When women wear yoga pants/leggings, butt-cheek shorts, short and tight dresses, tight cleavage revealing shirts, and other provocative clothing in public, they're essentially lording their sexual power over any man who sees them- it is a subtle form of taunting and humiliation.
Why do women (yong women especially) often dress in ways that aren't merely "stylish," but arousing to male sexual tastes?The whore knows she is exciting the sexual urges of the men around her, but feels like she is untouchable from the consequences of that excitement by the laws and customs of society. And she is right- she is untouchable.
She gets to enjoy the thrill of being seen and desired as a sexual being while being insulated from the sexuality of the men around her. In other words, she's get to have her cake and eat it, too.
Because male and female social/sexual power are complementary rather than identical, the equivalent for men would not be walking around in yoga pants or with their balls hanging out or any such ridiculousness. No, the male equivalent of the widespread female practice of wearing sexuality provocative clothing is the legalization/social acceptance of groping and fondling. Male social/sexual power is, at heart, rooted in our physical power. We are bigger, badder, and stronger than women and, because of this fact, can ultimately take what we want from women. If men decided to start flaunting this power the way that women flaunt their sexual power with provocative clothing, then they would simply start groping every attractive woman they saw.
Women who dress like this are doing the equivalent of fondling every man they see: they are shamelessly exploiting their sexual power over strangers for their own selfish benefit.
Why do women (yong women especially) often dress in ways that aren't merely "stylish," but arousing to male sexual tastes?The whore knows she is exciting the sexual urges of the men around her, but feels like she is untouchable from the consequences of that excitement by the laws and customs of society. And she is right- she is untouchable.
She gets to enjoy the thrill of being seen and desired as a sexual being while being insulated from the sexuality of the men around her. In other words, she's get to have her cake and eat it, too.
Because male and female social/sexual power are complementary rather than identical, the equivalent for men would not be walking around in yoga pants or with their balls hanging out or any such ridiculousness. No, the male equivalent of the widespread female practice of wearing sexuality provocative clothing is the legalization/social acceptance of groping and fondling. Male social/sexual power is, at heart, rooted in our physical power. We are bigger, badder, and stronger than women and, because of this fact, can ultimately take what we want from women. If men decided to start flaunting this power the way that women flaunt their sexual power with provocative clothing, then they would simply start groping every attractive woman they saw.
Women who dress like this are doing the equivalent of fondling every man they see: they are shamelessly exploiting their sexual power over strangers for their own selfish benefit.
Last edited:
