> Women are somehow predisposed to think MOST men are undesirable.
it's called hypergamy. it's the defining trait of where the homo subfamily diverged from other primates... in all of the rest, females mate indiscriminately with males. it is then entirely up to males to battle each other and show/threaten dominance in order to breed. but hypergamy dictates that human females mate very discriminately -- only with the top 10-20% of men they perceive to be available.
this is fine when hypergamy is kept in check with monogamy. top people pair off and are removed from the mating market. then the next percentile of men pair off, and this repeats over ~10 years until 80% of society is paired off.
but when monogamy is replaced by female sexual liberation, virtually all women are chasing the top 10-20% of men, and those men never need to commit to get sex. these women continue chasing chad until they crash their fertility and beauty into the wall. only then, when chad ignores them, do they start to consider less desirable men. but increasingly, these less desirable men are realizing these women are alpha widowed -- used up. they've burnt out their ability to commit and are negative value to men because of divorce rape. at zero premarital sexual partners, her probability of divorce is <20%. at a single sexual partner, it jumps to ~50%. then it hovers around there until ~5 partners, where it steadily climbs, and at 16+ partners, she's practically guaranteed to divorce. ***these women aren't low value... they're negative value.*** men do not have this problem; male divorce rate is statistically uncorrelated in any way with premarital sexual partners.
the only way to fix it is to go back to shaming female promiscuity. that's definitely not happening, so the options are really (1) spin plates, (2) go your own way, or (3) get divorce raped and pick again.
it's called hypergamy. it's the defining trait of where the homo subfamily diverged from other primates... in all of the rest, females mate indiscriminately with males. it is then entirely up to males to battle each other and show/threaten dominance in order to breed. but hypergamy dictates that human females mate very discriminately -- only with the top 10-20% of men they perceive to be available.
this is fine when hypergamy is kept in check with monogamy. top people pair off and are removed from the mating market. then the next percentile of men pair off, and this repeats over ~10 years until 80% of society is paired off.
but when monogamy is replaced by female sexual liberation, virtually all women are chasing the top 10-20% of men, and those men never need to commit to get sex. these women continue chasing chad until they crash their fertility and beauty into the wall. only then, when chad ignores them, do they start to consider less desirable men. but increasingly, these less desirable men are realizing these women are alpha widowed -- used up. they've burnt out their ability to commit and are negative value to men because of divorce rape. at zero premarital sexual partners, her probability of divorce is <20%. at a single sexual partner, it jumps to ~50%. then it hovers around there until ~5 partners, where it steadily climbs, and at 16+ partners, she's practically guaranteed to divorce. ***these women aren't low value... they're negative value.*** men do not have this problem; male divorce rate is statistically uncorrelated in any way with premarital sexual partners.
the only way to fix it is to go back to shaming female promiscuity. that's definitely not happening, so the options are really (1) spin plates, (2) go your own way, or (3) get divorce raped and pick again.
