Statement 1:Foids should not be treated as human and doing otherwise is against meritocratism and republicanism
>They are neither creative nor productive;they are the antithesis of those things,in fact,and is foreign to any notion of responsibility.
Thus,it is insane,that the supposedly 'Meritocratic' liberal democracies would give these foids any 'human' rights and protection when they prove to be nothing but mere nuisance to order.
Its almost like these foids are a member of a protected class,like the nobles of old.
And here i think that the core value of Republicanism is that the state will not recognize any inherent protected class.
Statement 2:Foids should not be treated as human and doing otherwise is against egalitarianism
"But-but i thought egalitarianism is giving equal rights to every human"
Yes,every human.My core argument is that foids should not be legally classified as human in a socialist,egalitarian society.
Before you sperg,let me ask you a short question:
From what basis do foids derive their worth?
From their physical traits and genetics,first and foremost.
And their avaliability in the market,i suppose.
And the level of technology,education and cultural development in the area where that foid resides.
Wait a second.
Those things sounds awfully familiar.
I mean you can use those to determine the value of the most basic of resources like gold or iron.
See where i am going now?
These foids are resources.They are means of production.
Their values are not determined by their personality,their skills or the amount of work they can generate,but
by their physical traits and their perceived value among the workers(men).
Just like raw materials.
Now,should a supposedly liberal and egalitarian society puts raw materials like women on the same level as human beings?
Should we give human rights to plutonium-chan next?
Statement 3:Women should not be treated as human beings because they have no part in human development as a whole.
"Well thats the most retarded statement i've ever heard.Dont you know that if not for women and their wombs our race wouldn't have survived its infancy?"
https://incels.is/threads/male-pregnancy-as-the-way-forward.134597/
Thats how technology works,cracker
>They are neither creative nor productive;they are the antithesis of those things,in fact,and is foreign to any notion of responsibility.
Thus,it is insane,that the supposedly 'Meritocratic' liberal democracies would give these foids any 'human' rights and protection when they prove to be nothing but mere nuisance to order.
Its almost like these foids are a member of a protected class,like the nobles of old.
And here i think that the core value of Republicanism is that the state will not recognize any inherent protected class.
Statement 2:Foids should not be treated as human and doing otherwise is against egalitarianism
"But-but i thought egalitarianism is giving equal rights to every human"
Yes,every human.My core argument is that foids should not be legally classified as human in a socialist,egalitarian society.
Before you sperg,let me ask you a short question:
From what basis do foids derive their worth?
From their physical traits and genetics,first and foremost.
And their avaliability in the market,i suppose.
And the level of technology,education and cultural development in the area where that foid resides.
Wait a second.
Those things sounds awfully familiar.
I mean you can use those to determine the value of the most basic of resources like gold or iron.
See where i am going now?
These foids are resources.They are means of production.
Their values are not determined by their personality,their skills or the amount of work they can generate,but
by their physical traits and their perceived value among the workers(men).
Just like raw materials.
Now,should a supposedly liberal and egalitarian society puts raw materials like women on the same level as human beings?
Should we give human rights to plutonium-chan next?
Statement 3:Women should not be treated as human beings because they have no part in human development as a whole.
"Well thats the most retarded statement i've ever heard.Dont you know that if not for women and their wombs our race wouldn't have survived its infancy?"
https://incels.is/threads/male-pregnancy-as-the-way-forward.134597/
Thats how technology works,cracker
