JFL Foids would rather be raped than stand within 7 miles of a subhuman male
How dare you, rape is worse than murder!
At least she is being downvoted.
Sounds about right. It's over. mms of bones determines whether you're a creepy basement dweller or you party and have sex.
I still don't really understand why the Neo-Left hates us so much.
Yeah, she was not raped, like all landwhales on cucktears. But if i see some blue haired whale being raped by a pack of males i will not intervene.
Because men who don't worship and cuck down to women are the natural enemy of the left
Couldn't find it on Removeddit so I'll be the one who'll archive it:
Narratives. Political discussions are divided in Left vs Right as if Cold War was still a thing because it's easier to demonize the other side by associating bad things to it and using minorities as a maneuver mass. According to their narrative, Right is everything wrong and bad, so we are all far right wing because we are supposedly wrong and bad.
This is legit the reason why I don't care about a single accusation over someone being a sex offender or rapist in 2019.
It's like, bitch, you waited 40 fucking years before saying anything, and NOW you're a victim? Fuck off. Any other crime you'd be laughed at, but because it's feeeemales, they can do no wrong and it's the biggest crime imaginable. Despite the fact that most of the time it's regret over sleeping with a non-Chad after drinking too much.
Nice.
I'll go one step further and show the subhuman in question. Notice how subhuman bone structure is apparent even through high excess body fat.
Rape is literally physically NO different than what the average femoid does every other night with Chad
Imagine being seen worse than a rapist for simply existing
D
Thing is, even though he would take the rapist off her, she would castigate him for what he posted online about the situation rather than his actual actions in reality
This is proof that for women, actions mean nothing, it's all words
This is proof that for women, actions mean nothing, it's all words
D
lol "rape". Rape is not a big deal. Its like going 10 miles over the speed limit on highways.
Females enjoy getting raped
Actually, reading this in context, it's "rather be raped a little longer".
In the comic, the guy is responding to a rape that has already started.
KetamineSuppository talks about "got my rapist off me" meaning she'd already been raped.
So it's like the difference between "I'd rather be raped for 2 minutes than be raped for 1 minute because an ugly guy rescued me halfway before the rapist ejaculated inside me"
2 minutes is clinical premature ejaculation mang. If you're suggesting what I think you are, and you're not so hard into LDAR you don't even use escorts, you might want to get that addressed.
2 minutes is premature if you're TRYING to last longer (ie you can't even moderate pace, etc) but obviously most rapists aren't going to give a shit about that and pump as fast/hard as possible (max stimulation) to finish quickly and GTFO assuming they're doing it in a place they could be discovered and don't have them locked in a rape dungeon for hours where they can take their time edging themselves.
You also have to keep in mind that since most women are aroused by rape, it makes their pussies tighten to 50% the usual diameter, so it would be extra hard to last long in them.
One major reason I think guys last longer during consensual sex is because the foids are less excited (maybe bored, disappointed) so their pussies don't inflate with blood (don't tighten) and so they remain loose and un-stimulating to the male.
Vaginas expand and self-lubricate to fit a penis in a state of arousal. They're tight and dry when they're not aroused. For that reason, rape can be physically traumatic for a female as well as mentally. Imagine your anus being forcibly penetrated without lube. How it would tear and bleed and be overall unpleasant. It's the same with an un-aroused vagina.
And 2 minutes is premature, according to clinical definition. Bona fide two pump chump. Sorry. Especially if you're using a dry tight pussy that probably isn't even as good as your hand, and you have the added stresses of an unwilling partner and the possibility of spending decades of your life in prison. You should be going for at least 5 minutes even without even the slightest attempt to go longer.
Based
Why are you talking like rape isn't often arousing to foids? It often is.
If your claim that arousal causes vaginal expansion is true, then rape should be minimally traumatic physically when a foid is aroused and her vag expands.
Instead, we see rape stories like one posted last month where the foid was turned on and her vag got tight for the rapist and it hurt extra hard for her but she liked it.
I am only talking about the kinetic dimensions.
Please explain to me your reasoning on how the vagina expands during arousal.
From what I have read about the structures engorging with blood, if a bunch of balloons get bigger then there is less air surrounding those balloons.
I could be missing something, but convince me by explaining the specifics not just parroting some feminist article.
I didn't say anything about lube, please drop that aspect.
I'm only talking about tightness.
Obviously an un-lubed vagina would cause more friction to a penis and get a guy off faster, which supports my 'dicks don't last as long during rape' theory.
Even a dry pussy would be better than your hand. Reread what you wrote, that sounds gay as shit.
Tight pussy isn't as good as your hand? What are you on?
If your claim that arousal causes vaginal expansion is true, then rape should be minimally traumatic physically when a foid is aroused and her vag expands.
Instead, we see rape stories like one posted last month where the foid was turned on and her vag got tight for the rapist and it hurt extra hard for her but she liked it.
Lubrication and size are different issues. I agree with you on lubrication, but I think that happens to help cope with the increased tightness.
I am only talking about the kinetic dimensions.
Please explain to me your reasoning on how the vagina expands during arousal.
From what I have read about the structures engorging with blood, if a bunch of balloons get bigger then there is less air surrounding those balloons.
I could be missing something, but convince me by explaining the specifics not just parroting some feminist article.
I didn't say anything about lube, please drop that aspect.
I'm only talking about tightness.
Obviously an un-lubed vagina would cause more friction to a penis and get a guy off faster, which supports my 'dicks don't last as long during rape' theory.
Depends on the mindset. "Added stress" might kill your boner entirely, but "the thrill of getting caught" or "the taboo of the disallowed" is totally a thing which makes people more aroused.
Even a dry pussy would be better than your hand. Reread what you wrote, that sounds gay as shit.
Tight pussy isn't as good as your hand? What are you on?
Stories like that have high visibility because they are novel. They're clickbait. Rape is, by and large, physically traumatic to both male and female victims.
Fucking kek, reasoning? No. It's anatomical mechanistic data; scientific fact. See http://www.annelawrence.com/genitaldimensions.html
If dry friction was the main driver of male sexual pleasure and led to faster climax, fleshlights would be made of sandpaper. Next time you masturbate, try rubbing your erect cock into a roll of sandpaper and see how fast you cum.
There is a tiny, tiny minority of severely mentally ill men who are psychologically aroused by rape. In some cases, rape is the only way they can be aroused. For the vast majority of men, rape isn't even worth the effort, let alone all the risks involved on top of it.
I've escortcelled dozens of times. Enough times to know that tighter is not always better. Especially when it's dry like an asshole jfl.
You have no way of proving that assumption. A lot of rape could involve no physical injury at all because the victim is passive.
Lawrence's 2004 paper is citing a 1966 study (Human Sexual Response) but it is easy for that study to have flaws.Anne Lawrence said:
For example, they might wrongly report a studied foid is "aroused" when actually she is "relaxing".
It is a false dichotomy to only study a 2-state aroused/unaroused factor because size would also be influened by variables such as conscious muscle tension.
As they rub that speculum in there they might be be thinking "oh, this movement is arousing her, that's why her vagina is opening up".
But actually, the explanation might be "oh, she was tensed up because she was scared, but now she's used to it and untensing her muscles".
Muscle tension is only one factor, the other is increased blood flow to all these orgasms which expands those walls, which means the canal NARROWS.
You're getting too all-or-nothing here.
Obviously there's an ideal middle ground of ideal friction, where more is worse and less is worse.
Where that medium falls in respect to a vaginas would probably also vary depending on factors like whether he is circumcised or whether he's wearing a condom.
I would specify either "by raping" or "by being raped" since either (or both) can be arousing to men.
Please explain what specific 'mental illness' you think is automatically present in men aroused by either of these?
I want a specific name.
Obviously that's above the happy medium in respect to your criteria then.
Although observed rates of genital injury in female rape victims are fairly low when limited to visual examination, they rise exponentially when more advanced forensic techniques are used. Rates as high as 87% with the colposcopic technique have been noted. Keep in mind this only includes genital injury, not injuries to other areas of the body that may occur in the act.
DEFINING PATTERNS OF GENITAL INJURY FROM SEXUAL ASSAULT: A Review
The forensic examination following rape has two primary purposes: to provide health care and to collect evidence. Physical injuries need treatment so that they heal without adverse consequences. The pattern of injuries also has a forensic significance ...
www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
There's no reason for this sort of ambiguity when the subject can just say outright whether she's aroused or not. You are arguing against set-in-stone anatomical fact that anyone who's not a male virgin with an irrational fear of anatomy textbooks already knows. Ask a gynecologist, ask a sex therapist, ask a 15-year-old girl in high school, they'll all agree with me.
A dry unaroused cunt is not "middle ground" jfl.
Sexual sadism disorder. Often comorbid with antisocial personality disorder, narcissistic personality disorder, and other extreme personality disorders.
I don't do Reddit much because I SUSPECTED it was full of crap like this. But did someone actually type, "You're not entitled to love OR A CHANCE AT IT"? So much for "unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." If you're "ugly," you have no right even to PURSUE love. Got it.
That's to be expected because foids are often turned on by rape so their pussies tighten, causing more injuries despite the lubrication.
That's not a reliable form of input, foids lie about what arouses them. Particularly in the 1960s they're going to pretend to be un-aroused by sexual violence and pretend to be aroused by pathetic beta romantic gestures.
All 3 groups are influenced by propaganda and culture to misrepresent themselves. None will openly admit to the prevalence of rape arousal. You can't just rely on their testimonials, you need solid theory explaining whatever phenomena they purport to experience.
Explain to me: why would only one dimension (depth, not radius) be measured in the study? Why would that be interpreted to mean it widens just because the womb pulls up.
Even ignoring the left/right tension from the bulbs pushing in due to muscle tension, stretching something in one direction tends to narrow those other directions.
You're pushing discrete where there is continuum, there's never 0% or 100% moistness.
Middle is subjective to extremes: obviously a 'dry cunt' is still softer than 'dry sandpaper', which is the example you used.
Sadism is when you are aroused by the idea of other people suffering.
It doesn't apply to a "she enjoys rape so I'm fulfilling her" mindset.
You can call that antisocial/narcissistic for a guy to think that way, I guess but that seems presumptuous.
The vagina expands in both length and circumference when the vagina is engorged with blood. Just like the penis. Unless your penis is box-shaped, you should have at least that frame of reference to understand basic female anatomy. There is no pulling up of the vaginal walls by the uterus, that is absurd.
You could say all the researchers, all their funders, and all their subjects were all conspiring to fool beta males into thinking females don't enjoy rape. I could just as easily say you're deluding yourself with literal two-dimensional thinking to cope with the fact that you're a two pump chump with a needle dick, and I'd actually be more justified in doing so because Occam's Razor applies here like it does everywhere else.
How dare you, rape is worse than murder!
A few millimetres of BONE.
Similar threads
The Scarlet Prince
Users who are viewing this thread
