to alcoholism. But LA’s Children’s Institute International then interviewed several hundred children about the alleged incident.

The students were coerced through suggestive interview techniques into making bizarre claims including the existence of secret tunnels under the school in which the alleged abuse took place; orgies supposedly conducted in car washes and airports; disturbing games in which children were allegedly photographed nude; mutilation of corpses; blood drinking; baby sacrifice and a flying teacher.

Pazder was consulted by the prosecution as an expert on Satanic ritual abuse and corroborated the claims. All parties in the McMartin preschool trial were acquitted of all charges in 1990.

Stating truthful information regarding the 20th century religious establishment of the Sex Cult is grounds for immediate banning on 99.99% of the Internet. However, it was only after I pointed out that singular they is not considered proper English, despite it being extremely common and a construct that I personally make frequent use of and find to be proper, that they dug through my post history in a fit of rage at my understanding of the rules of traditional English, toward finding my several month old post which originally had only seen me banned from the subreddit I posted it in, toward using it to have me banned from the entire site for so-called "child sexualization".

 

[Deleted member 3291]

I was banned from reddit on my original account there due to so-called "child sexualization", which was in fact me posting things such as this:

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/local/cop_shop/article_2ee0f064-7888-11df-9e7a-001cc4c03286.html



http://libertus.net/censor/resources/statistics-laundering.html#s3bfg






http://www.internetnews.com/bus-news/article.php/3596661/House+Hears+Online+Child+Porn+Testimony.htm



http://www.nbcnews.com/id/32880508/...ty/t/un-expert-child-porn-internet-increases/



In an attempt to draw attention to the fact that the Sex Cult is a 20th century establishment of religion. I did not sexualize children, I drew attention to the state of psychotic decompensation of the adherents to the Sex Cult. Of course though, I am well aware that on 99.99% of the Internet it is the crime of heresy to do anything other than sing the praises of the Sex Cult, which is traced back through an outbreak of schizophrenia in which individuals believed magical flying teachers were sexually abusing children in the name of the dark lord Satan.

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/p...n/news-story/da15171042d0783c6c8f6deb87dc579b



Stating truthful information regarding the 20th century religious establishment of the Sex Cult is grounds for immediate banning on 99.99% of the Internet. However, it was only after I pointed out that singular they is not considered proper English, despite it being extremely common and a construct that I personally make frequent use of and find to be proper, that they dug through my post history in a fit of rage at my understanding of the rules of traditional English, toward finding my several month old post which originally had only seen me banned from the subreddit I posted it in, toward using it to have me banned from the entire site for so-called "child sexualization".

In depth

 

[idkwattodowithlife]

Reddit is pathetic.

Sheep-like thinking and if you get one downvote, then you'll get multiple downvotes.

 

[gstvtrp]

fucking lol